Long-term memory search: An intersecting activation process

https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5371(76)90053-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Subjects memorized subject-verb-object propositions and then judged whether verb-object probes appeared in the same proposition. Propositions either were connected via a common subject or were unconnected. Number of propositions associated with particular verbs and objects (fan) was also manipulated. Judgments were made under accuracy or speed emphasis. Reaction times and error rates were directly related to fan. Connectedness significantly increased reaction times and error rates for negative judgments. The data are consistent with a model which assumes that activation spreads from probe concepts in parallel through the propositional network, at a rate which varies inversely with the number of paths it must follow. When two sources of activation intersect, a positive response is generated. If no intersection is detected within some period of time, a negative response is initiated. A guessing model for errors was shown to account satisfactorily for all relationships between reaction times and errors in the data, including speed-accuracy trade-off effects, while assuming that memory search processes remain constant.

Reference (19)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (33)

  • A Spreading Activation Theory of Memory

    2013, Readings in Cognitive Science: A Perspective from Psychology and Artificial Intelligence
  • Modeling fan effects on the time course of associative recognition

    2012, Cognitive Psychology
    Citation Excerpt :

    After memorizing the facts during a study phase, subjects perform a recognition task during a test phase in which they have to distinguish between targets (studied facts) and foils (non-studied facts, which are usually rearranged items from the studied facts; e.g., The detective is in the park). The main finding from fan manipulations in the fact retrieval paradigm is the fan effect: recognition takes longer for items with higher fans (e.g., Anderson, 1974; King & Anderson, 1976; Pirolli & Anderson, 1985; for reviews, see Anderson, 2007; Anderson & Reder, 1999). Recognition accuracy also tends to be lower for items with higher fans, as reflected in higher false alarm rates but mixed effects on hit rates (Dyne, Humphreys, Bain, & Pike, 1990; Verde, 2004; see also Postman, 1976).

  • A spreading activation theory of memory

    1983, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
View all citing articles on Scopus

This research was supported in part by NSF Grant No. GB-40298 to J. Anderson and in part by the Office of the Advanced Research Projects Agency, under Order No. 1949, and was monitored by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research under Contract No. F 44620-72-C-0019 to the Human Performance Center.

View full text