Pitch dynamism in female and male speech

https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(94)00011-ZGet rights and content

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (69)

  • D. Crystal

    Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English

    (1969)
  • D. Crystal

    The English Tone of Voice

    (1975)
  • S.J. Eady

    Differences in the F0 patterns of speech: tone language versus stress language

    Language and Speech

    (1982)
  • C. Eble

    How the speech of some is more equal than others

  • EDELMAN, B. and HENTON, C. (forthcoming) Generating and manipulating emotional speech on a personal...
  • C. Edelsky

    Question intonation and sex roles

    Language in Society

    (1979)
  • O. Elyan

    Sex differences in speech style

    Women Speaking

    (1978)
  • O. Elyan et al.

    RP-accented female speech. The voice of perceived androgyny?

  • A. Fichtelius et al.

    Three investigations of sex-associated speech variation in day school

  • E. Goffman

    The neglected situation

  • D. Graddol

    Understanding and describing long term pitch of voice: some methodological considerations

  • D. Graddol

    Discourse specific pitch behaviour

  • B.G. Henneke et al.
  • C.G. Henton

    Fact and fiction in the description of female and male pitch

    Language & Communication

    (1989)
  • C. Henton

    The abnormality of male speech

  • C. Henton

    Speech synthesis: telling it like it is

    Australasian Wheels for the Mind

    (1993)
  • C.G. Henton et al.

    Creak as a sociophonetic marker

  • D. Huber

    Voice characteristics of female speech and their representation in computer speech synthesis and recognition

  • J.T. Irvine

    Wolof speech styles and social status

    (1975)
  • O. Jespersen

    Language, its Nature, Use, and Development

    (1923)
  • L. Kaiser

    Phonotypologische beschrijving van de bevolking der Wieringermeer

    (1949)
  • S.J. Kessler et al.

    Gender: an Ethnomethodological Approach

    (1978)
  • M.R. Key

    Male/Female Language

    (1972)
  • C. Kramarae

    Women and Men Speaking

    (1981)
  • Cited by (41)

    • ‘They just had such a sweet way of speaking’: Constructed voices and prosodic styles in Kodiak Alutiiq

      2019, Language and Communication
      Citation Excerpt :

      F0 range is not a perfect measurement of F0 variability in that a wide F0 range does not necessarily imply variable F0 throughout the intonation units. However, it provides a reasonable proxy for F0 variability that is more easily implementable than metrics that measure the velocity of the intonation contour, such as those discussed in Henton (1995). The team of ten interns was trained to code intonational contours, voice quality, and speech rate based on both their auditory perceptions and—in the case of voice quality—the Praat spectrogram.

    • A prosodic profile of American Aviation English

      2019, English for Specific Purposes
      Citation Excerpt :

      Speaker means for pitch range were significantly smaller in the ATC corpus (N = 19, M = 58.8 Hz, SD = 21.0) than in the BUR corpus (N = 7, M = 133.1 Hz, SD = 31.6; F(1, 24) = 48.5, p < .001) when comparing speaker means (see Figure 1). However, since female speakers generally have a larger pitch range than males (Henton, 1995) and there are proportionally more females in the BUR than the ATC corpus, the effect of speaker sex was examined within and between groups (see Figure 1). Our results indicate that both females and males had significantly smaller pitch ranges in the ATC corpus than in the BUR corpus.

    • Intonation and Phonation in Young Adults with Down Syndrome

      2009, Journal of Voice
      Citation Excerpt :

      The higher mean speaking F0 may be the reflection of physiological factors at the level of the larynx in that it may point toward generally shorter vocal folds in this client group. It should, however, not be excluded that the higher average speaking F0 may also have been acquired as an indicator of submissiveness in social interactions26 and may thus be related to personality characteristics of this client group. Besides the higher speaking F0, it was found that the standard deviation around the mean is also significantly lower in the Down syndrome group, suggesting that their rendering of speech intonation is less melodious and more monotonous than that of the control group.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text