Cluster analysis reveals at least three, and possibly five distinct handedness groups

doi:10.1016/0028-3932(92)90110-8

Neuropsychologia

Volume 30, Issue 4, April 1992, Pages 373-380

https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(92)90110-8 Get rights and content

Abstract

Multivariate techniques have used data from hand preference questionnaires to group hand preference items, but no attempt has been made to date to use multivariate analyses to group individuals in terms of handedness groups. This study analyzed the responses of 645 subjects on the Waterloo 60-item handedness questionnaire with a cluster analysis (BMDP) in order to determine the grouping of individuals in terms of hand preference patterns. Five distinct handedness groups were recognized by this procedure and a Discriminant Function Analysis revealed a very high accuracy of assigning individuals to the five groups. A cluster analysis of a shorter 14-item questionnaire suggested three distinct handedness groups, and the degree of accuracy of assigning individuals to these groups was also very high. As is the case with all multivariate techniques in neuropsychology, the question of whether the clusters form meaningful groupings awaits an answer in terms of their different neuropsychological properties.

References (13)

J.M. Healey et al.
Handedness is not a unidimensional trait
Cortex
(1986)
R.C. Oldfield
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory
Neurospychologia
(1971)
M. Peters
Phenotype in normal left-handers: An understanding of phenotype is the basis for understanding mechanism and inheritance of handedness
M. Peters
Subclassification of left-handers poses problems for theories of handedness
Neuropsychologia
(1990)
R.E. Steenhuis et al.
Different dimensions of hand preference that relate to skilled and unskilled activities
Cortex
(1989)
S.M. Williams
Factor analysis of the Edinburgh handedness inventory
Cortex
(1986)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (85)

