Larval settlement into marine soft-sediment systems: Interactions with the meiofauna

https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(86)90076-6Get rights and content

Abstract

The distribution and abundance of organisms exhibiting complex life cycles, like marine invertebrates, reflect ecological processes operating at all stages in the life history. Few studies have yet considered the mortality patterns of larvae and juveniles. To test whether the permanent meiofauna play a role in macrofaunal larval site-selection, and/or if permanent meiofaunal predators or competitors and disturbers are a significant source of mortality for newly settled macrofaunal juveniles, a series of manipulations of meiofauna were performed. Densities of (1) predatory turbellarians alone, and (2) other meiofauna, were increased in small boxes placed on a holding table in a shallow subtidal habitat. Natural settlement into meiofauna manipulations was examined approximately monthly for a year. Other experiments were conducted to examine the relative importance of site-selection and post-settlement mortality and to determine if settlement was density-dependent or density-independent.

Densities of spionid, cirratulid, terebellid, capitellid, and maldanid polychaetes, oligochaetes, bivalves, and amphipods were all reduced by high densities of turbellarians, and sometimes by other meiofauna. Turbellarian predation was responsible for significant post-settlement mortality, but spionids, cirratulids, terebellids, and maldanids also appeared to avoid dense turbellarian treatments. Bivalve densities were reduced by high densities of other meiofauna, probably due to their sedimentary disturbance. Syllid polychaete densities were higher in turbellarian treatments, suggesting that they select for areas with high densities of their prey (small turbellarians). The effects of meiofauna on settlement and survival were greatest in spring and summer. The results of these experiments suggest larval settlement patterns and early juvenile survival should be considered in developing general models of life history and community structure for soft-sediment systems.

References (121)

  • J.A. Blake

    The larval development of Polychaeta from the northern California coast. I. Cirriformia spirabranchia (Family Cirratulidae)

    Trans. Am. Microsc. Soc.

    (1975)
  • G.A. Brenchley

    On the regulation of marine infaunal assemblages at the morphological level: a study of the interactions between sediment stabilizers, destabilizers, and their sedimentary environment

  • G.A. Brenchley

    Disturbance and community structure: an experimental study of bioturbation in marine soft-bottom communities

    J. Mar. Res.

    (1981)
  • J.L. Brooks et al.

    Predation, body size, and composition of plankton

    Science

    (1965)
  • L. Bush

    Biology of Neochildia fusca n. gen., n. sp. from the northeastern coast of the United States (Platyhelminthes : Turbellaria)

    Biol. Bull. (Woods Hole, Mass.)

    (1975)
  • H.M. Caffey

    Spatial and temporal variation in settlement and recruitment of intertidal barnacles

    Ecol. Monogr.

    (1985)
  • G.W. Calef

    Natural mortality of tadpoles in a population of Rana aurora

    Ecology

    (1973)
  • H. Caswell

    The evolution of “mixed” life histories in marine invertebrates and elsewhere

    Am. Nat.

    (1981)
  • J.A. Commito

    The importance of predation by infaunal polychaetes in controlling the structure of a soft-bottom community in Maine

    Mar. Biol.

    (1982)
  • J.H. Connell

    Effects of competition, predation by Thais lapillus and other factors on natural populations of the barnacle Balanus balanoides

    Ecol. Monogr.

    (1961)
  • J.H. Connell

    A predator-prey system in the marine intertidal region. I. Balanus glandula and several predator species of Thais

    Ecol. Monogr.

    (1970)
  • B.C. Coull et al.

    Long-term temporal variation and community dynamics of meiobenthic copepods

    Ecology

    (1977)
  • D.J. Crisp

    Factors influencing the settlement of marine invertebrate larvae

  • D.J. Cullen

    Bioturbation of superficial marine sediments by interstitial meiobenthos

    Nature (London)

    (1973)
  • R.P. Dales

    Notes on the reproduction and early development of the cirratulid Tharyx marioni (St. Joseph)

    J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K.

    (1951)
  • D.M. Dauer et al.

    Habitat expansion among polychaetous annelids repopulating a defaunated marine habitat

    Mar. Biol.

