ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research
Volume 52, Issues 1-3, September 1992, Pages 83-105
Special Issue in Honour of Alexander R. McBirney
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Purchase PDF (3043 K)

Article Toolbox
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/0377-0273(92)90134-Y    
How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)

Copyright © 1992 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Geology and petrology of Floreana Island, Galapagos Archipelago, Ecuador

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Craig S. BowCorresponding Author Contact Information, a and Dennis J. Geistb

a12640 W. Cedar Drive, Lakewood, CO 80228, USA

bDepartment of Geology, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83843, USA


Received 2 August 1991; 
accepted 12 January 1992. 
Available online 23 April 2003.

Abstract

Floreana is the sixth largest of the Galapagos Islands and lies at the extreme southern margin of the Galapagos Platform. In sharp contrast to the other major islands, Floreana lacks a well-developed volcanic center, but instead is dominated by pyroclastic vents and derivative ash and cinder deposits. The majority of exposed lavas are xenolith-bearing alkali-olivine basalts that constitute a coherent suite referred to as the Main Series. The Flank Series comprises a group of isolated vents on the southern flank of the island which erupted xenolith-poor basaltic lavas that are generally poorer in incompatible trace elements and richer in plagioclase. Paleomagnetic measurements, supported by K-Ar age determinations, record a relatively limited timespan for subaerial volcanism. Shield development reached maximum dimensions by 1.0 Ma, with the final phases of pyroclastic activity at an end by 0.3 Ma.

Main Series rocks are phenocryst-poor and typically contain clusters of xenocrysts in an extremely fine-grained, granular matrix. Petrogenetic modelling indicates they represent products of partial melting of a LREE-enriched spinel-lherzolite source, little modified by subsequent fractional crystallization. Porphyritic Flank Series lavas experienced rather different ascent histories and may have resided in shallow-level magma chambers prior to eruption. Isotopic, geochemical and petrographic data demonstrate that Flank Series lavas are not cogenetic in any simple way with Main Series flows.

Floreana lavas contain a diverse suite of ultramafic xenoliths. Al-augite group megacrysts are likely to be cognate and comagmatic with host alkali-olivine basalts. Transition metal contents of megacrysts and host lavas, however, preclude clinopyroxene fractionation as a mechanism of magmatic differentiation. It is proposed that megacrysts were products of passive crystallization and were never effectively separated from host magmas. Cr-diopside group nodules may have crystallized at very high temperatures from advanced partial melts and are less likely to bear any direct genetic connection to host basalts.


Corresponding Author Contact InformationCorrespondence to: C.S. Bow, 12640 W. Cedar Drive, Lakewood, CO 80228, USA.

Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research
Volume 52, Issues 1-3, September 1992, Pages 83-105
Special Issue in Honour of Alexander R. McBirney
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.