Elsevier

Gynecologic Oncology

Volume 108, Issue 1, January 2008, Pages 166-172
Gynecologic Oncology

Oncolytic adenovirus Ad5/3-Δ24 and chemotherapy for treatment of orthotopic ovarian cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.09.013Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective.

Oncolytic adenoviruses capable of replication selectively in tumor cells are an appealing approach for the treatment of neoplastic diseases refractory to conventional therapies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of dose and scheduling of a tropism-modified, adenovirus serotype 3 receptor-targeted, Rb/p16 pathway-selective replication-competent adenovirus, Ad5/3-Δ24, against human ovarian adenocarcinoma. As oncolytic viruses and chemotherapy can have synergistic interactions, the antitumor efficacy of Ad5/3-Δ24 was also studied in combination with epirubicin and gemcitabine, common second-line treatment options for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

Methods.

Orthotopic murine models of peritoneally disseminated ovarian cancer were utilized to compare survival of mice treated with either a single viral dose or weekly delivery. The lowest effective dose of intraperitoneal Ad5/3-Δ24 was determined. Combinations of Ad5/3-Δ24 and gemcitabine or epirubicin were studied in vitro as well as in vivo.

Results.

Treatment outcome after administration of a single dose of Ad5/3-Δ24 was as effective as delivery of several weekly doses. Our results also demonstrate that a single intraperitoneal injection of 100 viral particles significantly increased the survival of mice compared to untreated animals. Further, combining Ad5/3-Δ24 with either gemcitabine or epirubicin resulted in greater therapeutic benefit than either agent alone.

Conclusion.

These preclinical data suggest that Ad5/3-Δ24 represents a promising treatment strategy for advanced ovarian cancer as a single agent or in combination with chemotherapy.

Introduction

Despite improvements in the treatment of ovarian carcinoma in the last three decades, it remains the leading cause of death from gynecological malignancies in developed countries [1]. Median survival has improved due to multi-modality treatments often including a combination of primary cytoreductive surgery with platinum and taxane compounds. Nonetheless, early diagnosis continues to be challenging, and about 70% of patients present with disseminated disease for which the 5-year survival rate is approximately 30%. Therefore, novel treatment approaches such as targeted therapies are needed [2], [3]. Ovarian cancer spreads preferentially throughout the peritoneal cavity (stage III) and, since the peritoneal cavity is easily accessible and offers a degree of compartmentalization, these patients represent an attractive target for regional therapy. Of note, there is growing evidence that patients with microscopic residual disease might benefit from intraperitoneal (i.p.) treatment [4].

Oncolytic adenoviruses represent an attractive modality for cancers refractory to conventional therapies [5], [6], [7]. Such viruses are modified to take advantage of tumor-specific alterations that allow viral replication preferentially in cancer cells. Replication causes oncolytic death of the cell, resulting in release of viral progeny to surrounding cells. Amplification of the virus leads to more efficient intratumoral penetration and spread within solid tumor masses when compared to replication-deficient adenovirus vectors, which are traditionally used in gene therapy approaches. One strategy to limit replication of oncolytic adenoviruses to tumor tissues is to engineer specific deletions into the viral genome. These deletions abrogate replication in normal cells but can be transcomplemented by tumor-specific factors. Ad5-Δ24 (a.k.a. dl922–947) carries a 24-bp deletion in the constant region 2 domain of the adenoviral E1A gene [8], [9]. Thus, the E1A protein is unable to bind the retinoblastoma (Rb) tumor suppressor protein for release of E2F and subsequent effective viral replication in non-cycling normal cells. Therefore, the virus replicates selectively in cells deficient in the Rb/p16 pathway, including most if not all cancer cells including ovarian cancer cells [10], [11]. Tumor specificity of these adenoviral mutants has been previously demonstrated [8], [9].

The efficacy of oncolytic adenoviruses can be compromised if they cannot enter target cells effectively [12]. Most adenoviral gene therapy strategies are based on serotype 5 (Ad5), which binds to the coxsackie-adenovirus receptor (CAR). Unfortunately, expression of CAR is frequently down-regulated in many types of advanced cancers including ovarian cancer [6], and may be a general phenomenon related to carcinogenesis. However, lack of CAR can be circumvented by substituting the knob domain of Ad5 with the corresponding domain of serotype 3 (Ad3). Utilization of such 5/3 fiber chimeras allows virus binding and entry through the Ad3 receptor, which is expressed to high degree on ovarian cancer cells [13]. The preclinical safety and normal tissue biodistribution of this approach seems to be comparable to wild type Ad5 virus [14].

