ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Surface Science
Volume 173, Issue 1, 1 August 1986, Pages L582-L589
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Purchase PDF (597 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/0039-6028(86)90099-3    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 1986 Published by Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Surface science letters

Modification of Cu-H bonding near a Ru(0001) surface

Peter J. Feibelman

D. R. Hamann

Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185, USA AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974, USA

Received 31 March 1986; 
accepted 14 April 1986. 
Available online 30 August 2002.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

Surface linearized augmented plane wave (SLAPW) total energy calculations are used to study differences between Cu-H bonding on Cu(111) and on a pseudomorphic Cu monolayer on a Ru(0001) substrate. Bond lengths and vibration frequencies for H(1 × 1)/Cu(1 × 1)/Ru(0001) versus H(1 × 1)/Cu(111) roughly obey an “effective medium” picture: the H atoms prefer to reside at a particular clean-surface charge density (0.013–0.015 au), and vibrate along the surface normal with a frequency, ωperpendicular, proportional to the local, clean-surface normal charge density gradient. This results in a predicted 20% reduction of ωperpendicular on Cu(1 × 1)/Ru(0001) surface relative to ωperpendicular for Cu(111). At the same time, the weakening of the Cu-Cu bond when a Cu(111) layer is strained to fit pseudomorphically on Ru(0001) is partially compensated by the fact that the Cu-Ru bonding is stronger than Cu-Cu. Thus the binding energy of a H monolayer on Cu(1 × 1)/Ru(0001) is calculated to be only 0.05 eV/H greater than on Cu(111).

Article Outline

• References

Surface Science
Volume 173, Issue 1, 1 August 1986, Pages L582-L589
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.