ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Purchase PDF (3253 K)

Article Toolbox
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/0304-3975(95)00166-2    
How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)

Copyright © 1996 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.

Regular paper

On the operational semantics of nondeterminism and divergence*1

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Hakan Erdogmusa, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Robert Johnstonb and Michael Fergusonb

a Institute for Information Technology, National Research Council Canada, Montreal Road, Building M-50, Ottawa, Ont., Canada K1A 0R6

b INRS-Télécommunications, 16, Place du Commerce, Verdun, Qué., Canada H3E 1C8


Received 29 August 1995; 
revised 3 October 1995 and 24 November 1995. 
Available online 16 February 1999.

Abstract

An operational model of nondeterministic processes coupled with a novel theory of divergence is presented. The operational model represents internal nondeterminism without using explicit internal transitions. Here the notion of internal state effectively replaces the familiar notion of internal transition, giving rise to an alternative operational view of processes: the weak process. Roughly, a weak process is a collection of stable internal states together with a set of transitions each of which is defined from an internal state to another weak process. Internal nondeterminism arises from such refinement of processes into multiple internal states.

A simple extension to the basic weak process model gives rise to an elaborate operational theory of divergence. According to this theory, the ability of a process to undertake an infinite internal computation which is pathological, or persistent, is distinguished from its ability to undertake an infinite internal computation which is not. Although applicable to process algebraic languages with an internal action construct, the resulting model is most suitable for supplying operational semantics to process algebras which express internal nondeterminism by an internal choice construct. The distinction between the two forms of divergence is in particular taken into account when the hiding construct of such a process algebra is assigned a weak process semantics.

Article Outline

• References

Corresponding Author Contact InformationCorresponding author.

*1 NRC no. 39184. This work was supported by INRS-Télécommunications.


 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.