Feature
The National Birth Center Study: Part II—Intrapartum and immediate postpartum and neonatal care

https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-2182(92)90239-YGet rights and content

Abstract

Part II of a three-part report of the National Birth Center Study describes care provided to 11,814 women and their newborns during and after labor and delivery until they were transferred or discharged from the birth centers. There were few low birth weight or preterm or postterm births, but more macrosomic babies than among all U.S. births during the same time period. Certified nurse-midwives provided most of the intrapartum care, which is described in the context of medically recommended standards and data that describe care provided to low-risk women giving birth in U.S. hospitals. Birth center care deviated from typical hospital care in several ways. Birth center clients were much less likely to receive central nervous system depressants, anesthesia, continuous electronic fetal monitoring, induction and/or augmentation of labor, intravenous infusions, amniotomies, or episiotomies, and they had relatively few vaginal examinations. They were more likely to eat solid food during labor and to take showers and/or baths Nulliparity was strongly associated with longer first stage labors and longer labor was associated with more frequent use of many kinds of interventions Infant birth weight, mother's position during delivery, and forceps- or vacuum-assisted deliveries are examined in relation to episiotomies and lacerations and tears.

References (87)

  • AM Flynn et al.

    Ambulation in labor

    Br Med J

    (1978)
  • N Brozan

    Women gain as technology becomes part of natural birth

    New York Times

    (November 13, 1988)
  • J Cherry et al.

    Comparison of hospital charges generated by certified nurse-midwives' and physicians' clients

    J Nurse Midwifery

    (1982)
  • CW Nichols

    The Yale nurse-midwifery practice: addressing the outcomes

    J Nurse Midwifery

    (1985)
  • LD Platt et al.

    Nurse-midwifery in a large teaching hospital

    Obstet Gynecol

    (1985)
  • HM Kaminski et al.

    The effect of epidural analgesia on the frequency of instrumental obstetric delivery

    Obstet Gynecol

    (1987)
  • L Borgatta et al.

    Association of episiotomy and delivery position and deep perineal laceration during spontaneous delivery in nulliparous women

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (1989)
  • JGB Russell

    Moulding of the pelvic outlet

    Br J Obstet Gynaecol

    (1969)
  • R Pomeroy

    Shall we cut and reconstruct the perineum for every primipara?

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (1918)
  • LD Odell et al.

    Episiotomy blood loss

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (1947)
  • M Newton et al.

    Blood loss during and immediately after delivery

    Obstet Gynecol

    (1961)
  • PM Nodine et al.

    Factors associated with perineal outcome during childbirth

    J Nurse Midwifery

    (1987)
  • SR Fischer

    Factors associated with the occurrence of perineal lacerations

    J Nurse Midwifery

    (1979)
  • MD Avery et al.

    Effect of perineal massage on the incidence of episiotomy and perineal laceration in a nurse-midwifery service

    J Nurse Midwifery

    (1986)
  • MD Avery et al.

    Perineal massage: effect on the incidence of episiotomy and laceration in a nulliparous population

    J Nurse Midwifery

    (1987)
  • LS Formato

    Routine prophylactic episiotomy: is it always necessary?

    J Nurse Midwifery

    (1985)
  • NL Bowe

    Intact perineum: a slow delivery of the head does not adversely affect the outcome of the newborn

    J Nurse Midwifery

    (1981)
  • MH Bromberg

    Presumptive maternal benefits of routine episiotomy: a literature review

    J Nurse Midwifery

    (1986)
  • National Center for Health Statis tics. 1989 Vital Statistics of the United States, Vol. 1, Natality (Table 1–171)....
  • Health Insurance Association of America

    The cost of having a baby

    (1982)
  • P Simkin

    Just another day in a woman's life? women's long-term perceptions of their first birth experience, part I

    Birth

    (1991)
  • American Academy of Pediatrics and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

    Guidelines for perinatal care

  • National Center for Health Statistics

    Advance report of final natality statistics, 1986. Monthly vital statistics report

  • National Center for Health Statistics
  • KG Keppel et al.

