Elsevier

Field Crops Research

Volume 32, Issues 1–2, February 1993, Pages 147-158
Field Crops Research

Cultivar maturity and potential yield of soybean

https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(93)90027-KGet rights and content

Abstract

Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) cultivars from maturity groups 00, I, III, and V were grown in the field to evaluate the relationship between the length of total growth cycle and potential yield. Cultivars from maturity group 00 and I were grown in narrow rows (0.38 m) to obtain maximum insolation interception. The length of the vegetative growth period increased by 35 days from maturity group 00 to V. Plant size (total nodes per plant and maximum vegetative mass in g m−2) also increased with increasing maturity group. All cultivars reached maximum insolation interception soon after initial flowering. The crop growth rate of control plots (measured between growth stages R1 and R5) was not related to plant size. Shade (30 and 63%) from growth stage R1 to R7 was used to create variation in crop growth rate within a cultivar. For each cultivar, the number of seeds m−2 increased linearly with increasing crop growth rate. After adjusting for cultivar differences in individual seed growth rate, there were no cultivar differences in seeds m−2 at a constant crop growth rate. Thus, seeds m−2 was related to crop growth rate, not to the size of the plant. The maturity growth 00 cultivar tended to have a shorter seed-filling period but there were no consistent differences among the others. These data suggest that the longer vegetative growth period of later-maturing cultivars does not provide a higher yield potential and that shorter-season cultivars may have equal yield potential if exposed to a similar environment.

References (35)

  • S.J. Herbert et al.

    Growth response of short season soybean to variations in row spacing and density

    Field Crops Res.

    (1984)
  • J.S. Beaver et al.

    Dry matter accumulation patterns and seed yield components of two indeterminate soybean cultivars

    Agron. J.

    (1982)
  • A.H. Bunting

    Productivity and profit or is your vegetative phase really necessary?

    Ann. Appl. Biol.

    (1971)
  • D.A. Charles-Edwards

    Physiological Determinants of Crop Growth

  • D.A. Charles-Edwards

    On the ordered developments of plants 1. An hypothesis

    Ann. Bot.

    (1984)
  • D.A. Charles-Edwards et al.

    Modeling Plant Growth and Development

  • J.P. Cooper

    Control of photosynthetic production in terrestrial systems

  • T.B. Daynard et al.

    Duration of the grain filling period and its' relation to grain yield in corn, Zea mays L

    Crop Sci.

    (1971)
  • C.T. de Wit

    Photosynthesis: its relationship to overpopulation

  • D.B. Egli et al.

    Crop growth rate and seeds per unit area in soybean

    Crop Sci.

    (1991)
  • D.B. Egli et al.

    Influence of soybean seed size and position on the rate and duration of filling

    Agron. J.

    (1978)
  • D.B. Egli et al.

    Control of seed growth in soya beans (Glycine max (L.) Merrill)

    Ann. Bot.

    (1981)
  • D.B. Egli et al.

    Partitioning of assimilate between vegetative and reproductive growth in soybean

    Agron. J.

    (1985)
  • D.B. Egli et al.

    Factors associated with reduced yields of delayed plantings of soybean

    J. Agron. Crop Sci.

    (1987)
  • W.R. Fehr et al.

    Stages of soybean development

  • S. Gay et al.

    Physiological basis of yield improvement in soybeans

    Agron. J.

    (1980)
  • A.F. Hawkins

    Light interception, photosynthesis and crop productivity

    Outlook Agric.

    (1982)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text