Elsevier

Icarus

Volume 47, Issue 3, September 1981, Pages 492-499
Icarus

Comet Tempel-Tuttle and the Leonid meteors

https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(81)90198-6Get rights and content

Abstract

The distribution of dust surrounding periodic comet Tempel-Tuttle has been mapped by analyzing the associated Leonid meteor shower data over the 902–1969 interval. The majority of dust ejected from the parent comet evolves to a position lagging the comet and outside the comet's orbit. The outgassing and dust ejection required to explain the parent comet's deviation from pure gravitational motion would preferentially place dust in a position leading the comet and inside the comet's orbit. Hence it appears that radiation pressure and planetary perturbations, rather than ejection processes, control the dynamic evolution of the Leonid particles. Significant Leonid meteor showers are possible roughly 2500 days before or after the parent comet reaches perihelion but only if the comet passes closer than 0.025 AU inside or 0.010 AU outside the Earth's orbit. Although the conditions in 1998–1999 are optimum for a significant Leonid meteor shower, the event is not certain because the dust particle distribution near the comet is far from uniform. As a by-product of this study, the orbit of comet Tempel-Tuttle has been redetermined for the 1366–1966 observed interval.

References (27)

  • J.C. Adams

    On the orbit of the November meteors

    Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.

    (1866)
  • U. Dall'olmo

    Meteors, meteor showers and meteorites in the middle ages from European medieval sources

    J. History Astron.

    (1978)
  • S. Imoto et al.

    Historical records of meteor showers in China, Korea, and Japan

    Smithsonian Contrib. Astrophys.

    (1958)
  • S. Kanda

    On the orbits of the comet of 1366 A.D. and of 868 A.D.

    Japan. J. Astron. Geophys.

    (1932)
  • E.I. Kazimircak-Polonskaja et al.

    Investigation of perturbed motion of the Leonid meteor stream

  • G. Kirch

    Observatio cometae A. 1699 in suprema puppi navis Argus

    Miscellanea Berolinensia

    (1737)
  • L. Kresák

    Sources of interplanetary dust

  • U.J.J. Le Verrier

    Sur les étoiles filantes du 13 Novembre et du 10 Août

    Comptes Rendus

    (1867)
  • A.C.B. Lovell

    Meteor Astronomy

    (1954)
  • B.A. McIntosh

    Origin and evolution of recent Leonid meteor showers

  • B.A. McIntosh et al.

    The Leonids by radar, 1957 to 1968

    Meteoritics

    (1970)
  • B.G. Marsden et al.

    Comets and nongravitational forces. V

    Astron. J.

    (1973)
  • P.M. Millman

    Meteor news

    Roy. Astron. Soc. Canada

    (1970)
  • Cited by (67)

    • When comets get old: A synthesis of comet and meteor observations of the low activity comet 209P/LINEAR

      2016, Icarus
      Citation Excerpt :

      In particular, we note four of these comets – namely 209P/LINEAR, 252P/LINEAR, 289P/2003 WY25 (Blanpain) and 300P/2005 JQ5 (Catalina) – can produce meteor showers currently observable at Earth. Meteor showers are caused by cometary dusts ejected in past orbits of the parent, therefore meteor observations have the potential of enhancing our understanding of the physical history of the parent, as demonstrated in the investigation of the present and past activity of 55P/Tempel-Tuttle (e.g. Yeomans, 1981; Brown, 1999) and a couple of potential dormant comets (e.g. Babadzhanov et al., 2012; Kokhirova and Babadzhanov, 2015). We then model the May 25 Gemini image.

    • Observations of the 2001 Leonid meteor shower using VHF meteor radar

      2008, Icarus
      Citation Excerpt :

      It has been noted, however, that high meteor fluxes at the peak of the Leonid shower are composed of material deposed in the last few revolutions of the comet, and that the years where the Leonid shower appears stronger coincide with the return of the comet to perihelion (Brown et al., 1997, 1998), although this in not always the case. Yeomans (1981) recognizes that the mechanisms that control the dynamic evolution of the Leonids particles are radiation pressure and planetary perturbations, rather than just the ejection processes. This generates a dust trail which has a non-uniform particle distribution, and raises the difficulty of modeling the comet's orbit and the distribution of the particles.

    • A synthetical index of the potential threats about intense activities of meteors

      2006, New Astronomy
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, a tremendous amount of meteoroids might be encountered in a short time. In Leonids 1966, a ZHR of about 150,000 meteors was ever recorded (Yeomans, 1981; Jenniskens, 1995; McNaught and Asher, 1999; Wu, 2002). In despite of considering the new results after the Leonids 2001, Jenniskens (2002) concluded that the level should have been closer to 15,000 than 150,000, people often think that Leonids is one of the most dangerous meteor streams, even under the normal conditions (Jenniskens et al., 1998; McBride and McDonnell, 1999; Foschini, 2002).

    • Analysis of historical meteor and meteor shower records: Korea, China, and Japan

      2005, Icarus
      Citation Excerpt :

      According to Wu (2002), Leonid showers would never be seen for more than about four consecutive years. Yeomans (1981) on the other hand has suggested that significant Leonid meteor showers were maintained for roughly 2500 days. We have looked for this kind of change in meteor activity in Korean records, wishing to estimate the evolution time of identified periodic meteor showers.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Paper presented at IAU Colloquium 61, “Comets: Gases, Ices, Grains, and Plasma”, Tucson, Arizona, March 11–14, 1981.

    View full text