Elsevier

Meat Science

Volume 43, Issue 2, June 1996, Pages 187-193
Meat Science

The enumeration of coliforms and E. Coli on naturally contaminated beef: A comparison of the petrifilm method with the Australian Standard

https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(96)84590-6Get rights and content

Abstract

Petrifilm PEC was compared to Australian Standard (AS) methods for the enumeration of coliforms and Escherichia coli on 50 naturally contaminated beef samples from three meat works. The standard methods consist of a 3-tube most probable number test or a direct plate count on tryptone bile agar for E. coli, and violet red bile agar and the most probable number test for conliorms (AS 1766.2.12.1984 and AS 1766.2.3.1992).

No significant difference was found between the methods, except that the count of E. coli on the direct plate method with a resuscitation step was significantly higher than the count on Petrifilm, most probable number or direct plate count without resuscitation.

References (7)

  • W.L.P. Bredie et al.

    Int. J. Food Microb.

    (1992)
  • R.R. Matner et al.

    J. Food Prot.

    (1990)
  • L. Restaino et al.

    J. Food Prot.

    (1990)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (7)

  • Microbial challenges of poultry meat production

    2011, Anaerobe
    Citation Excerpt :

    Enterobacteriaceae Counts (EBC) and Escherichiacoli: Enterobacteriaceae Counts (EBC) were enumerated by the pour-plating method on violet red bile glucose agar (VRBA; Difco Laboratories Inc.). The plates were overlaid with a virgin layer of the same growth medium before incubation at 37 °C (EBC) and 44.5 °C (E. coli) for 24 h [8]. The red colonies (diameter = 0.5 mm) which appeared within 24 h were considered as presumptive E. coli.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text