The relative availability of phosphorus in inorganic feed phosphates for young turkeys and pigs

https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(85)90047-1Get rights and content

Abstract

The relative biological availability of phosphorus in four inorganic feed phosphates was estimated in three experiments.

Experiment 1, which involved turkey poults, compared monocalcium phosphate (MCP), hydrated dicalcium phosphate (DCP-hydr.) and anhydrous dicalcium phosphate, brand A (DCP-anhydr. A). The feed phosphates were added to a low-phosphorus basal diet at four levels: 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 g P per kg feed. Response parameters were live-weight gain, feed:gain ratio, P content of the tibia and the apparent digestion coefficient of P at the terminal ileum.

Response to P-dose was lowest for all parameters with DCP-anhydr. as the P source. With MCP as the phosphorus source, apparent P-digestion at the terminal ileum responded significantly better to P-dose than with DCP-hydr. A linear response was obtained only with the lower three levels of DCP-hydr. and DCP-anhydr. and with P-content of the tibia as the response parameter. From the dose response curves, biological availability of P in DCP-anhydr. A, relative to that in DCP-hydr., was estimated by the slope ratio technique to be 0.71 (95% confidence limits of ratio: 0.58–0.91).

In experiments 2 and 3, which involved young pigs aged 10–15 weeks, apparent digestion of P was used as the response parameter for estimating the relative biological availability of MCP, DCP-hydr. and DCP-anhydr. (brands A and B). DCP-hydr. and DCP-anhydr. were added to a low phosphorus basal diet at three levels: 0, 0.8 and 1.6 g P per kg feed and MCP 0 and 1.6 g P per kg feed. If biological availability of P in DCP-hydr. is set at 1.00, the values for DCP-anhydr. (brand A) and DCP-anhydr. (brand B) would be 0.887 (95% confidence limits: 0.769–0.998) and 0.879 (0.727–1.03). For MCP, biological availability of P was 1.25 and 1.16 in experiments 2 and 3, respectively. These values were significantly different from 1.00 (P < 0.05).

References (19)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (26)

  • Phosphorus nutrition of growing pigs

    2022, Animal Nutrition
    Citation Excerpt :

    The coexistence of multiple phosphate forms in individual commercial products was usually not suggested in the labels (Soares, Jr., 1995). The relative concentrations of dicalcium phosphate and monocalcium phosphate in a specific source of feed phosphate might not be important because both forms of P are equally digestible, but the bioavailability of P in anhydrous dicalcium phosphate appeared to be 88% of that in the hydrated form, because the dissolution in stomach may be slower for anhydrous dicalcium phosphate (Grimbergen et al., 1985). Phosphate is absorbed in inorganic form from both inorganic and organic sources after hydrolysis (Jongbloed, 1987).

  • A higher water-soluble phosphorus supplement in pig diet improves the whole system phosphorus use efficiency

    2020, Journal of Cleaner Production
    Citation Excerpt :

    In addition, the different manufacturing conditions employed in the production of DCP and MDCP may also lead to subtle changes and altered the absorption of P by animals (Petersen and Stein, 2006; Smol et al., 2019). Grimbergen et al. (1985) reported that supplementation of weaned piglet diets with anhydrous DCP increased animal growth, as compared to hydrated-DCP. Petersen and Stein (2006) also showed that P in food-grade anhydrous monosodium phosphate (MSP) was more bioavailable than P in DCP.

  • Comparison of retention and prececal digestibility measurements in evaluating mineral phosphorus sources in broilers

    2012, Poultry Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    In the present study, we used a corn-soybean meal-based diet (0.35% P of feed DM), which was supplemented with 3 graded P levels. In young turkeys, Grimbergen et al. (1985) determined pc digestibility of P from DCPa to be 35%, which confirms the values found in the present study with broilers. Leske and Coon (2002) demonstrated that the retention of P from different P sources depends on the amount of the P source included in a corn-soybean meal-based diet.

  • Comparison and evaluation of bone measurements for the assessment of mineral phosphorus sources in broilers

    2012, Poultry Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) between the slopes (MSPa vs. DCPa) in both periods. In confirmation of Huyghebaert et al. (1980) and Grimbergen et al. (1985), it is concluded that BW gain and feed conversion cannot be used as indicators of P availability. The studies described here were linked with another study that determined and compared the availability of the mineral phosphates based on P retention and prececal digestibility (Shastak et al., 2012).

  • A note on sampling digesta from the ileum of broilers in phosphorus digestibility studies

    2012, Poultry Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    The observation that the ratio between retained Ca and retained P was about 2 to 1 in both experiments across the whole range of intake studied (Figure 2) also indicates that Ca was not a limiting factor for P retention. Both retention and pc digestibility measurements were used for the evaluation of availability of P sources in poultry (Grimbergen et al., 1985; Van der Klis and Versteegh, 1996; De Groote and Huyghebaert, 1997; Leske and Coon, 2002; Rodehutscord and Dieckmann, 2005). As long as the P supply is below the requirement of the birds, both retention and pc digestibility approaches give very similar estimates of availability for the supplemented P sources, as indicated by the similarity in responses shown in Figures 1 and 3.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text