Review of the validation and dissemination of eye-movement desensitization and reprocessing: A scientific and ethical dilemma

https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(94)90026-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Eye-Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), a technique that combines imaginai exposure with eye movement, recently has been proposed by its originator, F. Shapiro, as a prescriptive treatment for trauma-related anxiety. To date, several uncontrolled case studies have found EMDR to be effective. However, none employed objective or standardized dependent measures of therapeutic improvement and all combined EMDR with other interventions. In contrast to results obtained from case studies, controlled experiments utilizing objective and standardized dependent measures have failed to support the efficacy of the technique beyond that of its imaginal exposure component. Unfortunately, these experiments employed small samples with a limited range of disorders, indicating the need for further evaluation. However, unbiased replication is impeded by Shapiro's practice of prohibiting individuals not associated with her EMDR Institute from training others in the technique. We articulate our concern that despite its lack of empirical validation clinical application of the technique by behavior therapists is rapidly increasing.

References (24)

  • J. Wolpe et al.

    Post-traumatic stress disorder overcome by eye-movement desensitization: A case report

    Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

    (1991)
  • Acierno, R., Tremont, G., Last, C. G., & Montgomery, D. (in press). Tripartite assessment of the efficacy of...
  • Cited by (54)

    • Efficacy of EMDR in children: A meta-analysis

      2009, Clinical Psychology Review
    • Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing in an adolescent with epilepsy and mild intellectual disability

      2009, Epilepsy and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is important to measure the effects of EMDR not only between sessions, but also after closure of the treatment (posttest) and to conduct follow-up measurement. Trauma symptoms measured between sessions should be indicative of the conclusion of treatment, because the SUD and VOC are sensitive to demand characteristics [60]. These may be even more at stake in people with intellectual disabilities.

    • Mental health in complex emergencies

      2004, Lancet
      Citation Excerpt :

      Raphael and Wilson90 conclude that stress debriefing, a structured interview that elicits traumatic experience and reactions, is not recommended for disaster-affected populations as it might be both ineffective and potentially harmful. A role for eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing, a treatment that relies on the desensitisation of traumatic thoughts through repetitive eye movements, has yet to be substantiated.91–93 Art therapy, in which children relive their experience of violence, might have no harmful effects but this type of therapy has not been proved to be beneficial.94

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text