Elsevier

Geoderma

Volume 65, Issues 1–2, February 1995, Pages 81-92
Geoderma

Research paper
Estimating the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity from theoretical models using simple soil properties

https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(95)92543-XGet rights and content

Abstract

The knowledge of the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity is one of the prerequisites to describe water flow and solute transport in soils. In this paper we examined the quality of 11 different theoretical models to predict the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity for a wide variety of soils. The hydraulic conductivity models were fitted to 44 measured curves using a quasi Newton parameter estimation method minimizing an ordinary least squared objective function. The optimized parameter set for the best model having the lowest overal mean squared error was related to basic soil properties such as texture, organic carbon, bulk density and the measured saturated hydraulic conductivity. The model evaluation showed that theoretical models can only describe the measured data succesfully when the tortuosity and the pore size interaction term are allowed to vary across different soils. Models with completely fixed parameters obtained from literature were not able to describe the measured data. The generalized theoretical models as described by Mualem and Dagan were equally flexible. The Mualem model was choosen to derive estimation or pedotransfer functions between the tortuosity (b), the pore size interaction term (x) and soil properties. Different regression equations have been derived depending upon the available information. Soil texture alone is not sufficient to provide reasonable estimates, resulting in a coefficient of determination of 30% for x and 11% for b. The best estimates where obtained when using information from the moisture retention characteristic and the measured saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat). Introducing Ksat in the regression equation improved the coefficient of determination with 7% for x and 56% for b.

References (22)

  • L.M. Arya et al.

    A field study of soil water depletion patterns in presence of growing soy bean roots. I. determination of hydraulic properties of the soil

    Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.

    (1975)
  • J. Bouma et al.

    Assesing the suitability of soils with macropores for subsurface liquid disposal

    J. Environ. Qual.

    (1983)
  • W. Brutsaert

    Probability laws for pore size distributions

    Soil Sci.

    (1966)
  • N.T. Burdine

    Relative permeability calculations from size distribution data

    Trans. AIME

    (1953)
  • E.C. Childs et al.

    The permeability of porous materials

  • J.I. Gates et al.

    Relative permeabilities of California cres by the capillary-pressure method. Drilling and production practice

    Am. Petrol. Inst.

    (1950)
  • R.J. Kunze et al.

    Factors important in the calculation of hydraulic conductivity

  • T.J. Marshall

    A relation between permeability and size distribution of pores

    J. Soil Sci.

    (1958)
  • R.J. Millington et al.

    Permeability of porous solids

    Faraday Soc.

    (1961)
  • Y. Mualem

    A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media

    Water Resour. Res.

    (1976)
  • Y. Mualem et al.

    Hydraulic conductivity of soils: unified approach to the statistical models

    Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.

    (1978)
  • Cited by (77)

    • Utilizing Splintex 2.0 for estimating the soil hydraulic conductivity curve measured with instantaneous profile method

      2020, Soil and Tillage Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The predictors sand, silt, clay, and ρb were significantly correlated with θs and m estimated by Splintex 2.0 and with the measured Ks showing the expected physical behavior. Overall, the cross-correlation among VGM parameters and their predictors is complex, as also reported since Vereecken (1995) and Schaap and Leij (2000) and currently declared by Ottoni et al. (2019) and Zhang and Schaap (2019). In this study, the performance of Splintex 2.0 for estimating VGM parameters that compose the soil hydraulic conductivity curve (SHCC), including the saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks), for four texture groups and a range of bulk densities was evaluated.

    • Improving unsaturated hydraulic conductivity estimation in soils via percolation theory

      2017, Geoderma
      Citation Excerpt :

      Accurate estimate of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity K(Sw) is still challenging and of great interest, particularly in two-phase flow and contaminant transport modeling in soils. Various models based on data mining techniques (e.g., Wösten and van Genuchten, 1988; Vereecken et al., 1990; Vereecken, 1995; Schaap and Leij, 1998; Weynants et al., 2009), bundle of straight capillary tubes (e.g., Purcell, 1949; Childs and Collis-George, 1950; Burdine, 1953; Mualem, 1976; Kosugi, 1999), bundle of tortuous capillary tubes (e.g., Yu et al., 2003; Liu et al., 2007; Xu et al., 2013), critical path analysis (e.g., Hunt, 2001; Hunt and Gee, 2002a,b; Hunt, 2004a; Ghanbarian-Alavijeh and Hunt, 2012; Hunt et al., 2013), effective-medium approximations (e.g., Levine and Cuthiell, 1986; Kanellopoulos and Petrou, 1988; Ghanbarian et al., 2016b), percolation theory (e.g., Larson et al., 1981; Heiba et al., 1992; Blunt et al., 1992), pore network models (e.g., Jerauld and Salter, 1990; Blunt and King, 1991; Bakke and Øren, 1997; Raoof and Hassanizadeh, 2012) and lattice-Boltzmann methods (e.g., Hazlett et al., 1998; Ramstad et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2016) have been developed to estimate K(Sw) from other porous medium characteristics, such as water retention curve (also known as capillary pressure curve), particle-size distribution, porosity, saturated hydraulic conductivity Ks, two- and three-dimensional images, etc. The literature on unsaturated hydraulic conductivity modeling and estimation is vast and extensive.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text