Resolution of the enantiomers of ibuprofen; comparison study of diastereomeric method and chiral stationary phase method

https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4347(93)E0425-PGet rights and content

Abstract

In this study, an indirect diastereomeric method and a direct method utilizing a chiral stationary phase (CSP) were investigated for the resolution of ibuprofen enantiomers. In the indirect method, ethylchloroformate (ECF) and 2-ethoxy-1-1-ethoxycarbonyl-1,2-dihydroquinoline (EEDQ) were utilized as first-step derivatizing reagents in acetonitrile or toluene. In the direct CSP method, ibuprofen enantiomers were derivatized to p-nitrobenzyl ureides and then resolved on an (R)-(−)-(1-naphthyl)ethylurea CSP column. The derivatization procedure took place in 10 min with an overall inversion efficiency of 90.3%. Racemization was not observed under the derivatization conditions used. The HPLC-CSP method was utilized to study the pharmacokinetics of ibuprofen enantiomers in dog plasma after a single oral administration of 200 mg of ibuprofen racemate.

References (14)

  • A. Avgerinos et al.

    J. Chromatogr.

    (1987)
  • D.G. Kaiser et al.

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1976)
  • E.J.D. Lee et al.

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1984)
  • N. Janiczek et al.

    J. Chromatogr.

    (1991)
  • T.J. Wozniak et al.

    J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.

    (1991)
  • R. Mehvar et al.

    Clin. Chem.

    (1988)
  • J. Gal
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (24)

  • Enantioselective analysis of ibuprofen, ketoprofen and naproxen in wastewater and environmental water samples

    2011, Journal of Chromatography A
    Citation Excerpt :

    These MDLs were determined to be in the range of 0.2–1.4 ng L−1 for (S)-ibuprofen, 0.3–1.2 ng L−1 for (S)-naproxen and 1.3–3.3 ng L−1 for ketoprofen. Alteration of EF has previously been shown to occur during activation/amidation of profens [22,25,33]. The causes of such alterations could theoretically include enantiomeric inversion, thermodynamic differences in the equilibrium of the derivatization reactions for (R)- and (S)-enantiomers, or kinetic differences in the rate of formation of the diastereomers by the (R)- and (S)-enantiomers.

  • Second order standard addition method and fluorescence spectroscopy in the quantification of ibuprofen enantiomers in biological fluids

    2011, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems
    Citation Excerpt :

    These methods involve toxic and expensive solvents and they are tedious and time consuming. Moreover, many times indirect analysis is used based on diasteroisomeric formation [6–23]. In these cases, the imprecision in results can be higher due to impurities in reagents for derivatization or racemization used in the procedure [7].

  • Chiral discrimination of multiple profens as diastereomeric (R)-(+)-1-phenylethylamides by achiral dual-column gas chromatography

    2004, Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences
  • Stereospecific high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of ibuprofen in rat serum

    2003, Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences
  • Supercritical fluid extraction with in situ chiral derivatization for the enantiospecific determination of ibuprofen in urine samples

    2001, Analytica Chimica Acta
    Citation Excerpt :

    Ibuprofen is marketed as a racemate in most countries, and its enantioselective pharmacokinetics in healthy humans is a subject of much interest. A number of chromatographic methods for the determination of the enantiomeric composition of ibuprofen in plasma and urine samples, based on direct and indirect approaches to the enantioseparation, have been reported [8–16]. Most methods involve several steps namely: hydrolysis, extraction, drying, derivatization, redissolution and injection into the chromatographic system.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text