Elsevier

Physiology & Behavior

Volume 50, Issue 6, December 1991, Pages 1197-1203
Physiology & Behavior

Article
The ability of pigs to control their protein intake when fed in three different ways

https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(91)90582-9Get rights and content

Abstract

The ability of pigs to control their protein intake was tested in three different ways. When pigs were offered access to single feeds of different protein contents, at a constant liveweight of 20 kg, they increased their daily feed intake as the protein content of their feed was decreased (long-term protein intake regulation). When the protein content of their feed was altered daily, pigs consumed consistently higher amounts of feed when they had access to a low protein feed rather than to a high protein one (short-term protein intake regulation). When, finally, they were given a choice between two feeds of different protein contents, pigs selected a diet that met their protein requirements (as judged by their growth rates and feed efficiencies) and avoided excess of protein intake, but only if they had had previous experience of both feeds. It is suggested that pigs first need to learn about the feeds that are subsequently offered as a choice, before they can make correct dietary choices.

References (30)

  • T.M. Evvard

    The pigs versus the feeding standards

  • C.P. Freeman

    The tryptophan requirements of broiler chicks

    Br. Poult. Sci.

    (1979)
  • A.E. Harper

    Effects of dietary protein content and amino acid pattern on food intake and preference

  • A.E. Harper

    Amino acid excess

  • A.E. Harper et al.

    Nutrients in food intake

  • Cited by (70)

    • Live black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens) provisioning is a promising environmental enrichment for pigs as indicated by feed- and enrichment-preference tests

      2021, Applied Animal Behaviour Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is possible that long-term nutritional consequences for the pigs may have played a role, although with the current set-up this is unlikely. Kyriazakis et al. (1991) claimed that pigs adapted their feed intake to the nutritional composition of the diet only when they had sufficient time to experience the nutritional consequences. Pigs may have experienced the nutritional consequences of consuming the feed items during the first week of habituation in T1 and T2, when each item was available throughout one day.

    • Taste, teleology and macronutrient intake

      2021, Current Opinion in Physiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, the importance of taste in this regard is questionable. Some evidence suggests taste alone allows rapid identification of dietary protein sources in protein-depleted rats [24], but the preponderance of evidence indicates selection in rodents and other animals depends on post-ingestive learning where the sensory signal only acquires predictive power based on an association with a corrective post-ingestive outcome [25,26]. Second, a number of essential amino acids are effective taste stimuli, but a number of these elicit unpleasant sensations (e.g. methionine, leucine, tryptophan) and render protein hydrolysates unpalatable.

    • Influence of mild feed restriction and mild reduction in dietary amino acid content on feeding behaviour of group-housed growing pigs

      2018, Applied Animal Behaviour Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Other studies found that mild deficiencies in protein, lysine or threonine resulted in increased feed intake (Ferguson and Gous, 1997; Henry, 1995; Chiba et al., 2002). Moreover, Kyriazakis et al. (1991) showed that pigs were able to control their protein intake when they had free access to feeds with differing protein contents. In this regard, reduced levels of tryptophan in the diet increased the feeding activities of pigs under AL conditions (Dalcin Castilha et al., 2016), and a similar effect was observed by Jensen et al. (1993) as a consequence of dietary CP restriction.

    • Where and what to feed? Differential effects on fecundity and longevity in the invasive Drosophila suzukii

      2017, Basic and Applied Ecology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Initially focusing on the energy intake for an individual (optimal foraging theory, MacArthur & Pianka 1966; Ydenberg, Welham, Schmid-Hempel, Schmid-Hempel, & Beauchamp 1994; Raubenheimer et al. 2009), studies on nutrition have shifted toward a more realistic approach, taking into account the nutrient composition of food and that animals must optimize their food intake of both energetic macronutrients (carbohydrates, proteins, lipids) and/or non-energetic nutrients (water, mineral salts, vitamins, antioxidants). Dealing with the multi-dimensionality of food sources, some species are able to regulate their intake of food to reach an optimal ratio of nutrient intake (Fanson, Yap, & Taylor 2012; Kyriazakis, Emmans, & Whittemore 1991; Lee et al. 2008; Raubenheimer & Simpson 1997; see Behmer (2009) for review of insect herbivores). In insects, the decision to select a specific resource depends on factors such as nutritional status, previous feeding experience, mating status, and egg load in the ovary (Behmer 2009; Jervis, Ellers, & Harvey 2008; Minkenberg, Tatar, & Rosenheim 1992).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text