Have UK venture capitalists a bias against investment in new technology-based firms?

doi:10.1016/0048-7333(93)00767-N

Research Policy

Volume 24, Issue 2, March 1995, Pages 283-299

https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(93)00767-N Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper addresses the important question for innovation policy of whether or not UK venture capital firms show a bias against investing in technology-based, new and young enterprises. The evidence from UK and US industry statistics indicates that, pro rate, American venture capital invest nearly three times as much finance into technology-based, start-up and early-stage investments as their UK counterparts when later stage, MBO/LBO investments are removed from the data. US venture capital firms are also more likely to invest at the earlier stages of investment, while the UK industry has increasingly come to be dominated by management buy-outs/buy-ins and other later-stage, refinancing activities.

In 1991, a postal survey was conducted of 40 investing firms from a population of 75 UK venture capitalists which currently invest, or are prepared to consider investing, in technology-based companies. The sample was segregated into ‘generalist funds’ and ‘technology specialists’ depending on the percentage (greater or less than 50%) of technology-based investee companies within the venture capitalists' current portfolios. The results confirmed that technology projects had to meet more rigorous selection criteria than non-technology projects. In undertaking technology-based project evaluations, investors imposed higher investment return ‘hurdle rates’ at each stage of investment other than seed capital. Technology-based projects were also more frequently required to address minimum markets greater than the UK alone when compared to other investment categories. No material bias was found between the actions of generalist and specialist funds towards technology-based projects. The ratio of technology-based projects offered to technology-based projects accepted was similar for both groups.

References (35)

R. Dixon
Venture Capital and the Appraisal of Investments
Omega
(1991)
I.C. MacMillan et al.
Venture Capitalists' Involvement in their Investments: Extent and Performance
Journal of Business Venturing
(1989)
Advisory Council On Science and Technology (ACOST)
The Enterprise Challenge: Overcoming Barriers to Growth in Small Firms
(1990)
G. Bannock
Venture Capital and the Equity Gap
(1991)
G. Batty
Entrepreneurship in the Nineties
(1990)
R. Brealey et al.
Principles of Corporate Finance
(1984)
British Venture Capital Association
British Venture Capital Association
Report on Investment Activity
(1993)
A.V. Bruno et al.
The One that Got Away: A Study of Ventures Rejected by Venture Capitalists
R.L. Butchart
A New Definition of the High Technology Industries

W.D. Bygrave et al.

Venture Capital at the Crossroads

(1992)

Centre for Management Buy-Out Research

UK Management Buy-Outs 1992

(1992)

J. Davie

Finding and Keeping Good Venture Capital Managers

European Venture Capital Association

N.L. Goslin et al.

Entrepreneurial Qualities Considered in Venture Capital Support

J.A. Kay

Identifying the Strategic Market

Business Strategy Review

(Spring 1990)

T. Lorenz

Venture Capital Today

(1989)

Cited by (98)

