Measurement by a flow dialysis technique of the steady-state proton-motive force in chromatophores from Rhodospirillum rubrum. Comparison with phosphorylation potential

https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2728(78)90136-6Get rights and content

Abstract

  • 1.

    1. In the light a transmembrane electrical potential of 100 mV has been estimated to occur in chromatophores from Rhodospirillum rubrum. The potential was determined by measuring the steady-state distribution of the permeant SCN across the chromatophore membrane using a flow dialysis technique. The potential was not observed in the dark, nor in the presence of antimycin. It was dissipated on the addition of carbonyl cyanide p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone. The potential was reduced by between 15 and 20 mV when ADP and Pi were added. Hydrolysis of ATP by the chromatophores generated a membrane potential of about 80 mV.

  • 2.

    2. Using a flow dialysis technique light-dependent uptake of methylamine was observed only in the presence of concentrations of SCN that were 500-fold higher than were used to measure the membrane potential. It is concluded that the pH gradient across the illuminated chromatophore membrane is insignificant except in the presence of relatively high concentrations of a permeant anion like thiocyanate. Further evidence that a negligible pH gradient was generated by the chromatophores is that addition of K+ and nigericin to illuminated chromatophores did not stimulate uptake of SCN.

  • 3.

    3. In the light the chromatophores established and maintained a phosphorylation potential of up to 14 kcal/mol. If a phosphorylation potential of this magnitude is to be poised against a proton-motive force that comprises solely a membrane potential of approx. 100 mV, then at least five protons must be translocated for each ATP synthesised via a chemiosmotic mechanism.

References (42)

  • R. Casadio et al.

    FEBS Lett.

    (1974)
  • J.B. Jackson et al.

    FEBS Lett.

    (1969)
  • J.W.T. Fiolet et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1974)
  • S. Schuldiner et al.

    FEBS Lett.

    (1974)
  • S.P. Colowick et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1969)
  • J.G. Ormerod et al.

    Arch. Biochem. Biophys.

    (1961)
  • J.C. Turner

    Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isot.

    (1969)
  • O.H. Lowry et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1951)
  • S. Papa et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1973)
  • M. Leiser et al.

    Arch. Biochem. Biophys.

    (1977)
  • M. Nishimura

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1970)
  • S. Saphon et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1975)
  • U. Pick et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1976)
  • Z. Gromet-Elhanan et al.

    Arch. Biochem. Biophys.

    (1973)
  • S.J. Ferguson et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1976)
  • Z. Gromet-Elhanan

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1972)
  • J.B. Jackson et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1975)
  • P. Gräber et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1976)
  • J. Rosing et al.

    Biochim. Biophys. Acta

    (1972)
  • U. Pick et al.

    FEBS Lett.

    (1973)
  • O.T.G. Jones
  • Cited by (48)

    • A protet-based, protonic charge transfer model of energy coupling in oxidative and photosynthetic phosphorylation

      2021, Advances in Microbial Physiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, in chromatophores of Rhodospirillum rubrum, we found a membrane potential of just 100 mV with no pH gradient (nor any effects of the K+/H+ exchanger nigericin), despite the fact that chromatophores can and do make ATP at high rates (Hitchens & Kell, 1982a, 1982b, 1983a, 1983b; Nishimura et al., 1962) and to a high extent (phosphorylation potential) (Kell, Ferguson, & John, 1978). Although at the time (Kell, Ferguson, & John, 1978) we suggested that possibly a high ➔H+/ATP ratio could account for this (and see Petronilli, Pietrobon, Zoratti, & Azzone, 1986), we now recognize (see above and Kell, 1986) that the threshold demonstrably required in ‘acid-bath’-type experiments means that such an explanation is not tenable. Many artificial cations are accumulated by mitochondria (e.g. Battogtokh et al., 2018; Brenner, 1953; Chen et al., 1982, 2019; Cottet-Rousselle, Ronot, Leverve, & Mayol, 2011; Duchen, Surin, & Jacobson, 2003; Emaus, Grunwald, & Lemasters, 1986; Fantin, Berardi, Scorrano, Korsmeyer, & Leder, 2002; Finichiu, James, Larsen, Smith, & Murphy, 2013; Fulda, Galluzzi, & Kroemer, 2010; Johnson, Walsh, & Chen, 1980; Kalyanaraman et al., 2018; Kurtoglu & Lampidis, 2009; Momcilovic et al., 2019; Murphy, 1997, 2008; Nicholls, 2018; Porteous et al., 2010; Rideout, Bustamante, & Patel, 1994; Ross et al., 2005; Šarić et al., 2017; Zielonka et al., 2017), and a common assumption is that this accumulation is driven by a chemiosmotic membrane potential, as per Eq. (6), together with implicit assumptions that such cations pass freely through any bilayer that may be present, and that the binding to it is negligible.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text