ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Social Science & Medicine
Volume 18, Issue 12, 1984, Pages 1063-1069
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Purchase PDF (968 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
Special issue
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/0277-9536(84)90166-7    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 1984 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Games that professionals play: The social psychology of physician-nurse interaction

M. Tellis-Nayak1 and V. Tellis-Nayak2

1 Home Med-Care Foundation, 6549 West North Avenue, Oak Park, IL 60302, USA 2 Department of Sociology and Anthropology, St Xavier College, 3700 West 103rd Street, Chicago, IL 60655, U.S.A.

Available online 4 July 2002.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

The paradox of power dictates that though a society segregates its members into stratified groups, society has to bring these socially distant groups together in a collaborative effort in order to make the social enterprise possible. In terms of professional power, physicians and nurses are hierarchically related in a disparity which is firmly grounded in the social structure. But in a hospital setting these unequal professionals share a common environment and a common goal; they collaborate and communicate in deep interrelationships. Power asymmetry and social intimacy are contrasting categories, and when they are brought together, as in a physician-nurse relationship, there arises an elaborate social ritual that makes an effective communication between them possible without diluting the differences in their status and authority. Their social psychological game manifests itself in both institutional and behavioral expressions. The perpetuation of power rests on a structural and symbolic legitimacy. Any attempt to change the status quo would require that one recognize and deal with both these faces of power.

Article Outline

• References

 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.