The visual fields of the tawny owl, Strix aluco L

doi:10.1016/0042-6989(84)90005-1

Vision Research

Volume 24, Issue 12, 1984, Pages 1739-1741, 1743-1751

https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(84)90005-1 Get rights and content

Abstract

The uniocular retinal field of Strix aluco is highly asymmetrical. The maximum width of 124° is less than that recorded in any other vertebrate. Maximum retinal binocular field width equals 48° and the optic axes diverge by 55°. Maximum binocularity occurs above the bill whose tip lies outside of the visual field. The Cyclopean retinal field has a maximum width of 201°. Limited data on the visual fields of the pigeon are also presented. All of these data are compared with visual field widths in other species and the significance of the owl eye's tubular shape, its nasad asymmetry and the possible factors influencing binocular field width are discussed.

Reference (49)

BowmakerJ.K. et al.
Visual pigments and colour vision in a nocturnal bird, Strix aluco (tawny owl)
Vision Res.
(1978)
HughesA.
A schematic eye for the rat
Vision Res.
(1979)
HughesA. et al.
The refractive state of the rabbit eye: variation with eccentricity and correction for oblique astigmatism
Vision Res.
(1978)
MartinG.R. et al.
Visual acuity in the tawny owl (Strix aluco)
Vision Res.
(1974)
MartinG.R. et al.
The retinal binocular field of the pigeon (Columba livia: English racing homer)
Vision Res.
(1983)
MartinoyaC. et al.
Limits of the pigeon's binocular field and direction for best binocular viewing
Vision Res.
(1981)
SnyderA.W. et al.
Information capacity of eyes
Vision Res.
(1977)
SteinbachM.J. et al.
Eye movements of the owl
Vision Res.
(1973)
ThornF. et al.
Human binocular summation at absolute threshold
Vision Res.
(1974)
VakkurG.J. et al.
The schematic eye in the cat
Vision Res.
(1963)

BlakeR. et al.

The psychophysical inquiry into binocular summation

Percept. Psychophys

(1973)

BurtonJ.A.

Owls of the World

(1973)

Duke-ElderS.

The Eye in Evolution

EmsleyH.H.

Visual Optics

(1948)

FiteK. et al.

A comparative study of deep avian foveas

Brain Behav. Ecol.

(1975)

FoxR.

Binocularity and stereopsis in the evolution of vertebrate vision

FriedmanM.B.

How birds use their eyes

GibsonJ.J.

The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception

(1979)

HardyA.R.

Hunting ranges and feeding ecology of owls in farmland

HironsG.J.M.

A population study of the tawny owl (Strix aluco) and its main prey species in a woodland

HughesA.

A schematic eye for the rabbit

Vision Res.

(1972)

HughesA.

A supplement to the cat schematic eye

Vision Res.

(1976)

HughesA.

The topography of vision in mammals of contrasting life style: Comparative optics and retinal organisation

JonesR.K. et al.

Why two eyes are better than one: the two views of binocular vision

J. exp. Psychol. HPP.

(1981)

Cited by (84)

