Effect of sotalol on ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation in humans

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(93)90028-BGet rights and content

Abstract

Antiarrhythmic drugs are frequently administered to patients receiving implanted cardioverter defibrillators. Some of these drugs may decrease the efficacy of defibrillation shocks from the defibrillator. Sotalol, a drug with β-blocking and class III antiarrhythmic properties, lowers defibrillation energy requirements in experimental animals and may do so in humans. Oral sotalol 171 ± 58 mg was administered before and after device implantation in 25 patients receiving implanted defibrillators. During sotalol therapy, the lowest energy required for successful defibrillation was 5.9 ± 3.4 J (range 2–15 J). In a concurrent non-randomized comparison group of 23 patients, including 18 treated with amiodarone, the lowest successful energy was 16 ± 10 J (p <0.01). In 5 sotalol patients, ventricular fibrillation (VF) could not be induced at all (1 patient) or more than 2 or 3 times (4 patients) despite repeated 60 Hz stimulation. The induced VF had a pronounced tendency to terminate spontaneously, with the termination occurring at up to 23 seconds after the offset of 60 Hz stimulation. The cycle length of the VF was 236 ± 34 msec, significantly greater than in patients not given drug therapy (191 ± 21 msec, p <0.01). In 10 patients, but none of the controls, intracardiac electrograms during surface electrocardiograph VF were regular, monoform, and without low-amplitude diastolic activity. In addition, monophasic action potentials during apparent VF showed maintenance of distinct and normal morphology. The ventricular effective refractory period increased after sotalol (249.4 ± 19 to 278.4 ± 24 msec; p <0.03) and the maximum heart rate response to exercise was limited to 120 ± 28 beats/min. Sotalol may modify VF and may enhance defibrillation efficacy. In view of its efficacy in life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, it appears to be particularly well suited as adjunctive therapy in patients with implanted defibrillators.

References (41)

  • PR Hite et al.

    Effect of calcium channel blockers on hemodynamic responses to defibrillation

    Am Heart J

    (1989)
  • JM Herre et al.

    Long-term results of amiodarone therapy in patients with recurrent sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation

    Am J Cardiol

    (1989)
  • PJ Troup

    Implantable cardioverters and defibrillators

    Curr Probl Cardiol

    (1989)
  • FX Witkowski et al.

    Mechanism of cardiac defibrillation in open-chest dogs with unipolar DC-coupled simultaneous activation and shock potential recordings

    Circulation

    (1990)
  • P-S Chen et al.

    Mechanism of cardiac defibrillation: a different point of view

    Circulation

    (1991)
  • J Borbola et al.

    The automatic implantable cardioverter—defibrillator: clinical experience, complications, and follow-up in 25 patients

    Arch Intern Med

    (1988)
  • LH Frame et al.

    Oral loading with amiodarone increases ventricular defibrillation threshold with implanted electrodes in dogs. (Abstr.)

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1986)
  • ES Fain et al.

    Effects of encainide and its metabolites on energy requirements for defibrillation

    Circulation

    (1986)
  • W Peters et al.

    Acute effects of intravenous propafenone on the internal ventricular defibrillation energy requirements in the anesthetized dog

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (1991)
  • RN Fogoros

    Amiodarone-induced refractoriness to cardioversion

    Ann Intern Med

    (1984)
  • Cited by (76)

    • Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock prevention does not reduce mortality: A systemic review

      2012, Heart Rhythm
      Citation Excerpt :

      Many antiarrhythmic medications have been clearly shown to increase all-cause mortality,14,15 and although amiodarone appears to have a neutral effect on all-cause mortality in patients without an ICD,4 it has significant extracardiac toxicity that may be fatal.4,16,17 There is also the concern that amiodarone could increase defibrillation threshold in ICD patients,37–39 thereby reducing some of the benefit of ICD therapy in this population. Catheter ablation is associated with a variety of periprocedural complications and has a 3% procedure-related mortality rate,20,40 although there were no periprocedural deaths in the trials included in this analysis.

    • Antiarrhythmic drug therapy for new-onset ventricular arrhythmia (VT/VF) in ICD patients

      2011, Cardiac Electrophysiology Clinics
      Citation Excerpt :

      AAD drug therapy may slow the rate of ventricular arrhythmia, making it more hemodynamically tolerable and amenable to termination by ATP before a shock is delivered. Certain AAD (sotalol and dofetilide) also reduce the defibrillation threshold (DFT) and may help in easier termination of ventricular arrhythmia.58–61 AAD therapy may cause slowing of ventricular arrhythmia and, if the rate is slower than the programmed ICD detection rate, may result in failure to deliver therapy.

    • Testing and programming of implantable defibrillator functions at implantation

      2007, Clinical Cardiac Pacing, Defibrillation, and Resynchronization Therapy
    • Testing and programming of implantable defibrillator functions at implantation

      2006, Clinical Cardiac Pacing, Defibrillation and Resynchronization Therapy
    • Ventricular fibrillation: Basic concepts

      2004, Pediatric Clinics of North America
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This study was supported by the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario.

    1

    Dr. Dorian is supported by a Pharmaceutical Manufacturers' Association of Canada Health Research Foundation/Medical Research Council of Canada Career Investigator Award.

    View full text