ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Surface Science
Volume 364, Issue 3, 1 September 1996, Pages 431-438
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Purchase PDF (649 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/0039-6028(96)00646-2    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 1996 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.

Surface science

The TiO2(100)(1 × 3) reconstruction: insights from ab initio calculations

P. J. D. Lindana, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, N. M. Harrisona, J. M. Holenderb, M. J. Gillanb and M. C. Paynec

a Daresbury Laboratory, WA4 4AD, Warrington, UK b Physics Department, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, Keele, UK c Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, CB3 0HE, Cambridge, UK

Received 21 December 1995; 
accepted 26 February 1996. ;
Available online 2 March 1999.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

First-principles plane-wave pseudopotential calculations based on density functional theory within the local-density approximation have been performed on the unreconstructed TiO2(100) surface and its (1 × 2) and (1 × 3) reconstructions, which consist of alternate (110) and (1Image 0) microfacets. The calculations, which include full relaxation of all ionic coordinates, show that there is no driving force for reconstruction in the stoichiometric material. The pattern of displacements on the (110) microfacets formed by the (1 × 3) reconstruction is qualitatively similar to those on the unreconstructed (110) surface. However, the energy of the reconstructed surface is considerably lower than that predicted by multiplying the (110) surface energy by the appropriate geometrical factor. Surprisingly, this difference is due to additional electronic relaxation in the reconstructed system, and not to the effects of structural relaxation.

Author Keywords: Computer simulations; Density functional calculations; Faceting; Low index single crystal surfaces; Surface energy; Surface relaxation and reconstruction; Titanium oxide

Article Outline

• References

Surface Science
Volume 364, Issue 3, 1 September 1996, Pages 431-438
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.