American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume 168, Issue 6, Part 1, June 1993, Pages 1846-1851
Presented by invitation at the Fifty-ninth Annual Meeting of the Pacific Coast Obstetrical and Gynecological Society Ojai, California, October 11-18, 1992.
References (43)
Artificial insemination using donor semen and the issue of secrecy: the views of donors and recipient couples
Soc Sci Med
(1988)Artificial insemination
Fertil Steril
(1956)- et al.
Psychological aspects of donor insemination: evaluation and follow-up of recipient couples
Fertil Steril
(1992) - et al.
The effects of genderspecific diagnosis on men's and women's response to infertility
Fertil Steril
(1992) Infertility and bioethical issues of the new reproductive technologies
Psychiatr Clin North Am
(1989)The social and psychological consequences of secrecy in artificial insemination by donor (AID) programmes
Soc Sci Med
(1985)- et al.
Psychological factors related to donor insemination
Fertil Steril
(1991) - US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment: Artificial insemination: practice in the United States. Summary of a 1987...
Donor insemination: The psychological issues
Contemp Ob Gyn
(1981)- et al.
Psychological patterns in donor insemination couples
Can J Psychiatry
(1986)
Handling of secrecy by AID couples
Filiation and secrecy in artificial insemination with donor
Hum Reprod
(1990)
AID and secrecy
Pregnancy outcome, health of children, and family adjustment after donor insemination
Obstet Gynecol
(1990)
Therapeutic donor insemination: a review of 440 cases
Cal Med
(1959)
Psychological reactions of couples to artificial insemination with donor sperm
Int J Fertil
(1979)
An inquiry into the psychological effects on parents of artificial insemination with donor sperm
Eugenics Rev
(1967)
AID offspring: initial follow-up study of 50 couples
Med J Aust
(1982)
Role of artificial insemination the the treatment of sterility
Obstet Gynecol Surv
(1960)
Human artificial insemination-some social and legal issues
Med J Aust
(1977)
Cited by (37)
How parents whose children have been conceived with donor gametes make their disclosure decision: contexts, influences, and couple dynamics
2008, Fertility and SterilityCitation Excerpt :We found that couples are given and seek the opinions and perspectives of people outside the marital dyad, including family, friends, other DI/egg donation couples, and medical and mental health professionals. The historical disparity between disclosure advice given by mental health professionals and physicians to DI couples (24) was reflected in our data with physicians being the only professionals to support nondisclosure and mental health professionals uniformly urging disclosure. In the United States, egg donation patients typically are required to attend a one-time meeting with a mental health professional.
Sperm Donation: Implications of Canada's Assisted Human Reproduction Act 2004 for Recipients, Donors, Health Professionals, and Institutions
2006, Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology CanadaPhysiognomy, familism and consumerism: Preferences among Jewish-Israeli recipients of donor insemination
2002, Social Science and MedicineGood practice recommendations for information provision for those involved in reproductive donation
2022, Human Reproduction OpenSame-Donor-Offspring: Sharing “Origins” in Sperm Donor Conception (United Kingdom, France)
2021, Enfances, Familles, Generations
Secrecy: An unresolved issue in the practice of donor insemination
Copyright © 1993 Mosby. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.