Orientation illusions and after-effects: Inhibition between channels
References (34)
- et al.
The simultaneous spatial frequency shift: a dissociation between the detection and perception of gratings
Vision Res.
(1974) The colour specificity of spatial adaptation: red-blue interactions
Vision Res.
(1974)- et al.
The effect of background density on the Zöllner illusion
Vision Res.
(1969) - et al.
The spatial selectivity of the tilt aftereffect
Vision Res.
(1974) - et al.
Detection of complex gratings by the human visual system (in preparation)
(1975) - et al.
Evidence for a physiological explanation of the waterfall phenomenon and figural aftereffects
Nature, Lond.
(1963) - et al.
On the existence of neurons in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images
J. Physiol., Lond.
(1969) - et al.
Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the human visual system
Nature, Lond.
(1970) - et al.
Lateral thinking about lateral inhibition
Nature, Lond.
(1971) - et al.
The orientation specificty of two visual aftereffects
J. Physiol., Lond.
(1971)
Size adaptation: a new aftereffect
Science, N.Y.
Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the cat's visual cortex
Expl Brain Res.
Interactions between orientations in human vision
Expl Brain Res.
Is there lateral inhibition in the visual cortex
Nature, New Biol.
An intra-cellular analysis of visual cortical neurones to moving stimuli: responses in a cooperative neuronal network
Expl Brain Res.
Is spatial adaptation an aftereffect of prolonged inhibition
J. Physiol., Lond.
Neurophysiological contrast phenomena and figural aftereffects
Psychol. Rev.
Cited by (104)
Temporal resolution and temporal extent of orientation repulsion
2022, Vision ResearchCitation Excerpt :Repulsion becomes maximal when the target and inducer orientations differ by 10–20° and may change to assimilation when they differ by 75–80° (for a review, see Clifford, 2014). Although the static properties of orientation repulsion, such as spatial frequency selectivity (Georgeson, 1973), color selectivity (Clifford, Pearson, et al., 2003; Clifford, Spehar, et al., 2003), cue invariance (Smith, Clifford, & Wenderoth, 2001), interocular transfer (Forte & Clifford, 2005; Wade, 1980), contrast dependency (Pearson & Clifford, 2005; Tolhurst & Thompson, 1975), target–inducer distance dependency (Mareschal & Clifford, 2013; Virsu & Taskinen, 1975), and grouping/segmentation dependency (Durant & Clifford, 2006; Qiu, Kersten, & Olman, 2013), have been extensively investigated, little is known about its dynamic properties. A temporal parameter known to be critical for repulsion is the target–inducer stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA).
A review of visual aftereffects in schizophrenia
2019, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral ReviewsCitation Excerpt :This type of change in neural responsivity over time is commonly observed at the single-neuron level (Albrecht et al., 1984; Barlow and Hill, 1963; Kohn and Movshon, 2003), and there is no doubt that it happens during aftereffect paradigms. The perceptual phenomena that define aftereffects, however, are likely the result of a more complex interplay between many neurons that differ in the degree to which their responsivity is affected during the adaptation period (Grunewald and Lankheet, 1996; Mather, 1980; Sutherland, 1961; Tolhurst and Thompson, 1975). For instance, the perception of a contour's orientation is plausibly rooted in the collective pattern of neural responses among neurons that are tuned to orientation, i.e. that each responds optimally to a given, preferred, orientation and less to different orientations.
How visual short-term memory maintenance modulates the encoding of external input: Evidence from concurrent visual adaptation and TMS
2013, NeuroImageCitation Excerpt :Furthermore, the inhibition of visual input by VSTM appears to be stronger when they contain the same features and thus activate the same feature-specific mechanisms in the visual system. In the present study, this is likely to have involved competition within the orientation channels (e.g. Blakemore and Campbell, 1969; Campbell and Maffei, 1971; Tolhurst and Thompson, 1975), with the engagement of orientation channels by VSTM making them less sensitive to visual input. The reduction of TAE magnitude by concurrent VSTM maintenance of matching orientation was most robust when both the adapter and the memory cue had an orientation of 20°; this reduction was found in all the experiments reported here (including Experiment 1d where attentional allocation to the adapter was ensured with catch trials).
Cascaded Bayesian processes: An account of bias in orientation perception
2009, Vision Research