Pitch dynamism in female and male speech
References (69)
Speech Analysis, Synthesis and Perception
(1972)Acoustic variability in the vowels of female and male speakers
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
(1992)- et al.
Anatomical and cultural determinants of male and female speech
The Nature of Prejudice
(1954)The voice of personality: stereotyped judgements and their relation to voice quality and sex of speaker
Journal of Social Psychology
(1976)Some social aspects of paralanguage
Canadian Journal of Linguistics
(1965)Intonation and its Parts
(1986)Male-female intonation patterns in American English
- et al.
Gender recognition from speech. Part II: fine analysis
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
(1991) Women, Men, and Language
(1986)
Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English
The English Tone of Voice
Differences in the F0 patterns of speech: tone language versus stress language
Language and Speech
How the speech of some is more equal than others
Question intonation and sex roles
Language in Society
Sex differences in speech style
Women Speaking
RP-accented female speech. The voice of perceived androgyny?
Three investigations of sex-associated speech variation in day school
The neglected situation
Understanding and describing long term pitch of voice: some methodological considerations
Discourse specific pitch behaviour
Fact and fiction in the description of female and male pitch
Language & Communication
The abnormality of male speech
Speech synthesis: telling it like it is
Australasian Wheels for the Mind
Creak as a sociophonetic marker
Voice characteristics of female speech and their representation in computer speech synthesis and recognition
Wolof speech styles and social status
Language, its Nature, Use, and Development
Phonotypologische beschrijving van de bevolking der Wieringermeer
Gender: an Ethnomethodological Approach
Male/Female Language
Women and Men Speaking
Cited by (41)
Sounds hard: Prosodic features reflect effort level and related affective states during exercise
2023, Mental Health and Physical Activity‘They just had such a sweet way of speaking’: Constructed voices and prosodic styles in Kodiak Alutiiq
2019, Language and CommunicationCitation Excerpt :F0 range is not a perfect measurement of F0 variability in that a wide F0 range does not necessarily imply variable F0 throughout the intonation units. However, it provides a reasonable proxy for F0 variability that is more easily implementable than metrics that measure the velocity of the intonation contour, such as those discussed in Henton (1995). The team of ten interns was trained to code intonational contours, voice quality, and speech rate based on both their auditory perceptions and—in the case of voice quality—the Praat spectrogram.
A prosodic profile of American Aviation English
2019, English for Specific PurposesCitation Excerpt :Speaker means for pitch range were significantly smaller in the ATC corpus (N = 19, M = 58.8 Hz, SD = 21.0) than in the BUR corpus (N = 7, M = 133.1 Hz, SD = 31.6; F(1, 24) = 48.5, p < .001) when comparing speaker means (see Figure 1). However, since female speakers generally have a larger pitch range than males (Henton, 1995) and there are proportionally more females in the BUR than the ATC corpus, the effect of speaker sex was examined within and between groups (see Figure 1). Our results indicate that both females and males had significantly smaller pitch ranges in the ATC corpus than in the BUR corpus.
Intonation and Phonation in Young Adults with Down Syndrome
2009, Journal of VoiceCitation Excerpt :The higher mean speaking F0 may be the reflection of physiological factors at the level of the larynx in that it may point toward generally shorter vocal folds in this client group. It should, however, not be excluded that the higher average speaking F0 may also have been acquired as an indicator of submissiveness in social interactions26 and may thus be related to personality characteristics of this client group. Besides the higher speaking F0, it was found that the standard deviation around the mean is also significantly lower in the Down syndrome group, suggesting that their rendering of speech intonation is less melodious and more monotonous than that of the control group.
Same difference: The phonetic shape of High Rising Terminals in London
2020, English Language and Linguistics