Along the road: R & D, society and space

doi:10.1016/0048-7333(94)00793-7

Research Policy

Volume 24, Issue 5, September 1995, Pages 707-726

https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)00793-7 Get rights and content

Abstract

Despite an expanding critique, the idea of the linear model of R & D (and the inequalities implicit within it) still holds sway in what Rosenberg (Science and Public Policy, 1991, 18, 335–346) has termed “our roadmap of the science/technology relationship”. In constructing a new map, we must first recognize R & D as having a social and spatial, as well as a technical, content. In the paper this approach is used to analyse four case studies of the R & D process. In each case, the company conceptualises the R & D process in terms of linearity but it doesn't work quite like that in practice. The variations are not major, but neither are they insignificant. Moreover, they do seem to be associated with social and spatial modifications of the inequalities inherent, or potentially present, in the pure linear model. Maybe if these companies could think less in terms of the linear model, and stop measuring their actual, complex practice against it and thereby conceiving of that complexity as in some way a deficiency, then further positive moves away from the linear model could be made.

References (23)

J. Howells
The location and organisation of research and development: New horizons
Research Policy
(1990)
E.J. Malecki
Dimensions of R&D location in the United States
Research Policy
(1980)
E.J. Malecki
The R&D location decision of the firm and creative regions-a survey
Technovation
(1987)
I. Begg et al.
When the chips are down South
The Guardian
(1989)
P. Cooke et al.
Uneasy alliances: The spatial development of computing and communications markets
Regional Studies
(1991)
P. Davies
Let them eat crumbs
The Guardian
(1989)
C. Freeman
The Economics of Industrial Innovation
(1982)
J. Gregson
Gwent's Imperial Science Park
Sunday Observer
(1992)
P. Hall et al.
Western Sunrise: The Genesis and Growth of Britain's Major High Tech Corridor
(1987)

E. von Hippel

The Sources of Innovation

(1988)

Cited by (16)

There and back again: Revisiting Vannevar Bush, the linear model, and the freedom of science
2022, Research Policy
Citation Excerpt :
It is rare to see a notion which some claim to be a foundational concept of modern science policy and something no one in their right mind believes. It is baffling to witness claims that the “linear model of innovation is the key reference point for understanding the relationship between science, technology and economic development” (Henry et al., 1995, 708) alongside Rosenberg's off-quoted statement that “[e]verybody knows that the [linear model] is dead” (Rosenberg, 1991, 331; see also Freeman, 1996, 27; Mirowski, 2011, 47). This presence of such polar opposite claims can be explained by the ambiguity of what is meant by ‘the linear model.’
Despite its age, Vannevar Bushs Science: The Endless Frontier has remained a touchstone for science funding policy discussions. More specifically, many claim that Bush ushered in a new ‘social contract’ that allowed scientists to freely choose projects in accordance with their own interests while promising deliverables for the society that funds scientific institutions. Despite the prominence of The Endless Frontier, there are countless interpretations of its argumentative structure. Building off others, I develop an interpretation of how the linear model relates to the freedom of science in SEF. I critically assess this view and argue that it provides a valuable starting point for a social contract for the 21st century. To accomplish this, I clarify Bush's stance on the linear model and show that it bypasses the most common objections against its plausibility, consider the relationship between Bush's conception of the freedom of science and the rise of citizen science, and articulate a more nuanced approach to government intervention in research priority setting.
Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters
2005, Research Policy
Citation Excerpt :
Science parks are, thus, an example of a planned innovative milieu comprised of firms with a high level of internal resources and competence, situated within weak local co-operative environments. These parks have generally failed to develop innovative networks based on inter-firm co-operation and interactive learning within the science parks themselves (Asheim and Cooke, 1998; Henry et al., 1995). Technopoles, as developed in countries, such as France, Japan and Taiwan, are also characterised by a limited degree of innovative interaction between firms within the pole, and by vertical subcontracting relationships with non-local external firms.
The analysis of the importance of different types of regional innovation systems must take place within a context of the actual knowledge base of various industries in the economy, as the innovation processes of firms are strongly shaped by their specific knowledge base. In this paper, we shall distinguish between two types of knowledge base: analytical and synthetic. These types indicate different mixes of tacit and codified knowledge, codification possibilities and limits, qualifications and skills, required organisations and institutions involved, as well as specific competitive challenges from a globalising economy, which have different implications for different sectors of industry, and, thus, for the kind of innovation support needed. The traditional constellation of industrial clusters surrounded by innovation supporting organisations, constituting a regional innovation system, is nearly always to be found in contexts of industries with a synthetic knowledge base (e.g. engineering-based industries), while the existence of regional innovation systems as an integral part of a cluster will normally be the case of industries-based on an analytical knowledge base (e.g. science-based industries, such as IT and bio-tech). In the discussion of different types of regional innovation systems five empirical illustrations from a Nordic comparative project on SMEs and regional innovation systems will be used: the furniture industry in Salling, Denmark; the wireless communication industry in North Jutland, Denmark; the functional food industry in Scania, Sweden; the food industry in Rogaland, Norway and the electronics industry in Horten, Norway. We argue that in terms of innovation policy the regional level often provides a grounded approach embedded in networks of actors acknowledging the importance of the knowledge base of an industry.
On the new economic geography of post-Fordist learning economies
2018, Voices from the North: New Trends in Nordic Human Geography
A tribute to Doreen Massey (3 January 1944–11 March 2016)
2016, Progress in Human Geography
Network Structures in Regional Innovation Systems
2016, European Planning Studies
Co-innovation competence: A strategic approach to entrepreneurship in regional innovation structures
2013, Co-Innovation Competence: A Strategic Approach to Entrepreneurship in Regional Innovation Structures

View all citing articles on Scopus

View full text

Along the road: R & D, society and space

Abstract

Research Policy

Research Policy

Technovation

When the chips are down South

The Guardian

Uneasy alliances: The spatial development of computing and communications markets

Regional Studies

Let them eat crumbs

The Guardian

The Economics of Industrial Innovation

Gwent's Imperial Science Park

Sunday Observer

Western Sunrise: The Genesis and Growth of Britain's Major High Tech Corridor

The Sources of Innovation