Regular articleGang scheduling performance benefits for fine-grain synchronization
References (31)
- et al.
The Tera computer system
Intl. Conf. Supercomputing
(June 1990) The performance of spin lock alternatives for shared-memory multiprocessors
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Systems
(Jan. 1990)- et al.
Scheduler activations: Effective kernel support for the userlevel management of parallelism
ACM Trans. Comput. Systems
(Feb. 1992) - Ben-Asher, Y., Feitelson, D. G., and Rudolph, L. ParC—An extension of C for shared memory parallel processing....
- et al.
Performance and overhead measurements on the Makbilan
Scheduling support for concurrency and parallelism in the Mach operating system
Computer
(May 1990)- et al.
Scheduling multiprocessor tasks to minimize schedule length
IEEE Trans. Comput.
(May 1986) - et al.
The impact of synchronization and granularity on parallel systems
- et al.
Performance of synchronized iterative processes in multiprocessor systems
IEEE Trans. Software Engng.
(July 1982) - et al.
Considerations for massively parallel UNIX systems on the NYU Ultracomputer and IBM RP3
Distributed hierarchical control for parallel processing
Computer
(May 1990)
Mapping and scheduling in a shared parallel environment using distributed hierarchical control
Wasted resources in gang scheduling
The impact of operating system scheduling policies and synchronization methods on the performance of parallel applications
iRMK 1.2 Real-Time Kernel Reference Manual
(1988)
Cited by (0)
Copyright © 1992 Published by Elsevier Inc.