Scientific paper
Esophageal manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring in the diagnosis of pulmonary aspiration secondary to gastroesophageal reflux

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(92)90041-OGet rights and content

Abstract

Twenty-three consecutive patients who had persistent respiratory symptoms of unexplained etiology were evaluated to determine the presence of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and its relationship to their respiratory complaints. Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and upper esophageal sphincter (UES) pressures and the characteristics of the peristaltic waves in the proximal and distal esophagus were determined. Esophageal acid exposure 5 cm and 20 cm above the LES was measured using a pH probe with two antimony sensors. Aspiration was diagnosed when respiratory symptoms occurred during or within 3 minutes after a reflux episode, recorded at both levels of the esophagus. Based on these criteria, 12 patients were considered nonaspirators (group A), and 11 were categorized as aspirators (group B). Aspirators had: (1) lower LES pressure (6.1 ± 3.1 versus 12 ± 4.8 mm Hg, p < 0.01); (2) decreased amplitude of peristalsis in the proximal esophagus (34 ± 16 versus 59 ± 21 mm Hg, p < 0.01) and distal esophagus (46 ± 25 versus 91 ± 28 mm Hg, p < 0.01), and higher incidence of simultaneous, non peristaltic waves (30% versus 4%); and (3) lower UES pressure (44 ± 23 versus 74 ± 38 mm Hg). Impaired peristalsis in aspirators caused a higher acid exposure (11.4% ± 8.0% versus 1.0% ± 0.7% of time pH < 4, p < 0.01) and delayed clearance (5.5 ± 6.5 versus 0.7 ± 0.4 min) in the proximal esophagus. Our study shows that, in patients with respiratory symptoms of unexplained etiology, esophageal manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring will identify a subgroup of true aspirators. These patients suffer from a panesophageal motor dysfunction that affects all three barriers to aspiration: the LES, the esophageal “pump mechanism,” and the UES.

References (19)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (91)

  • Evaluation and Treatment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms

    2011, Thoracic Surgery Clinics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Some have used this technology to measure the proximal extent of reflux as a surrogate for detecting aspiration events. The first to study this was Patti and colleagues,34,35 who performed dual-probe 24-hour pH monitoring studies on patients with chronic respiratory symptoms of unknown origin with the goal of identifying aspirating patients. In this study, aspiration was defined by respiratory symptoms that occurred within 3 minutes after a reflux episode detected by both proximal and distal pH probe.

  • Gastrointestinal Monitoring Techniques

    2010, Principles and Practice of Sleep Medicine: Fifth Edition
  • Does Chronic Microaspiration Cause Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis?

    2010, American Journal of Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    The finding of gastroesophageal reflux does not imply microaspiration, and there is no consensus on a gold standard for the diagnosis of microaspiration in the pulmonary community. Respiratory symptoms are well-recognized extra-esophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux,63 and reflux extending into the proximal esophagus and cricopharyngeal region is thought to reflect a high risk for microaspiration;44,64,65 however, its sensitivity and specificity are unknown. The measurement of pepsin and bile salt in BAL may help clarify this issue.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Presented as a poster paper at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, New Orleans, Louisiana, May 20–22, 1991.

1

From the Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

View full text