Measurement of Laterality and Its Relevance for Sports
2016, Laterality in Sports: Theories and Applications
This chapter describes the theoretical assumptions underlying the definitions and measurements of laterality and discusses the lack of clarity regarding the different interpretations of laterality. The issue is described on the one hand from an assessment point of view, discussing current methods of measurement in accordance to the three main assessment tools: performance tasks, preference tasks, and self-report questionnaires. The most widely used assessment tool is evaluated more in depth. On the other hand a test theoretical perspective on laterality is given including both classical and probabilistic test theory. The chapter shows that there is a lack of appropriate methods to indicate laterality, which can lead to major misinterpretations, and that there is an apparent need for a clearer and a more consistent definition, as well as for laterality tests for specific populations. Considering laterality assessments, it can only be valid to the degree of which the underlying concept itself is valid. The authors suggest defining laterality as a latent trait and using probabilistic models (IRT models) in future research to help to enhance the structural understanding of laterality.
Effect of spatial constraint of the environment on the hand preference in reaching task in young adults
2015, Revista Brasileira de Ciencias do Esporte
A preferência manual (direção e magnitude) na tarefa de alcançar em adultos foi analisada em função da localização espacial de um objeto no ambiente. Trinta participantes fizeram a tarefa de alcançar um cilindro, devendo‐se escolher apenas uma das mãos para fazer a tarefa, a 50 cm de distância em cinco posições diferentes em relação ao plano sagital do participante. Duas condições foram cumpridas: conforto (sem restrição da velocidade) e velocidade (movimento feito o mais rapidamente possível). Anova de Friedman apontou diferença (X²_30,9 = 122,17; p < 0,001) e o teste de Wilcoxon apontou maiores escores nas posições de 90°, 120° e 150° em comparação com 30° e 60° para ambas as condições (p < 0,01) demonstrando alcances ipsilaterais. Tais resultados foram explicados pela restrição biomecânica para fazer a tarefa, modulando a preferência manual, de acordo com a localização espacial dos objetos no ambiente.
The manual preference in a reaching task in adults was analyzed according to the spatial location of an object in the environment. Thirty participants performed the task of reaching a cylinder, with one hand, at 50 cm distance in five different positions in relation to the sagittal plane of the participant. Two conditions were performed: comfort and speed. Friedman’ s ANOVA showed difference (X²_30,9 = 122.17; p < 0.001) and the Wilcoxon’ s test showed higher scores at positions 90°, 120° and 150° in comparison 30° and 60°, for both conditions (p < 0.01) showing ipsilateral reaches. These results were explained by the biomechanics restriction to perform the task, modulating the manual preference, according to the spatial location of objects in the environment.
Se analizó la preferencia manual en una tarea de alcance en adultos en función de la ubicación espacial de un objeto en el entorno. Treinta participantes realizaron la tarea de alcanzar un cilindro, con una sola mano, a una distancia de 50 cm en cinco posiciones diferentes en relación con el plano sagital del participante. Dos condiciones se cumplieron: comodidad y velocidad. La prueba ANOVA de Friedman mostró una diferencia (χ²_30,9 = 122,17; p < 0,001) y la prueba de Wilcoxon mostró puntuaciones más altas en las posiciones de 90̊, 120̊ y 150̊ en comparación con las de 30̊ y 60̊, en ambas condiciones (p < 0,01), lo que demostró alcances ipsilaterales. Estos resultados se debieron a la biomecánica de restricción para realizar la tarea mediante la modulación de la preferencia manual, de acuerdo con la ubicación espacial de los objetos en el entorno.
On the use (and misuse?) of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory
2015, Brain and Cognition
Citation Excerpt :
Dragovic (2004b) argued that only individuals whose scores have an absolute value greater than 50 should be classified as left- or right-handed. According to Dragovic, individuals who score closer to zero are more properly characterized as mixed-handed and should be differentiated from more consistent individuals (for a similar argument based on a different handedness inventory, see Peters & Murphy, 1992). This argument is supported by the aforementioned finding that consistency affects many neuropsychological phenomena.
Researchers who study human cognition and behavior, especially from a neuroscience perspective, often measure subjects’ handedness. The most common measure of handedness is the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI; Oldfield, 1971). Several potential problems with the EHI have been identified during its long history. We informally observed that individual researchers have adopted a variety of modified versions of the EHI, each addressing perceived shortcomings in its own way. To confirm this, we reviewed 899 articles reporting usage of the EHI from 1998 to 2012. For those articles reporting details of the instrument used, we coded information about test items, response format, and scheme for classifying individuals as right-handed. We found tremendous diversity in all three components of the inventory, confirming that many variants of the EHI are used in contemporary research. We furthermore report evidence that researchers who use variants may be unaware that they are not using the original instrument. Variant usage appears to be largely ad hoc and lacking any semblance of uniformity within the scientific community. We discuss how highly variable usage of the EHI may imperil efforts to produce replicable and convergent research findings, and we offer recommendations for future action.
The flinders handedness survey (FLANDERS): A brief measure of skilled hand preference
2013, Cortex
Citation Excerpt :
This may be relevant to how people with an intermediate hand preference were classified. For example, Peters and Murphy (1992) referred to individuals with an intermediate hand preference as ‘inconsistent left’. The current data suggest that some of the people in this cluster were, in actual fact, inconsistent right responders.
Knowing whether an individual prefers the left or right hand for skilled activities is important to researchers in experimental psychology and neuroscience. The current study reports on a new measure of skilled hand preference derived from the Provins and Cunliffe (1972) handedness inventory. Undergraduates (n = 3324) indicated their lateral preference for their hands, feet, eyes and ears. A measure of hand performance and familial handedness was also obtained. Factor analysis identified ten items that loaded on skilled hand preference and these were included in the new FLANDERS questionnaire. Cluster analysis of the new questionnaire revealed three distinct groups (left-, mixed- & right-handed). The new test showed a strong association with other measures of lateral preference and hand performance. Scores on the test were also related to the sex of the respondent and the hand preference of their parents. The FLANDERS provides a measure of skilled hand preference that is easy to administer and understand and should be useful for experimenters wanting to screen for hand preference.
Exploring Footedness, Throwing Arm, and Handedness as Predictors of Eyedness Using Cluster Analysis and Machine Learning: Implications for the Origins of Behavioural Asymmetries
2024, Symmetry
Playing style of women and men elite table tennis players
2024, International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport

View all citing articles on Scopus

View full text

Cluster analysis reveals at least three, and possibly five distinct handedness groups

Abstract

Cortex

Neurospychologia

Neuropsychologia

Cortex

Cortex