Review of the validation and dissemination of eye-movement desensitization and reprocessing: A scientific and ethical dilemma
References (24)
- et al.
Behavioral treatment of panic disorder
Behavior Therapy
(1989) - et al.
Eye movement desensitization: A critique of the evidence
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
(1992) - et al.
Treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder with eye movement desensitization and reprocessing
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
(1992) - et al.
A methodological critique of the current status of eye movement desensitization (EMDR)
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
(1992) A report on seventy-eight cases treated by eye movement desensitization
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
(1991)Post-traumatic stress disorder due to devastating burns overcome by a single session of eye movement desensitization
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
(1992)Eye movement desensitization treatment of a child's nightmares: A case report
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
(1993)Treating traumatic memories: A case report on the eye movement desensitization procedure
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
(1991)- et al.
Eye movement desensitization versus image confrontation: A single session crossover study of 58 phobic subjects
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
(1992) Eye movement desensitization: A new treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
(1989)
Post-traumatic stress disorder overcome by eye-movement desensitization: A case report
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Cited by (54)
Efficacy of EMDR in children: A meta-analysis
2009, Clinical Psychology ReviewEye movement desensitization and reprocessing in an adolescent with epilepsy and mild intellectual disability
2009, Epilepsy and BehaviorCitation Excerpt :It is important to measure the effects of EMDR not only between sessions, but also after closure of the treatment (posttest) and to conduct follow-up measurement. Trauma symptoms measured between sessions should be indicative of the conclusion of treatment, because the SUD and VOC are sensitive to demand characteristics [60]. These may be even more at stake in people with intellectual disabilities.
Mental health in complex emergencies
2004, LancetCitation Excerpt :Raphael and Wilson90 conclude that stress debriefing, a structured interview that elicits traumatic experience and reactions, is not recommended for disaster-affected populations as it might be both ineffective and potentially harmful. A role for eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing, a treatment that relies on the desensitisation of traumatic thoughts through repetitive eye movements, has yet to be substantiated.91–93 Art therapy, in which children relive their experience of violence, might have no harmful effects but this type of therapy has not been proved to be beneficial.94
Efficacy of Eye Movement Desensitization in the treatment of cognitive intrusions related to a past stressful event
2002, Journal of Anxiety DisordersUtilizing disclosure in the treatment of the sequelae of childhood sexual abuse: A theoretical and empirical review
2001, Clinical Psychology Review