ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
advertisementadvertisement
International Journal of Mechanical Sciences
Volume 33, Issue 5, 1991, Pages 403-412
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Purchase PDF (415 K)

 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/0020-7403(91)90078-H    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)
Copyright © 1991 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.

Limit load analysis of a semi-infinite beam on rigid foundation

Ser Tong Quek and Chan Ghee Koh

Department of Civil Engineering, National University of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 0511

Received 30 May 1990; 
revised 5 November 1990. 
Available online 19 February 2003.

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Abstract

The limit load response of a semi-infinitely long elastic beam resting on a rigid foundation is investigated based on a small strain, large displacement formulation. Three applied loading conditions on the free end are considered, namely, a concentric fixed force and a moment, an eccentric fixed force, and an eccentric follower force. It is found that the results for the two fixed force cases can be taken as equivalent and will differ in general from the follower force case. For the follower force case, the limit loads are obtained only for negative eccentricity (i.e. point of force application displaced towards the rigid foundation). For the fixed force cases, with large upward inclination of the applied load, the limit load corresponding to the lowest mode of deformation does not exist. The limit load is larger for the case of positive eccentricity than negative eccentricity. A slight change in the angle of inclination of the applied load has a more significant effect on the limit load than a slight change in the eccentricity of the load. An increase in the superimposed uniformly distributed load on the beam increases the limit load substantially and has the effect of reducing the uplift length.

Article Outline

• References

 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.