Elsevier

Vision Research

Volume 26, Issue 7, 1986, Pages 1099-1109
Vision Research

Matching velocity in central and peripheral vision

https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(86)90044-1Get rights and content

Abstract

The apparent velocity of peripheral, drifting sinusoidal gratings was measured as a function of eccentricity and viewing distance. Gratings appeared to move more slowly in the periphery. Apparent velocities in fovea and periphery could be matched by an appropriate spatial scaling of peripheral gratings. This scaling factor provides a psychophysical measure of the changing spatial grain of the visual system with eccentricity. Scaling factors were found to be the same for lower threshold of motion and for velocity matching with standard gratings of 2 and 6 Hz. The finding generalised over a range of standard temporal frequencies (< 7 Hz) and spatial frequencies (1.2–9 c/deg). The psychophysically determined scaling factors were found to be proportional to the square root of macaque mean cortical receptive field area as a function of eccentricity. The data support a ratio strategy for encoding motion in which motion information is expressed relative to the changing spatial grain of the visual system. Locations for the apparent identity of physically identical grating motion fell along a straight line in space, prompting an explanation of these visual field effects in terms of the acquisition of environmental information from optic flow.

References (48)

  • P.D. Tynan et al.

    Motion processing in peripheral vision: reaction time and perceived velocity

    Vision Res.

    (1982)
  • D.C. Van Essen et al.

    The visual field representation in striate cortex of the macaque monkey: asymmetries, anisotropies, and individual variability

    Vision Res.

    (1984)
  • V. Virsu et al.

    Temporal contrast sensitivity and cortical magnification

    Vision Res.

    (1982)
  • A.B. Watson et al.

    Discrimination at threshold: labelled detectors in human vision

    Vision Res.

    (1981)
  • M.J. Wright et al.

    Spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity and visual field locus

    Vision Res.

    (1983)
  • M.J. Wright et al.

    Invariant tuning of motion after effect

    Vision Res.

    (1985)
  • M.J. Wright et al.

    The relationship of displacement thresholds for oscillating gratings to cortical magnification, spatiotemporal frequency and contrast

    Vision Res.

    (1985)
  • S. Bisti et al.

    Spatial frequency characteristics of neurones of area 18 in the cat: dependence on the velocity of the visual stimulus

    J. Physiol.

    (1985)
  • J.F. Brown

    The visual perception of velocity

    Psychol. Forsch.

    (1931)
  • F.W. Campbell et al.

    Stopped visual motion

    Nature

    (1979)
  • A. Cowey et al.

    Human cortical magnification factor and its relation to visual acuity

    Expl Brain Res.

    (1974)
  • A.J. van Doorn et al.

    Temporal properties of the visual detectability of moving spatial white noise

    Expl Brain. Res.

    (1982)
  • B.M. Dow et al.

    Magnification factor and receptive field size in foveal striate cortex of the monkey

    Expl Brain Res.

    (1981)
  • N. Drasdo

    The neural representation of visual space

    Sature

    (1977)
  • Cited by (76)

    • Perceived speed at low luminance: Lights out for the Bayesian observer?

      2022, Vision Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Some of these errors can depend on the way basic stimulus properties affect sensor output, and others on the way different sensors interact with each other. Examples of the former include the influence of contrast, spatial frequency and retinal location on perceived speed (Johnston & Wright, 1985; Smith & Edgar, 1991; Thompson, 1982); examples of the latter include the many types of simultaneous contrast illusion known to exist (Bosten & Mollon, 2010). The second broad category of explanation is ‘top-down’ and appeals to the influence of higher-level factors, such as prior knowledge about the world (Gregory, 1997; Teufel & Fletcher, 2020).

    • Speed change detection in foveal and peripheral vision

      2012, Vision Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      With regards to the neuronal substrate, perceptual effects of prolonged motion adaptation have been consistently attributed to mechanisms at the stage of V1: In psychophysical studies, reductions of perceived speed have been shown to transfer interocularly, indicating at least a cortical locus of motion adaptation (Cohen, 1965; Hunzelmann & Spillmann, 1984). Johnston and Wright (1986) have demonstrated that perceived speed scales inversely with the mean receptive field size of V1 neurons. Clifford and Wenderoth (1999) found that improvements in differential sensitivity by adaptation can be induced solely by temporal flicker without any net motion direction, which would be required to activate motion sensitive neurons beyond V1, specifically in area MT. In electrophysiological experiments, time constants of reductions in firing rate of V1 neurons have been shown to be similar to those of perceptual effects of adaptation (Giaschi et al., 1993; Vautin & Berkley, 1977).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text