ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Purchase PDF (641 K)

Article Toolbox
  E-mail Article   
  Add to my Quick Links   
Bookmark and share in 2collab (opens in new window)
Request permission to reuse this article
  Cited By in Scopus (0)
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/0169-7552(91)90089-U    
How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)

Copyright © 1991 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.

A simulation study on the service strategies for packet voice communication networks

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Chung-Ju Chang

Jing-Win Wong

Jung-Hui Chiu

Department of Communication Engineering and Center for Telecommunications Research, National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan, China

Hardware Department, Taisel, Alcatel, Taiwan, China

Department of Electronics Technology, National Taiwan Institute of Technology, Taiwan, China


Available online 24 June 2003.

Abstract

Two service strategies for packet voice communication networks are studied by simulation in this paper. The first one is the first-packet-first-priority (FPFP) service strategy. This strategy gives the packet firstly generated in a talkspurt the first priority. The second one is the maximum-delay-first-serve (MDFS) service strategy. This strategy gives the more delayed voice packet the higher priority. The FPFP and the MDFS strategies are proposed in order to match with the null timing information (NTI) and the complete timing information (CTI) reassembly schemes adopted at a packet voice receiver in Barberis and Pazzaglia's “Analysis and optimal design of a packet voice receiver”, respectively, to improve the network performance. These two strategies are also compared with the simple first-in-first-out (FIFO) service strategy. The results show that the MDFS strategy has the smallest delay variation and loss rate of voice packet, the FIFO strategy has the middle values, while the FPFP strategy has the maximum.

Author Keywords: packet voice communication network; first-packet-first-priority service strategy; maximum-delay-first-serve service strategy; null timing information reassembly scheme; complete timing information reassembly scheme

Article Outline

• References

 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.