Review
Copying and sexual selection

https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(92)90050-LGet rights and content

Abstract

Recent studies of a variety of polygynously mating animals indicate that females do not always choose mates independently, but instead may copy the choices of others. Copying could serve either to increase the accuracy of mate assessment or to reduce its costs. It is also likely to affect the intensity of sexual selection.

References (33)

  • W.J. Shields et al.
  • A. Balmford

    Trends Ecol. Evol.

    (1991)
  • A. Marconato et al.

    Anim. Behav.

    (1986)
  • S.M. Shuster

    Anim. Behav.

    (1990)
  • I.G. Jamieson et al.

    Anim. Behav.

    (1989)
  • M. Petrie et al.

    Anim. Behav.

    (1991)
  • R. Boyd et al.

    Culture and the Evolutionary Process

    (1985)
  • I.A. Stamps

    Am. Nat.

    (1987)
  • J.A. Stamps

    Am. Nat.

    (1988)
  • R.R. Warner

    Nature

    (1988)
  • J. Maynard Smith

    Trends Ecol. Evol.

    (1991)
  • R.M. Gibson et al.

    Behav. Ecol.

    (1991)
  • M.W. Wade et al.
  • T.H. Clutton-Brock et al.

    Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.

    (1988)
  • T.H. Clutton-Brock et al.

    Nature

    (1989)
  • Cited by (178)

    • The influence of model quality on self-other mate choice copying

      2021, Personality and Individual Differences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Such behavior can reduce the cost of mate selection, and avoid potential loss caused by mate selection failure. By observing and imitating the behavior of other individuals who have succeeded in mate selection, the ability to distinguish between good and bad mates is enhanced (e.g., Gibson & Höglund, 1992; Nordell & Valone, 1998). Research on mate choice copying is valuable for understanding individuals' mate choice behaviors and strategies (Gouda-Vossos et al., 2018).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text