A sediment budget for the Choptank River estuary in Maryland, U.S.A.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7714(83)90007-0Get rights and content

Abstract

A sediment budget for the Choptank River, one of the three largest estuaries on the eastern shore of Chesapeake Bay, was developed from measurements of sediment carried in upland runoff, shore erosion, sedimentation, and levels of suspended sediments in estuarine waters. Shore erosion was the major source of sediment (340 × 106 kg y−1), contributing seven times more sediment than upland runoff. Low relief, the rural character of the Coastal Plain drainage basin, and the susceptibility of poorly consolidated shoreline materials to erosion contributed to the dominance of shore erosion over runoff as a sediment source. Box modelling indicated a net annual flux (14–44 × 106 kg y−1) of sediment from the Choptank River to Chesapeake Bay. A mass balance estimate of sedimentation, calculated as the difference between total inputs and loss at the mouth of the estuary, (350 × 106 kg y−1) agreed well with an estimate based on 210Pb profiles (340 × 106 kg y−1) measured along the longitudinal axis of the estuary. Lead-210 sedimentation rates correspond to accumulation rates of 1·5–7·9 mm y−1.

References (36)

  • J.L. Glenn et al.

    Sedimentation and eutrophication in the Potomac River and estuary

    Estuaries

    (1981)
  • E.D. Goldberg et al.

    Pollution history of the Savannah River estuary

    Environmental Science and Technology

    (1979)
  • D.J. Hirschberg et al.

    Recent geochemical history of flood deposits in the northern Chesapeake Bay

    Estuarine Coastal and Marine Science

    (1979)
  • R.J. Huggett et al.

    Kepone contamination of the James River estuary

  • J.F. Hunter

    Erosion and sedimentation in Chesapeake Bay around the mouth of the Choptank River

    U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 90

    (1914)
  • G.F. Jordan

    Erosion and sedimentation, eastern Chesapeake Bay at the Choptank River

    U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey, Technical Bulletin

    (1961)
  • H.J. Knebel et al.

    Sedimentary framework of the Potomac River estuary, Maryland

    Geological Society of America Bulletin, Part I

    (1981)
  • J.W. Kofoed et al.

    Sediments of the Choptank River, Maryland

    Southeastern Geology

    (1966)
  • Cited by (28)

    • Analysis of long-term (2002–2020) trends and peak events in total suspended solids concentrations in the Chesapeake Bay using MODIS imagery

      2021, Journal of Environmental Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      An important goal of the program is to meet water quality standards for dissolved oxygen, water clarity, underwater grasses, and chlorophyll-a in the bay and tidal tributaries by implementing specific pollution reduction actions for nitrogen, phosphorus, sediment, and other pollutant inputs into the bay (CBP, 2014). The sediment input into the Chesapeake Bay originates from several river watersheds that span an area of more than 100,000 km2 and from coastal erosion and resuspension (Wright et al., 1997; Yarbro et al., 1983). The majority of the sediments derive from thousands of small streams, and 9 major rivers drain approximately 53 billion gallons of water per day into the bay (CBP, 1983b).

    • Shoreline erosion and decadal sediment accumulation in the Tar-Pamlico estuary, North Carolina, USA: A source-to-sink analysis

      2018, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Shoreline erosion accounts for over 40% of the total supply of muddy sediment to the system, while the Tar River input equals 57% of the material. Interestingly, this contribution from shoreline erosion is less than the amount reported in other studies, including the Neuse River estuary and tributaries of the Chesapeake Bay (Benninger and Wells, 1993; Marcus and Kearney, 1991; Patchineelam et al., 1999; Yabro et al., 1983). In the PRE, approximately one third of shoreline, i.e., the sediment banks, is expected to only contribute sandy sediment to nearshore shoals and shallow margins (<2.5 m depth; Bellis et al., 1975; Wells and Kim, 1989).

    • Sediment deposition from tropical storms in the upper Chesapeake Bay: Field observations and model simulations

      2014, Continental Shelf Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Elevated discharge is generally short-lived for these tributaries and little fine-sediment is delivered to Chesapeake Bay. For example, the Choptank River, one of the largest eastern-shore tributaries (watershed area 1780 km2), had record discharge after Hurricane Irene (251.3 m3/s; www.water.usgs.gov) that was two orders of magnitude greater than the average discharge (3.7 m3/s; Yarbro et al., 1983); however, discharge had returned to previous baseflow levels within a few days. The Susquehanna River and tributary rivers on the Bay's western shore tend to have larger drainage basins with steeper gradients than those of the Coastal Plain and eastern shore, and as a result, they deliver greater amounts of sediment to the Chesapeake Bay estuarine system (Langland and Cronin, 2003).

    • Comparison of sediment supply to San Francisco Bay from watersheds draining the Bay Area and the Central Valley of California

      2013, Marine Geology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The transport of sediment from land to many of the world's most populous estuaries and adjacent coasts often forms the basis for computations of loads of other water quality constituents and is important for resource management decisions (Long Island Sound: Bokuniewicz et al., 1976; Choptank River Estuary: Yabro et al., 1983; Chesapeake Bay: Hobbs et al., 1992; Brisbane River Estuary and Moreton Bay: Eyre et al., 1998; Eyre and McKee, 2002; Mississippi and Gulf of Mexico: Turner et al., 2007; Southern California Bight: Warrick and Farnsworth, 2009, East China Sea: Deng et al., 2006; Southern San Francisco Bay: Shellenbarger et al., 2013--this issue).

    • Seasonal and interannual patterns of sedimentation in the corsica river (MD): Evaluating the potential influence of watershed restoration

      2013, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Corsica River discharge typically reaches a minimum in the summer and a maximum in the spring (Palinkas and Cornwell, 2012). These trends are typical of Coastal Plain rivers in Maryland (e.g., the Choptank River; Yarbro et al., 1983; Fisher et al., 1998) and reflect seasonal changes in groundwater conditions. Evapotranspiration is highest in the summer and reduces groundwater to its lowest levels, followed by groundwater recharge and saturation in the spring (Novotny and Olem, 1994).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    c

    Present address: Harbor Branch Foundation, Inc., R.R. 1, Box 196, Fort Pierce, FL 33450, U.S.A.

    View full text