Report
Oceanic plastic particle pollution: Suspected effect on fat deposition in red phalaropes

https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-326X(82)90490-8Get rights and content

Abstract

In a sample of seven red phalaropes (Phalaropus fulicarius: Aves) collected from a flock of 6000 late spring migrants, six stomachs contained plastic particles. A negative correlation between amount of plastic and fat condition suggests a detrimental effect of a widespread oceanic pollutant on a marine bird.

References (18)

  • H Hays et al.

    Plastic particles found in tern pellets, on coastal beaches and at factory sites

    Mar. Pollut. Bull.

    (1974)
  • S. Ashkenazie et al.

    Time-energy budget of the semipalmated sandpiper Calidris pusilla at Barrow, Alaska

    Ecology

    (1979)
  • D.M. Baltz et al.

    Evidence from seabirds of plastic pollution off central California

    West. Bird

    (1976)
  • T.H. Below

    First reports of pellet ejection in 11 species

    Wilson Bull.

    (1979)
  • S.I. Bond

    Red Phalarope mortality in southern California

    Calif. Birds

    (1971)
  • R.G.B. Brown

    Seabirds as marine animals

  • E.J. Carpenter et al.

    Plastics on the Sargasso Sea surface

    Science

    (1972)
  • E.J. Carpenter et al.

    Polystyrene spherules in coastal waters

    Science

    (1972)
  • J.B. Colton et al.

    Plastic particles in surface waters of the northwestern Atlantic

    Science

    (1974)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (74)

  • Are plastic particles reduced in size in seabirds' stomachs?

    2021, Marine Pollution Bulletin
    Citation Excerpt :

    Impacts include filling of stomachs resulting in satiation and reduced foraging, starvation from interference with digestive processes, and physical damage or obstruction. Absorption of toxic chemicals from plastic particles could also lead to declines in animals' overall health or endocrine disruption (Conners and Smith, 1982; Day et al., 1985; Ryan and Jackson, 1987; Ogi, 1990; Moore and Phillips, 2011; Lavers et al., 2014). Stomach plastic also has been used as a bioindicator.

  • Microplastic's story

    2021, Marine Pollution Bulletin
  • Spatial and temporal analysis of meso- and microplastic pollution in the Ligurian and Tyrrhenian Seas

    2020, Marine Pollution Bulletin
    Citation Excerpt :

    In studies whose focus was fish collected from Mediterranean waters, it was shown that as much as 58% of the fish residing near the surface had ingested microplastic particles and as much as 33% of fish which live and feed at the sea bottom ingested microplastics (Bellas et al., 2016; Güven et al., 2017). The effects of ingesting these particles have been shown in laboratory studies to range from inflammation to decreased feeding and growth rates and even starvation for various species (Connors and Smith, 1982; Moore, 2008; Von Moos et al., 2012; Watts et al., 2015). Filter feeding organisms common in the region are also known to ingest microplastic particles, with as much as 46% of mussels sampled for study containing plastic particles (Digka et al., 2018).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text