Towards a more realistic psychology of economic socialization

https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(93)90027-IGet rights and content

Abstract

In this paper we argue that current research into economic socialisation is unsatisfactory for two main reasons. Most researchers have tended to regard the meaning of the term ‘economic’ as static and given and so have taken an adult-centred view of the child's world and investigated only those domains which are obviously economic (working, spending, borrowing, saving etc.). Secondly, researchers have concentrated almost exclusively on the question of cognitive development and so have asked ‘how do children come to understand the economic world of grown-ups’ and not ‘how do children solve the economic problems they are faced with’. We propose that researchers should be more concerned with the real economic world of childhood and we describe a few investigations that we have done in the style we favour. We conclude by discussing the implications of this approach for the future of economic psychology.

References (28)

  • S. Henry

    The Hidden Economy

    (1978)
  • G. Hussein

    An examination of the psychological aspects of money

    (1985)
  • S.E.G. Lea

    Assessing the psychology of economic behaviour and cognition

  • S.E.G. Lea et al.

    The Individual in the Economy

    (1987)
  • Cited by (19)

    • Prospective thinking and decision making in primary school age children

      2017, Heliyon
      Citation Excerpt :

      As a matter of fact, monetary-unrelated bargaining in children can be considered economic because carried out with the intention to maximize a certain profit (Sonuga-Barke and Webley, 1993) and it is closer to the children’s world based on their social understanding of notions like reciprocity. Since the children could choose among different options, the items represented equally salient incentives according to personal preference and allowed us to join the children's social and economic world, in which monetary incentives − when bargaining − are not as significant as for adults (see also, Webley, 2005; Webley and Lea, 1993; Furnham, 2008; for review, see Marchetti and Castelli, 2012). Delay of gratification was assessed through an intertemporal choice task, and namely the Marshmallow Task (MT).

    • Adolescent-adult interactions and culture in the ultimatum game

      2006, Journal of Economic Psychology
      Citation Excerpt :

      This may include their independent consumption decisions (Krause & Harbaugh, 1999) as well as their influence on the economic decisions of adults (Harbaugh, Krause, & Liday, 2003; Murnighan & Saxon, 1998). In addition, the study of children and adolescents may reveal much about the origins of adult decision making and their economic arrangements generally (Harbaugh, Krause, & Berry, 2000; Webley & Lea, 1993). In particular, Krause and Harbaugh (1999) as well as Camerer (2003) argue that research of this type may contribute towards a nature versus nurture debate with respect to economic decision making, i.e. to what extent the reasoning processes and preferences which economists study are the product of genetic inheritance or learning.

    • Ultimatum bargaining by children and adults

      1998, Journal of Economic Psychology
    • Money: Motivation, metaphors, and mores

      2006, Behavioral and Brain Sciences
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    An earlier version of this paper was presented at the First European Colloquium on ‘Towards an understanding of youth life-styles and consumption patterns’, Paris 26–27 September 1991.

    View full text