    Methods and response characteristics, 1980 National Natality and Fetal Mortality Surveys

    Vital and Health Statistics, Series 2

    DHHS Pub. No. (PHS) 86-1374

    (1986)
  • M Sanderson et al.

    The 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey: design, content, and data availability

    Birth

    (1991)
  • ML Reid et al.

    Prenatal care and cost-effectiveness: changes in health expenditures and birth outcome following the establishment of a nurse-midwive program

    Med Care

    (1979)
  • Institute of Medicine

    Preventing low birthweight

    Institute of Medicine

    Preventing low birthweight

  • SM Taffel

    Association between maternal weight gain and outcome of pregnancy

    J Nurse Midwifery

    (1986)
  • J Broach et al.

    Food and beverages in labor, part I: cross-cultural and historical practices

    Birth

    (1988)
  • MJ Douglas

    Commentary: the case against a more liberal food and fluid policy in labor

    Birth

    (1988)
  • DK Lehmann et al.

    The epidemiology and pathology of maternal mortality: Charity Hospital of Louisiana in New Orleans 1965–1984

    Obstet Gynecol

    (1987)
  • PJ Placek et al.

    Recent patterns in cesarean delivery in the United States

    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am

    (1988)
  • Cited by (46)

    • What do women want? Valuing women's preferences and estimating demand for alternative models of maternity care using a discrete choice experiment

      2017, Health Policy
      Citation Excerpt :

      In particular, women may choose between two models of care at hospital level: consultant-led care and midwifery-led care. Although some women have expressed concerns regarding the safety of care in MLUs [6], internationally, midwifery-led care has been found to be associated with fewer interventions and comparable adverse outcomes when compared with consultant-led care [7–11]. Women also report higher satisfaction levels following care in a MLU [8], which may be due, in part, to continuity of care.

    • What women want: Exploring pregnant women's preferences for alternative models of maternity care

      2017, Health Policy
      Citation Excerpt :

      The trial also found that interventions during childbirth were fewer in a MLU and a normal birth in a MLU saved the state €57 compared with a normal birth in a CLU. The results echoed international evidence [9–12], and have been the subject of widespread discussion and research in recent years [13–16]. Nevertheless, maternity care in Ireland remains heavily medicalised [17].

    • The American Association of Birth Centers: History, Membership, and Current Initiatives

      2009, Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health
      Citation Excerpt :

      Two key areas that are being targeted for change are the creation of a federal Medicaid facility fee for birth centers by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the reimbursement rate for CNMs under Medicare Part B. While birth center care has been shown to be a safe,9 high quality,9,18-21 and cost-effective22,23 alternative for the delivery of low-risk women,24 it is difficult to quantify absolute cost differences between women who choose to birth in hospitals and women who deliver in birth centers because of self-selected bias, crossover between groups, and differences among providers.23 However, the birth center model of care results in fewer operative births and medical procedures without sacrificing neonatal or maternal outcomes.22,23,25

    • A review of issues surrounding medically elective cesarean delivery

      2007, JOGNN - Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing
      Citation Excerpt :

      Declercq et al. (2007) reported lengths of stay for planned vaginal births that were 23% shorter (2.4 to 4.3 days) than for planned cesarean delivery. In women planning vaginal births in birth centers (Jackson et al., 2003; Rooks, Weatherby, & Ernst, 1992), lengths of stay were even shorter, with the average discharge occurring between 4 and 12 hours postpartum. Rehospitalization Another factor in the economic impact of planned vaginal birth versus planned cesarean delivery was the increased rate of maternal readmission following cesarean delivery (Liu et al., 2005: Lydon‐Rochelle et al., 2000).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Judith P. Rooks, CNM, MS, MPH, conducts research and assists a variety of national and international organizations to plan and evaluate projects and programs related to maternal and child health care and family planning services. She lives in Portland, Oregon.

    View full text