    (1976)
  • D. Dean

    On the reproduction and larval development of Streblospio benedicti Webster

    Biol. Bull. (Woods Hole, Mass.)

    (1965)
  • V.N. De Jonge et al.

    A simple density separation technique for quantitative isolation of meiobenthos using the colloidal silica LUDOX-AM

    Mar. Biol.

    (1977)
  • S.I. Dodson

    Complementary feeding niches sustained by size-selective predation

    Limnol. Oceanogr.

    (1970)
  • J. Dörjes

    Zur Ökologie der Acoela (Turbellaria) in der Deutschen Bucht

    Helgol. Wiss. Meeresunters.

    (1968)
  • A.E. Dunham

    An experimental study of interspecific competition between iguanid lizards Sceloporus merriami and Urosaurus ornatus

    Ecol. Monogr.

    (1980)
  • K. Fauchald et al.

    The diet of worms: a study of polychaete feeding guilds

    Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev.

    (1979)
  • P.W. Frank

    Life histories and community stability

    Ecology

    (1968)
  • O. Giere et al.

    Biology and ecology of marine Oligochaeta, a review

    Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev.

    (1982)
  • J.F. Grassle et al.

    Opportunistic life histories and genetic systems in marine benthic polychaetes

    J. Mar. Res.

    (1974)
  • J.S. Gray

    Animal-sediment relationships

    Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev.

    (1974)
  • R.K. Grosberg

    Competitive ability influences habitat choice in marine invertebrates

    Nature (London)

    (1981)
  • G.M. Hagerman et al.

    Dispersal of benthic meiofauna by wave and current action in Bogue Sound, North Carolina

    Mar. Ecol. P.S.Z.N.I.

    (1981)
  • L. Hannerz

    Larval development of the polychaete families Spionidae Sars, Disomidae Mesnil, and Poecilochaetidae n. fam. in the Gullmar Fjord (Sweden)

    Zool. Bidr. Uppsala

    (1956)
  • J.L. Harper

    The population biology of plants

  • M.E. Hay

    Herbivory, algal distribution, and the maintenance of between-habitat diversity on a tropical fringing reef

    Am. Nat.

    (1981)
  • R.C. Highsmith

    Induced settlement and metamorphosis of sand dollar (Dendraster excetricus) larvae in predator-free sites: adult sand dollar beds

    Ecology

    (1982)
  • R.D. Howard

    The influence of mate-defended oviposition sites on early embryo mortality in bullfrogs

    Ecology

    (1978)
  • J.H. Hunt

    The importance of adult-larval interactions in determining abundance patterns of soft-sediment infauna

  • L.H. Hyman

    The invertebrates. Platyhelminthes and Rhynchocoela, Vol. II

  • D. Jablonski et al.

    Larval ecology of marine benthic invertebrates: paleobiological implications

    Biol. Rev. Cambridge Philos. Soc.

    (1983)
  • P.A. Jumars et al.

    Between community contrasts in successful polychaete feeding strategies

  • T. Karling

    Turbellarian fauna of the Baltic proper. Identification, ecology, and biogeography

    Soc. Fauna Flora Fenn. Fauna Fenn.

    (1974)
  • W.C. Kerfoot

    Long-term replacement cycles in cladoceran communities: a history of predation

    Ecology

    (1981)
  • D.G. Kleinbaum et al.

    Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods

    • Cited by (68)

    • Community structure and productivity of Arctic benthic fauna across depth gradients during springtime

      2021, Deep-Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although our knowledge of the effects of macrofauna on meiofauna is still very limited, we know that macrofauna may markedly influence the occurrence, distribution and composition of meiofauna communities, both directly through predation and indirectly through alterations in biogeochemical characteristics of sediment and process rates (Ólafsson, 2003; Braeckman et al., 2011). The engineering activities of macrofauna organisms, such as bioturbation and bioirrigation, might facilitate the presence of meiofauna in deeper parts of sediment (Braeckman et al., 2010, 2011; Urban-Malinga et al., 2014), but meiofauna may also be affected by the macrofauna through predation (Watzin, 1983, 1986). Moreover, macrofauna organisms, though their feeding activities and movement, may increase or change small-scale habitat heterogenity and thus create new habitats for meiofauna (Warwick et al., 1986; Ullberg and Ólafsson, 2003; Bouchet et al., 2009).

