ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
Pattern Recognition
Volume 23, Issues 3-4, 1990, Pages 291-309
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Purchase PDF (2007 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/0031-3203(90)90017-F    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 1990 Published by Elsevier Science B.V.

Texture feature performance for image segmentation

J. M. H. du Buf, M. Kardan and M. Spann

Signal Processing Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, EPFL-Ecublems, 1015, Luasanne, Switzerland

Received 12 April 1989; 
revised 16 May 1989. 
Available online 19 May 2003.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

This paper describes a comparative study of texture features, with particular emphasis on the applicability to unsupervised image segmentation. A benchmark test is introduced in which a set of 20 simple bipartite images, combining different stochastic textures separated by a stochastic boundary, is used for feature extraction and segmentation. The accuracy of the segmentation result, expressed in the mean boundary error, is used as an evaluation criterion. From the seven feature extraction methods tested, the Haralick, Laws and Unser methods gave best overall results. Results obtained also show that direct feature statistics such as the Bhattacharyya distance are not appropriate evaluation criteria if texture features are used for image segmentation. A small experiment on visual boundary tracking revealed that boundary error obtained here are similar to those obtained by machine segmentation.

Author Keywords: Texture features; Image segmentation; Comparative test; Boundary errors; Visual boundary tracking

Article Outline

• References

 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.