Original article
Five-year experience with the maze procedure for atrial fibrillation,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(93)90338-IGet rights and content

Abstract

Between September 25, 1987, and December 31, 1992, 75 patients (53 men, 22 women; average age, 52 years) underwent the maze procedure for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Six patients had undergone a previous cardiac operation and 28% underwent concomitant cardiac procedures in addition to the maze procedure. One patient (1.3%) died 10 days after undergoing a combined maze procedure and Morrow procedure for the management of chronic atrial fibrillation and hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Postoperative atrial pacemakers were required in 40%:26% for preoperative sick sinus syndrome and 6% for iatrogenic injury of the sinus node, and 8% had pacemakers in place preoperatively. As of December 31, 1992, 65 patients had been followed up for at least 3 months after operation (range, 3 to 63 months). The maze procedure cured atrial fibrillation, restored atrioventricular synchrony, and preserved atrial transport function in 64 of 65 patients (98%). The procedure has been curative without the need for medications in 58 of 65 patients (89%) and with the need for medications in 6 of 65 (9%), with medications failing in only 1 of the 65 patients (2%). The results support the maze procedure as the treatment of choice in patients with medically refractory symptomatic atrial fibrillation.

References (24)

  • JM Williams et al.

    Left atrial isolation: new technique for the treatment of supraventricular arrhythmias

    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

    (1980)
  • MM Scheinman et al.

    Catheter-induced ablation of the atrioventricular junction to control refractory supraventricular arrhythmias

    JAMA

    (1982)
  • Cited by (441)

    • Organ conformal electronics for cardiac therapeutics

      2020, Emerging Technologies for Heart Diseases: Volume 2: Treatments for Myocardial Ischemia and Arrhythmias
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Presented at the Twenty-ninth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, San Antonio, TX, Jan 25–27, 1993.

    ☆☆

    Supported by NIH grants RO1 HL32257 and RO1 HL33722.

    View full text