Ejecta from large craters on the Moon: Comments on the geometric model of McGetchin et al.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-821X(74)90114-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Amendments to a quantitative scheme developed by T.R. McGetchin et al. (1973) for predicting the distribution of ejecta from lunar basins yield substantially thicker estimates of ejecta, deposited at the basin rim-crest and at varying ranges byond, than does the original model. Estimates of the total volume of material ejected from a basin, illustrated by Imbrium, also are much greater. Because many uncertainties affect any geometric model developed primarily from terrestrial analogs of lunar craters, predictions of ejecta thickness and volume on the Moon may range within at least an order of magnitude. These problems are exemplified by the variability ofT, thickness of ejecta at the rim-crest of terrestrial experimental craters. The proportion ofT to crater rim-height depends critically upon scaled depth-of-burst and whether the explosive is nuclear or chemical.

References (15)

  • McGetchinT.R. et al.

    Radial thickness variation in impact crater ejecta: implications for lunar basin deposits

    Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.

    (1973)
  • ShoemakerE.M.

    Throw-out calculations for the lunar crater Copernicus

  • PikeR.J.

    Schroeter's rule and the modification of lunar crater impact morphology

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (1967)
  • PikeR.J.

    Geometric similitude of lunar and terrestrial craters

  • CarlsonR.H. et al.

    Distribution of ejecta from cratering explosions in soils

    J. Geophys. Res.

    (1965)
  • ShoemakerE.M.

    Penetration mechanics of high velocity meteorites, illustrated by Meteor Crater, Arizona

  • RoddyD.J.

    Project LN303, Geologic studies of the Middle Gust and Mixed Company craters

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (79)

  • 3D-simulation of lunar megaregolith evolution: Quantitative constraints on spatial variation and size of fragment

    2022, Earth and Planetary Science Letters
    Citation Excerpt :

    The petrophysical properties of megaregolith, such as porosity and related strength, significantly differ from pristine rocks resulting in variations in the relationship between impact crater size and impact energy (Marchi et al., 2011). The thickness of the megaregolith layer was investigated based on ejecta estimates (Housen et al., 1983; McGetchin et al., 1973; Petro and Pieters, 2008; Pike, 1974), or on radar and optical data (Blanchette-Guertin et al., 2012; Thompson et al., 2009). The estimates were, however, highly diverse ranging from a few hundreds of meters up to tens of kilometers.

  • On the provenance of the Chang'E-5 lunar samples

    2022, Earth and Planetary Science Letters
  • Mass Movements Related with Impact Craters

    2022, Treatise on Geomorphology
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text