    • High diversity, but low abundance of cryptobenthic fishes on soft sediment habitats in Southeast Asia

      2019, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      First, due to the extensive nature of the habitat, it might be more relevant to investigate species diversity on a larger scale by investigating regional diversity rather than small-scale (site level) diversity (Gray, 2002). Second, the lack of clear boundaries, higher uniformity, and typical sediment characteristics might allow for different migration and settlement dynamics compared to better studied habitats such as coral reef (Watzin, 1986; Butman, 1987). Therefore, defining appropriate boundaries of what makes up an ecoregion for fish fauna on soft sediment is an important challenge for future work.

    • The contrasting histories of marine and freshwater meiobenthic research – a result of differing life histories and adaptive strategies?

      2018, Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology
      Citation Excerpt :

      As he points out, “Life-history theories for marine animals cannot ignore a strong historical component stretching back to the origin of the metazoa”. In the present day, the meiobenthos can significantly depress the densities of newly-settled macrobenthic larvae, mainly by predation but also by competition and disturbance (Bell and Coull, 1980; Watzin, 1983, 1986). Predatory nematodes can take prey almost as large as themselves (Warwick, 1989) and predatory turbellarians even larger than themselves, including the young of macrobenthic taxa (Bilio, 1967; Straarup, 1970; Watzin, 1985) (Fig. 5).

    • Macrofaunal community structure in Bahía Concepción (Chile) before and after the 8.8 Mw Maule mega-earthquake and tsunami

      2017, Marine Environmental Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      This genus has been described as a widely distributed predator associated with fine sediment communities in shallow waters. Small prey are the most accessible source of food for juveniles of Nephtys (Caron et al., 2004) that, together with meiofauna predators, are a critical source of mortality of recruits settled in soft sediments (Watzin, 1986; Olafsson et al., 1994; Gosselin and Qian, 1997). Nephtys has the capacity to modify its diet in response to changes in environmental conditions (Olivier et al., 1993), behaving as an opportunistic organism that can respond to natural fluctuations in prey abundance (Olivier et al., 1993).

    • Effects of elevated CO<inf>2</inf> and temperature on an intertidal meiobenthic community

      2015, Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The macrofauna extracted from the same ASUs (Hale et al., 2011) are diverse in taxonomy, making them a source of ecological constraints (e.g., predation, competition for food resources) and disturbance of varying intensities to meiofauna (Dashfield et al., 2008; Ingels et al., 2014; Olafsson, 2003). It is also worth considering that the meiofauna may be a source of ecological constraints on macrofauna communities as they are also structured by interactions that occur when they are in the meiofaunal size category as larvae and juveniles (e.g., meiofauna preying on macrofauna larvae, Watzin (1983, 1986), Dahms et al. (2004)). Kennedy (1994), for instance, found evidence of predaceous nematodes and turbellarians ingesting a range of meiofaunal sized organisms including copepods, annelids, ostracods, halacarids and nematodes, giving valuable information in terms of their role in intertidal meiofauna communities as well as their role in trophic interactions.

    • Interactions between multiple large macrofauna species and nematode communities - Mechanisms for indirect impacts of trawling disturbance

      2014, Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Large macrofaunal bioturbating species, which may move through the sediment and disturb the 3D-matrix as they feed and find the most suitable position, are instrumental in setting and maintaining infaunal diversity and there is ample evidence that there are strong links between these species and their associated communities (e.g. Widdicombe et al., 2000). These benthic macrofaunal species are thought to affect meiofaunal assemblages through direct predation or non-selective feeding and through competition for food sources (Nascimento et al., 2011; Olafsson, 2003), but also meiofauna may affect the macrofauna assemblage through predation on settling larvae (Watzin, 1983, 1986). However, the effects of the macrofauna–meiofauna interaction may also be a result of the structural and biogeochemical changes associated with macrofauna presence and behaviour (Braeckman et al., 2010).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Present address: National Coastal Ecosystems Team, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1010 Gause Blvd., Slidell, LA 70458, U.S.A.

    View full text
    Copyright © 1986 Published by Elsevier B.V.