ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
You have guest access to ScienceDirect. Find out more.
 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search
 Search tips (Opens new window)
    Clear all fields    
 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
 Abstract - selected
Purchase PDF (1718 K)

Article Toolbox
 
 
 
Related Articles in ScienceDirect
View More Related Articles
 
View Record in Scopus
 
doi:10.1016/0020-0255(93)90047-P    
How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)

Copyright © 1993 Published by Elsevier Science Inc.

A connectionist approach to diagnostic problem solving using causal networks

Purchase the full-text article



References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

James A. Reggia

Yun Peng

Stanley Tuhrim

Department of Computer Science, Institute of Advanced Computer Studies and Department of Neurology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA

Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Department of Neurology, Mount Sinai Medical School, New York, New York, USA


Received 13 September 1991; 
revised 30 April 1992. 
Available online 20 May 2003.

Abstract

In general diagnostic problem solving using causal networks, one is often interested in identifying the most plausible explanation for observed manifestations. Although a number of sequential AI search methods have been applied to this task, these methods suffer from potential combinatorial explosion. It thus seems reasonable to explore whether connectionist modeling methods can overcome this difficulty through the use of extensive explicit parallel processing. A number of studies have recently implemented diagnostic systems using connectionist models, but these are based on a distributed representation and face significant limitations that are summarized in this paper. Accordingly, we have developed a connectionist model of diagnostic inference using a local representation to address these limitations. This model controls spreading activation in a causal network that has rapidly varying connection strengths. It generates diagnostic hypotheses based on the same causal network that would be used by a traditional AI search algorithm. Experimental results are presented that demonstrate that this connectionist model can closely approximate the best diagnostic hypotheses with some causal networks, even when multiple disorders are present simultaneously.

Article Outline

• References

 
Home
Browse
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Information for Advertisers  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.