Visual adaptations of diurnal and nocturnal raptors
2020, Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology
Citation Excerpt :
In the Tawny owl (Strix aluco), each of the tubular eyes has a relatively narrow visual field of ≈120° width, and the visual axes of the eyes diverge by 55° ([18]; Fig. 3) – a large angle compared to humans, which have parallel visual axes, but smaller than many other birds (see [9]). This results in a cyclopean field (horizontal extension of the visual fields of the two eyes) of 201°, a frontal binocular field of 71° vertical and maximally 48° horizontal extension, and a blind sector of 159° horizontal extension behind the head [18]. These visual fields are fixed, because the large eyes of owls are positioned partly outside the skull, and the orbital muscles that mainly hold them in place, can only move them within the socket by less than 1.5° (Great horned owl (Bubo virginianus); [19].
Raptors have always fascinated mankind, owls for their highly sensitive vision, and eagles for their high visual acuity. We summarize what is presently known about the eyes as well as the visual abilities of these birds, and point out knowledge gaps. We discuss visual fields, eye movements, accommodation, ocular media transmittance, spectral sensitivity, retinal anatomy and what is known about visual pathways. The specific adaptations of owls to dim-light vision include large corneal diameters compared to axial (and focal) length, a rod-dominated retina and low spatial and temporal resolution of vision. Adaptations of diurnal raptors to high acuity vision in bright light include rod- and double cone-free foveae, high cone and retinal ganglion cell densities and high temporal resolution. We point out that more studies, preferably using behavioural and non-invasive methods, are desirable.
Modeling visual fields using virtual ophthalmoscopy: Incorporating geometrical optics, morphometrics, and 3D visualization to validate an interdisciplinary technique
2020, Vision Research
Citation Excerpt :
Traits of interest included (Fig. 2): (1) sizes of anterior and posterior segments, (2) diameters and axial lengths of eyeball and lens, (3) radii of curvature of cornea and lens, (4) indices of refraction of the optical media of the eye (cornea, aqueous, lens, vitreous), (5) posterior nodal distance, and (6) magnitude of binocular overlap and size of blind spots as measured behaviorally. Eight species were found for which all of these quantities had been measured or quantitatively inferred: (1) pigeon, Columba livia (Marshall, Mellerio, & Palmer, 1973; Martin & Young, 1983; Martinoya, Rey, & Bloch, 1981), (2) rook, Corvus frugilegus (Browne, Kelly, Culloty, Davenport, & Deeny, 2007; Troscianko et al., 2012), (3) Manx shearwater, Puffinus puffinus (Martin & Brooke, 1991), (4) Humboldt penguin, Spheniscus humboldti (Martin & Young, 1984; Sivak, Howland, & McGill-Harelstad, 1987), (5) tawny owl, Strix aluco (Martin, 1982, 1984), (6) ostrich, Struthio camelus (Martin & Katzir, 1995; Martin, Ashash, & Katzir, 2001), (7) European starling, Sturnus vulgaris (Martin, 1986a), and (8) barn owl, Tyto alba (Knudsen, 1982; Schaeffel & Wagner, 1996). Four species were found for which visual fields had been measured, and several but not all of the aforementioned quantities had been measured or inferred: (1) mallard, Anas platyrhynchos (Kreuzer & Sivak, 1985; Martin, 1986b; Sivak & Kreuzer, 1983; Sivak, Hildebrand, & Lebert, 1985), (2) red-tailed hawk, Buteo jamaicensis (Beer, 1892; Glasser, Pardue, Andison, & Sivak, 1997; Labelle et al., 2012; Lord, 1956; O’Rourke et al., 2010), (3) American kestrel, Falco sparverius (Andison, Sivak, & Bird, 1992; Frost, Wise, Morgan, & Bird, 1990; Labelle et al., 2012; Lord, 1956; O’Rourke et al., 2010), (4) great cormorant, Phalacrocorax carbo (Katzir & Howland, 2003; Martin et al., 2008).
Visual fields are of particular interest to comparative biologists studying the complex interplay between anatomy, physiology, ecology, and optics. Visual fields have been measured in nearly 100 bird species, and investigators have uncovered associations between quantitative aspects of visual fields and foraging behavior, skull dimensions, and even brain morphology. However, limiting factors including time, access to living subjects, and experimental constraints complicate study of the visual apparatus of rare, endangered, or extinct species. We introduce a modeling technique called virtual ophthalmoscopy (VO) for estimating visual fields of vertebrates. We compare this in-silico technique, which draws on geometrical optics, morphometrics of eyes, and 3D visualization, against experimental data from 12 bird species from behavioral literature. Known values of optical properties, including axial length, lens curvatures, and refractive index, are used to construct and test virtual, schematic eyes in ray-tracing software. Resulting visual fields are measured in 3D-visualization software. These measurements are compared qualitatively and quantitatively with visual fields from the literature. Schematic eyeballs and in-silico visual fields, after iterative improvements using anatomical information from cadaveric specimens, approximate experimental data to the extent of falling within the range of intraspecific variation, suggesting VO is a viable technique for modeling visual fields. Virtual ophthalmoscopy creates an opportunity to expand the sample of species for which visual fields can be quantified and allows new hypotheses regarding the evolution of visual systems to be tested.
Gaze sensitivity: Function and mechanisms from sensory and cognitive perspectives
2014, Animal Behaviour
Sensitivity to the gaze of other individuals has long been a primary focus in sociocognitive research on humans and other animals. Information about where others are looking may often be of adaptive value in social interactions and predator avoidance, but studies across a range of taxa indicate there are substantial differences in the extent to which animals obtain and use information about other individuals' gaze direction. As the literature expands, it is becoming increasingly difficult to make comparisons across taxa as experiments adopt and adjust different methodologies to account for differences between species in their socioecology, sensory systems and possibly also their underlying cognitive mechanisms. Furthermore, as more species are found to exhibit gaze sensitivity, more terminology arises to describe the behaviours. To clarify the field, we propose a restricted nomenclature that defines gaze sensitivity in terms of observable behaviour, independent of the underlying mechanisms. This is particularly useful in nonhuman animal studies where cognitive interpretations are ambiguous. We then describe how socioecological factors may influence whether species will attend to gaze cues, and suggest links between ultimate factors and proximate mechanisms such as cognition and perception. In particular, we argue that variation in sensory systems, such as retinal specializations and the position of the eyes, will determine whether gaze cues (e.g. head movement) are perceivable during visual fixation. We end by making methodological recommendations on how to apply these variations in socioecology and visual systems to advance the field of gaze research.
Gaze tracking of large-billed crows (Corvus macrorhynchos) in a motion capture system
2024, Journal of Experimental Biology
Binocular field configuration in owls: The role of foraging ecology
2023, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
The visual fields of the Harpy Eagle (Harpia harpyja)
2023, Journal of Ornithology

View all citing articles on Scopus

^*: Also Department of Extramural Studies.

View full text