ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
Geomorphology
Volume 6, Issue 3, March 1993, Pages 225-242
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Purchase PDF (1848 K)

Article Toolbox
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/0169-555X(93)90048-7    
How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)

Copyright © 1993 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Channel responses to declining flow on the Rio Grande between Ft. Quitman and Presidio, Texas

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Benjamin EverittCorresponding Author Contact Information, a

aState of Utah, Division of Water Resources, 1636 W. North Temple, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, USA


Received 21 February 1992; 
accepted 15 August 1992. 
Available online 8 April 2003.

Abstract

A profound decline in the discharge of the upper Rio Grande following upstream water development set in motion a chain of responses in channel geometry and sediment budget. The case of the Rio Grande provides a well-documented example of the evolution of channel geometry in response to change in a single external variable.

In a regime of declining flow, channel change was driven by an excess of sediment relative to the energy available to do work in the stream channel. Several different responses can be identified, which operated at different rates. Responses can be ranked according to reaction time, to define 3 stages in channel evolution. Stage I is identified as the shrinking of the channel as excess sediment was deposited within it. During Stage II channel capacity began to stabilize as overbank flow carried sediment onto natural levees and floodplain. Valley-wide aggradation began, and avulsive migration resumed, especially at the mouths of tributaries. Where Stage III is occurring, lag deposits of bedload at tributary mouths are locally regrading the valley.

Initial shrinking of the channel produced positive feedback to the decrease in discharge and sediment transport capacity. Not until later stages did subordinate responses appear which tended to balance the sediment budget, and these involved lateral migration. The river approached a balanced sediment budget both by increasing its capacity by shortening and steepening, and by decreasing sediment inout by migrating away from tributaries.


Corresponding Author Contact InformationCorrespondence to: B. Everitt, State of Utah, Division of Wales Resources, 1636 W. North Temple, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, USA.

Geomorphology
Volume 6, Issue 3, March 1993, Pages 225-242
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.