Elsevier

Behavioural Processes

Volume 34, Issue 3, September 1995, Pages 233-239
Behavioural Processes

Research paper
Performance of domestic hens under progressive-ratio schedules of food delivery

https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-6357(94)00067-QGet rights and content

Abstract

Domestic hens were exposed to progressive-ratio 2 and progressive-ratio 10 schedules of food delivery with different initial ratios (2, 10, 20, 30, and 40). Breaking points, defined as the largest ratios completed before responding ceased for 600 consecutive seconds, were recorded under all conditions. In general, breaking points were higher under the PR 10 schedule than under the PR 2 schedule, and the value of the initial ratio did not systematically affect the breaking point. The former finding suggests that relative satiation affected breaking points in the present study, but the latter finding suggests that the primary determinant was the ‘price’ of the reinforcer, defined in terms of the number of responses required to produce it. Breaking points were similar under conditions where initial ratios changed from session to session and under more conventional conditions, where initial ratios remained unchanged over several sessions.

References (15)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (5)

  • The demand of laying hens for feathers and wood shavings

    2006, Applied Animal Behaviour Science
  • Working for food under conditions of varying motivation in broilers

    2004, Animal Behaviour
    Citation Excerpt :

    Robinson et al. (1995) and Foster et al. (1997) continued a session until 10 min elapsed without a response, whereas Savory et al. (1993) had sessions of 16 min. We chose another criterion because we wanted to test all the birds in 1 day, in contrast to Robinson et al. (1995) and Foster et al. (1997). In addition, we wanted the birds to achieve the maximum price within a session.

  • Behavioural Priorities of Laying Hens

    2003, Avian and Poultry Biology Reviews
  • The use of operant technology to measure behavioral priorities in captive animals

    2001, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers
View full text