Ejecta from large craters on the Moon: Comments on the geometric model of McGetchin et al.
References (15)
- et al.
Radial thickness variation in impact crater ejecta: implications for lunar basin deposits
Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.
(1973) Throw-out calculations for the lunar crater Copernicus
Schroeter's rule and the modification of lunar crater impact morphology
J. Geophys. Res.
(1967)Geometric similitude of lunar and terrestrial craters
- et al.
Distribution of ejecta from cratering explosions in soils
J. Geophys. Res.
(1965) Penetration mechanics of high velocity meteorites, illustrated by Meteor Crater, Arizona
Project LN303, Geologic studies of the Middle Gust and Mixed Company craters
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (79)
3D-simulation of lunar megaregolith evolution: Quantitative constraints on spatial variation and size of fragment
2022, Earth and Planetary Science LettersCitation Excerpt :The petrophysical properties of megaregolith, such as porosity and related strength, significantly differ from pristine rocks resulting in variations in the relationship between impact crater size and impact energy (Marchi et al., 2011). The thickness of the megaregolith layer was investigated based on ejecta estimates (Housen et al., 1983; McGetchin et al., 1973; Petro and Pieters, 2008; Pike, 1974), or on radar and optical data (Blanchette-Guertin et al., 2012; Thompson et al., 2009). The estimates were, however, highly diverse ranging from a few hundreds of meters up to tens of kilometers.
On the provenance of the Chang'E-5 lunar samples
2022, Earth and Planetary Science LettersMass Movements Related with Impact Craters
2022, Treatise on Geomorphology
Copyright © 1974 Published by Elsevier B.V.