Financing Irish high-tech SMEs: The analysis of capital structure
2022, International Review of Financial Analysis
Citation Excerpt :
Results such as this paint an illustrative picture of the high-tech sector's relationship with equity. It is further emphasised by the finding that VC firms seek larger returns from high-tech firms than any other type of projects and the findings support this standing (Murray, Lott, & Have, 1995). However, economic growth can have an important role, as Paik and Woo (2014) illustrate how a decrease in the economy can instigate VC firms to prioritise investing in older stage traditional businesses This is accurate when combined with the previously discussed variables particularly that of experience which along with high return rates tend to favour the use of equity financing.
This paper analyses the capital structure of high-tech SMEs based in Ireland examining the determinants which influence the financing options. The main contribution of this paper is to provide analysis on the capital structure financing choices of the high-tech sector, and provide a new insight into the financing of high-tech SMEs through primary data.
Regarding the primary data utilised in this paper, an original questionnaire was completed by high-tech SMEs in Ireland, which provides data that is novel and focused. The importance of internal sources particularly retained earnings is found amongst older firms. A change from equity finance to debt occurs within high-tech SMEs over time, while the relationship between the banking sector and high-tech firms has not improved over the past few years. Regression analysis finds a negative relationship between the use of incubators and accelerators with profitability. While a positive relationship between intangible assets and internal finance exists, while firms with previous start-up experience have a positive affiliation with equity finance. Additionally, the descriptive findings provide a thorough overview of the issues of financing and the paper presents data on intangible assets and human capital perspectives not often found in secondary databases. This combined with regression analysis, provides original novel insights into the capital structure of high-tech SMEs and the importance of firm characteristics.
Venture capital investment in university spin-offs: Evidence from an emerging economy
2022, Journal of Corporate Finance
From a policy perspective, university spin-offs (USOs) with venture capital (VC) investment are most promising because they are growth-oriented and contribute most prominently to economic growth. Hence, effective policies should consider the motivation of VC investment in USOs. By employing a manually collected novel database that includes all listed high-tech USOs and related VC investment activities prior to initial public offering (IPO) in China over the past three decades, we observe a close relationship between a multi-layered second-tier stock market and a vibrant VC market for USO financing. We find that USOs receive less investment from government VCs and mixed-VC syndicates and receive their investment in an earlier stage than non-USOs but that private VCs have no funding bias against USOs. The result implies the presence of crowding-in effect of government VCs in the context of USO financing. Moreover, VC investment in USOs is more pronounced in deals that have a higher initial equity commitment of academic founders and a noncontrolling strategy, highlighting the importance of delivering “value”, “commitment”, and “trust” signals in winning VC funding. Finally, as private VCs in the form of limited partnerships behave like typical pre-IPO-stage investors, they barely demonstrate any significant preference over these factors.
Sustaining trust to cross the Valley of Death: A retrospective study of business angels’ investment and reinvestment decisions
2022, Technovation
This paper explores and explains how, why and with what consequences business angels' trust in the entrepreneur affects their decisions to invest, reinvest or withdraw funding in the Valley of Death (VoD). Drawing on the VoD literature and on business angel research, we retrospectively study two contrastive cases of success and failure of French start-ups operating in the IT sector over a period of two and nine years, respectively, by taking the dyadic relationship between business angels and entrepreneurs as unit of analysis. We document the business angels' trust evolution over time and we show how trust shifts facilitate or damage the entrepreneurs' journey through the VoD. We offer a process-model of sustaining business angels’ trust in entrepreneur-business angel relationships to cross the VoD, thus addressing recent calls for more in-depth examinations of social aspects in investment and post-investment business angel research.
The equity gap and knowledge-based firms
2018, Journal of Corporate Finance
The equity gap, the difference between the amount of (risk) capital that would be invested under conditions of well-informed and competitive markets and the amount of capital actually invested, covers both startups and ventures moving beyond startup to the establishment and early growth phase. We provide estimates for the size of the equity gap for firms facing later stage financing issues, the second equity gap. This ‘second’ equity gap relates to a second so-called ‘valley of death’ in financing the growth phase, and is particularly pertinent for knowledge-intensive (KI) firms. We utilize a unique panel database covering the population of limited companies, which includes 2852 VC backed companies and 4048 deals. Using propensity scoring methods and multivariate models determining investment demand we screen the corporate population for potential VC investments and estimate the size of the equity gap in total and the KI firms that face, potentially, the second equity gap as a subset of our total estimates.
Buybacks as an efficient strategy for venture capital in emerging markets
2017, Pacific Basin Finance Journal
Governmental venture capital in Europe: Screening and certification
2016, Journal of Business Venturing
Citation Excerpt :
The potential agency conflicts that are associated with information asymmetries between VC managers and entrepreneurs are mitigated by using monitoring and staging mechanisms (Gompers, 1995; Kaplan and Strömberg, 2001). However, notwithstanding VC investors' superior abilities to address information asymmetries, the entrepreneurial finance literature has shown that an equity gap remains for many entrepreneurial companies, especially companies in the earliest stages of development (Kelly, 2011; Lockett et al., 2002; Murray and Lott, 1995). Furthermore, VC investors may be affected by “herding” attitudes that are typical of institutional investors (Devenow and Welch, 1996) and concentrate on only a few industries that are deemed to have the highest growth potential (Lerner, 2002) or only on core regions at the expense of peripheral, economically lagging regions (Harrison and Mason, 1992; Sunley et al., 2005).
This paper investigates the screening and certification abilities of government-managed venture capital (GVC) firms in Europe. Using a sample of European high-tech entrepreneurial companies, we show that GVC funding increases the likelihood that companies will receive private venture capital (PVC). Moreover, GVC-funded companies that have received a first round of PVC are at least as likely as other PVC-backed companies to receive a second round of PVC or to be listed or acquired. After ruling out alternative explanations, we interpret these results as positive evidence of GVC firms' abilities in selecting promising companies and certifying them to PVC investors.

View all citing articles on Scopus

^☆: This paper is based on research conducted for an MBA dissertation completed by Jonathan Lott while an MBA student at Warwick Business School, 1990/91. The study was supervised by Gordon Murray.

View full text

Have UK venture capitalists a bias against investment in new technology-based firms?☆

Abstract

Omega

Journal of Business Venturing

The Enterprise Challenge: Overcoming Barriers to Growth in Small Firms

Venture Capital and the Equity Gap

Entrepreneurship in the Nineties

Principles of Corporate Finance

Report on Investment Activity

The One that Got Away: A Study of Ventures Rejected by Venture Capitalists

A New Definition of the High Technology Industries