Prevalence and clinical correlates of non-Wenckebach, narrow-complex second-degree atrioventricular block detected by ambulatory ECG

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(88)90526-1Get rights and content

Abstract

Among 113 patients with transient, narrow-complex second-degree atrioventricular (AV) block detected by ambulatory ECG, there were 20 with non-Wenckebach behavior. Based on the presence or absence of PR interval shortening after single blocked complexes, patients with narrow-complex non-Wenckebach patterns could be separated into a pseudo-Mobitz II group of 16 patients (≥20 msec of PR shortening after the blocked complex) and a classic Mobitz II group of four patients (constant PR interval). These groups had additional distinct ECG and clinical features. Patients with the pseudo-Mobitz II pattern had a 44% prevalence of associated Wenckebach block during the same ambulatory recording, whereas Wenckebach behavior did not occur in patients with classic Mobitz II block. Pseudo-Mobitz II block occurred at significantly longer cycle lengths (876 vs 585 msec) and with significantly longer PR intervals (225 vs 165 msec) preceding the blocked complex than did classic Mobitz II block. Syncope was the presenting symptom in 38% of patients with pseudo-Mobitz II block and in all patients with classic Mobitz II block. Patients with pseudo-Mobitz II block had a 56% prevalence of associated coronary disease and a 44% prevalence of congestive heart failure; the mortality rate was 38% in this group over 4 years of follow-up, but in all instances death was due to associated disease rather than to conduction itself. In contrast, patients with classic Mobitz II block had hypertensive or valvular disease but no evidence of coronary disease or congestive failure; all are alive with pacemakers after 3 years of follow-up. These observations suggest that the behavior of the PR interval after the blocked complex can identify clinically distinct groups of patients with transient, non-Wenckebach narrow-complex second-degree AV block.

References (29)

  • W Mobitz

    Uber die unvollstandige Storung der Erregungsuberleitung zwischen Vorhof aund Kammer des menschlichen Herzens

    Z Gesamte Exp Med

    (1924)
  • HS Friedman et al.

    An analysis of Wenckebach periodicity

    J Electrocardiol

    (1975)
  • N El-Sheriff et al.

    Atypical Wenckebach periodicity simulating Mobitz II AV block

    Br Heart J

    (1978)
  • OS Narula

    Wenckebach type I and type II atrioventricular block (revisited)

    Cardiovasc Clin

    (1974)
  • Cited by (22)

    • Fortuitous Identification of Fluctuating AV Block: A Case Report

      2019, Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Vagally mediated AVB must be differentiated from paroxysmal, bradycardia-dependent AVB, because bradycardia-dependent AVB may progress to persistent AVB and require pacemaker placement (6,7). Depression of both sinus and AV node conduction must be present to diagnose vagally mediated AVB, and in our case, three ECG characteristics are demonstrative: 1) An irregularly and subtly lengthened (by 40 ms) P-P interval with delayed Ps that are occasionally synchronous with junctional escape complexes (Figures 2 and 3); 2) heterogeneous presentation of AVB including first degree (Figure 1), second degree Type 1 (Figure 2), 2:1 (Figures 2 and 3), and third degree (Figure 3); and 3) resumption of AV conduction upon sinus acceleration (shortened P-P interval) with significant PR prolongation (Figure 1) (5,6,8). In comparison, bradycardia-dependent AVB will typically demonstrate unchanged P-P intervals, constant PR intervals, additional conduction abnormalities such as bifascicular or bundle branch block, and initiation by premature complexes or tachycardia—all features that are absent from the ECGs in our case (7,9).

    • Syncope and paroxysmal atrioventricular block

      2017, Journal of Arrhythmia
      Citation Excerpt :

      Differential diagnosis may be difficult in cases with slight increases in PP intervals, which is consistent with sinus arrhythmia. According to some authors [19,20], an increase in this interval of only 40 ms suggests that the block is of vagal origin. This value of 40 ms is arbitrary, and a much more evident slowing of the sinus rate should probably be documented [14].

    • Atrioventricular Conduction System Disease

      2016, Clinical Cardiac Pacing, Defibrillation and Resynchronization Therapy
    • Pacing for Atrioventricular Conduction System Disease

      2011, Clinical Cardiac Pacing, Defibrillation and Resynchronization Therapy
    • Pacing for Atrioventricular Conduction System Disease

      2007, Clinical Cardiac Pacing, Defibrillation, and Resynchronization Therapy
    • Pacing for atrioventricular conduction system disease

      2006, Clinical Cardiac Pacing, Defibrillation and Resynchronization Therapy
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text