Elsevier

Meat Science

Volume 24, Issue 2, 1988, Pages 85-126
Meat Science

A review of the relationships of pH with physical aspects of pork quality

https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(88)90052-6Get rights and content

Abstract

The pH1-index, defined as the percent of carcasses with pH < 6·0 at 45 min post-mortem (p-m), gives some indication of the likely incidence of pale, soft, exudative (PSE) pork at 24 h or more p-m. However, there is considerable variation between nations in the subjective definition of PSE. Thus, pH data show that subjectively-defined PSE pork from one country might be regarded as normal pork in another country, and vice versa. The paleness of pork is inversely proportional to pH. The data from conventional monochromatic reflectance photometers are almost linearly related to pH whereas the data from the Goefo meter and fibre-optic (FO) probes follow curvilinear relationships which may be logarithmic. In the visible spectrum, correlations of FO reflectance with pH and muscle structure are strongest towards 700 nm. The relationship of pH with exudate (bag-drip) is biphasic with fluid losses increasing from pH 7 to about 6·1, then staying constant at lower pHs. This biphasic pattern is also seen in some, but not all, methods in which exudate is measured by applied pressure or in which myofibrillar water-holding capacity is measured by centrifugation. Electrical impedance and its primary determinants (resistance and capacitance in parallel) are directly proportional to pH but follow curvilinear relationships. There is at least some theoretical understanding of the relationship of pH with exudate, but much remains to be learnt about the causal relationships of pH with paleness or softness. Many of the older published studies in the field are marred by a failure to separate genetic causes of low-pH (porcine stress syndrome) from environmental causes (preslaughter handling, slaughter and refrigeration).

References (143)

  • J.R. Bendall
  • J.R. Bendall et al.

    J. comp. Pathol.

    (1962)
  • E.J. Briskey

    Adv. Fd Res.

    (1964)
  • J.P. Chadwick et al.

    Meat Sci.

    (1983)
  • K.S. Cheah et al.

    Meat Sci.

    (1984)
  • C.F. Cori et al.

    J. biol. Chem.

    (1928)
  • G. Eikelenboom et al.

    Meat Sci.

    (1988)
  • D.J. Etherington et al.

    Meat Sci.

    (1987)
  • D.G. Evans et al.

    Livest. Prod. Sci.

    (1978)
  • P. Jensen et al.

    Livest. Prod. Sci.

    (1980)
  • S.D.M. Jones et al.

    Can. Inst. Fd Sci. Technol. J.

    (1984)
  • R.G. Kauffman et al.

    Meat Sci.

    (1986)
  • R.G. Kauffman et al.

    Meat Sci.

    (1986)
  • H. Korkeala et al.

    Meat Sci.

    (1986)
  • B.B. Marsh

    Biochim. biophys. Acta

    (1952)
  • G. Monin et al.

    Meat Sci.

    (1985)
  • G. Monin et al.

    Meat Sci.

    (1981)
  • R.T. Pearson et al.

    Biochim. biophys. Acta

    (1974)
  • E. Rome

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (1968)
  • Agriculture Canada

    Pork Quality

    (1981)
  • Very Lean Pigs

    Meat Livestock Comm., Bletchley. Planning and Development Rep.

    (1983)
  • F.H. Banfield

    J. Soc. Chem. Ind. Trans. Comm.

    (1935)
  • F.H. Banfield et al.

    J. Soc. Chem. Ind. Trans. Comm.

    (1935)
  • P.A. Barton-Gade
  • P.A. Barton-Gade
  • E.C. Bate-Smith et al.

    J. Physiol., Lond.

    (1949)
  • E.C. Bate-Smith et al.

    Br. med. Bull.

    (1956)
  • N. Bech

    Beretn. Førsøgslab.

    (1931)
  • J.R. Bendall
  • J.R. Bendall

    J. Sci. Fd Agric.

    (1975)
  • J.R. Bendall et al.

    Anim. Breed. Abst.

    (1964)
  • J.R. Bendall et al.

    J. Fd Sci.

    (1962)
  • J.R. Bendall et al.

    J. Fd Technol.

    (1966)
  • J. Benson

    Am. Laborat.

    (1988)
  • M.C. Berman et al.

    Nature, Lond.

    (1970)
  • C. Bernard

    Leçons sur la diabète et la glycogénèse animal

  • H.M. Blendl et al.

    Fleischwirts.

    (1978)
  • K.G. Braund et al.

    Vet. Pathol.

    (1988)
  • E.H. Callow

    Ann. Rep. Fd Invest. Board, Lond.

    (1935)
  • E.H. Callow

    Ann. Rep. Fd Invest. Board, Lond.

    (1936)
  • E.H. Callow

    Ann. Rep. Fd Invest. Board, Lond.

    (1937)
  • H. Clausen et al.

    Beretn. Førsøgslab.

    (1959)
  • L. Diesbourg et al.

    J. Anim. Sci.

    (1988)
  • G. Eikelenboom
  • G. Eikelenboom
  • G. Eikelenboom et al.

    J. Anim. Sci.

    (1974)
  • G. Eikelenboom et al.

    Tijdschr. Diergeneesk.

    (1974)
  • W.A. Empey

    J. Soc. Chem. Ind.

    (1933)
  • C. Fisher
  • C. Fisher et al.

    Meat Sci.

    (1979)
  • Cited by (266)

    • Reduced scald time does not influence ultimate pork quality

      2022, Meat Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      As such, this scenario results in meat with lower water-holding capacities (WHC), which changes the interaction of light with the tissue and gives the resulting meat a lighter colored appearance. Because pH and temperature impact overall meat quality development, and the likelihood of temperature abuse is high during the harvesting process, it is easy to understand why this whole process has been heavily investigated for decades (Bendall & Swatland, 1988; Offer, 1991; Maynard & Warner, 1996; Kim et al., 2016). In fact, carcass temperatures normally increase slightly due to basal levels of metabolism and the fact that the circulatory system is lost in the process of harvesting.

    • Impact of raw ham quality and tumbling time on the technological properties of polyphosphate-freecooked ham

      2020, Meat Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      As for the colour parameters, it is clear from Table 2 that the different quality classes, in this research determined by pH, showed no significant difference in lightness (L⁎) or redness (a⁎) while the b⁎ values (yellowness) were significantly (p < .05) higher with decreasing quality. Other studies (Bendall & Swatland, 1988; Lindahl, Henckel, Karlsson, & Andersen, 2006; Van de Perre et al., 2010) did not only show a negative correlation between the pH measured 24 h post mortem and b⁎, but also between pH and L*, attributed to protein inactivation of oxygen-consuming enzymes and protein denaturation (Lindahl et al., 2006). For the production of high quality cooked ham, the raw hams were injected with 12% brine.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text