Abstract
Purchase PDF (2613 K)
E-mail Article
Add to my Quick Links
Purchase PDF (104 K)
doi:10.1016/0378-8733(84)90007-8 
Copyright © 1984 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.
Network items and the general social survey*1
Available online 15 October 2003.
References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.
Abstract
This is an argument for obtaining network data in the General Social Survey (GSS). The proposal requires a discussion of how and why at least minimal network data ought to be obtained in a probability sample survey of attitudes and behaviors.
I begin with general concerns; briefly describing the proposal, available experience with the proposed items in large probability samples, how the proposed items are different from existing GSS items, kinds of variables that the proposed items would generate, and kinds of research questions that could be addressed if the proposed items were included in the GSS.
I then address comparatively focused questions likely to arise in deliberations over the proposal; explaining how much interview time the proposed items are expected to require, why one rather than multiple name generators are proposed, why recording five alters is proposed, why intimacy is proposed as the name generator criterion content, why a short form is proposed for obtaining formal data, how priorities among name interpreter attribute items were established, how the proposed items elicit data on the strength and content of relationships, and how the proposed data might be coded for easy access by GSS users.
