Alternative covariance estimators of the standard Tobit model

https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(93)90166-AGet rights and content

Abstract

A number of alternative estimators for the coefficients of a Tobit model have been proposed in the literature. The covariance matrix of ML estimates is typically associated with the algorithm applied to maximize the likelihood. Covariance estimators used in practice are derived by: (1) the Hessian (observed information), (2) the matrix of outer products of the first derivatives of the log-likelihood (OPG version), (3) the expected Hessian (estimated information), (4) a mixture of (1) and (2) (White's QML covariance matrix). Significant differences among estimates are usually interpreted as an indication of misspecification. From our Monte Carlo study this seems not to be true, unless the sample size is really very large. Even in the absence of misspecification, large differences are encountered in small samples, and the sign of the differences is almost systematic. This suggests that the choice of the covariance estimator is not neutral and the results of hypotheses testing may be strongly affected by such a choice.

References (15)

  • T. Amemiya

    Tobit models: A survey

    Journal of Econometrics

    (1984)
  • T. Amemiya

    Advanced econometrics

    (1985)
  • d'Italia Banca

    Modello Mensile del Mercato Monetario, Banca d'Italia

    (1988)
  • E.R. Berndt et al.

    Estimation and interference in non-linear structural models

    Annals of Economic and Social Measurements

    (1974)
  • G. Calzolari et al.

    Alternative estimators of FIML covariance matrix: A Monte Carlo study

    Econometrica

    (1988)
  • G. Calzolari et al.

    Finite sample performance of the rebust Wald test in simultaneous equation systems

  • R.C. Fair

    A note on computation of the Tobit estimates

    Econometrica

    (1977)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Some preliminary results of this work where discussed at the 6th World Congress of the Econometric Society (Barcelona, 1990), and at the econometrics seminars of Tilburg, Birmingham and Padova Universities. C. Dustmann, G. Imbens R.W. Parks, N.E. Savin and participants to conference and seminars are gratefully acknowledged for stimulating discussions. Responsibility remains fully with the authors. Financial support from MURST 40% funds is also gratefully acknowledged.

View full text