Ad5/3-Δ24 is an Rb binding deleted oncolytic adenovirus retargeted to the Ad3 receptor. It has been previously shown that this agent delivers a powerful antitumor effect to ovarian cancer cells in vitro, to clinical ovarian cancer specimens, and in orthotopic models of ovarian cancer [15], [16]. However, when combined with gemcitabine for intraperitoneal treatment of SKOV3.ip1 carcinomatosis, certain schedules resulted in liver toxicity, while giving virus 24 h after gemcitabine resulted in dramatically enhanced survival [17]. Therefore, we sought to investigate if these were model or chemotherapy agent-specific findings. Also, for optimizing protocols for upcoming clinical trials, it is of interest if weekly administration is superior over a single dose. Each ovarian cancer cell infected in vitro with Ad5/3-Δ24 rapidly produces thousands of new virions. Therefore, we performed in vivo dose de-escalation to test if virus amplification would translate into efficacy with very small doses, which might be promising with regard to clinical trials with patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Section snippets

Cells, viruses and chemotherapeutic agents

Human ovarian adenocarcinoma cell lines SKOV3.ip1 and Hey were provided by Dr. Janet Price and Dr. Judy Wolf (both from M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX). Human E1-transformed embryonal kidney cell line 293 was obtained from Microbix (Toronto, Canada) while human lung adenocarcinoma kidney cell line A549 was purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). All cell lines were cultured in the recommended growth media with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and maintained in a

Comparison of single and weekly delivery of Ad5/3-Δ24

Treatment with a single Ad5/3-Δ24 injection was compared to multiple injections in orthotopic murine models of ovarian cancer. Peritoneally disseminated carcinomatosis was allowed to develop, and Ad5/3-Δ24 was given i.p. either as a single or a weekly dose of 1 × 108 VP. Both treatment schedules resulted in significantly improved survival compared to untreated mice (p < 0.001) in both Hey and SKOV3.ip1 in vivo models (Fig. 1). However, administration of a single viral dose did not differ

Discussion

Due to theoretical safety concerns, most gene therapy strategies in recent decades have been based on viruses that are unable to proliferate in infected cells. Although replication-deficient viruses expressing therapeutic transgenes have provided high in vitro and in vivo preclinical efficacy and good clinical safety data, trials have demonstrated that the utility of these agents may be limited when faced with advanced and bulky disease [19]. Nevertheless, even early generation

Acknowledgments

Supported by Helsinki Biomedical Graduate School, University of Helsinki, EU FP6 THERADPOX and APOTHERAPY, HUCH Research Funds (EVO), Sigrid Juselius Foundation, Academy of Finland, Emil Aaltonen Foundation, Finnish Cancer Society, Biomedicum Helsinki Foundation, Finnish Cultural Foundation, Research Foundation for Virus Diseases and Schering Research Foundation (unrestricted). AH is K. Albin Johansson Research Professor of the Finnish Cancer Institute.

References (48)

  • D.K. Armstrong et al.

    Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2006)
  • D. Kirn et al.

    Replication-selective virotherapy for cancer: biological principles, risk management and future directions

    Nat Med

    (2001)
  • G.J. Bauerschmitz et al.

    Adenoviral gene therapy for cancer: from vectors to targeted and replication competent agents (review)

    Int J Oncol

    (2002)
  • A. Kanerva et al.

    Adenoviruses for treatment of cancer

    Ann Med

    (2005)
  • J. Fueyo et al.

    A mutant oncolytic adenovirus targeting the Rb pathway produces anti-glioma effect in vivo

    Oncogene

    (2000)
  • C. Heise et al.

    An adenovirus E1A mutant that demonstrates potent and selective systemic anti-tumoral efficacy

    Nat Med

    (2000)
  • C.J. Sherr

    Cancer cell cycles

    Science

    (1996)
  • G. D'Andrilli et al.

    Cell cycle genes in ovarian cancer: steps toward earlier diagnosis and novel therapies

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2004)
  • J.T. Douglas et al.

    Efficient oncolysis by a replicating adenovirus (ad) in vivo is critically dependent on tumor expression of primary ad receptors

    Cancer Res

    (2001)
  • A. Kanerva et al.

    Targeting adenovirus to the serotype 3 receptor increases gene transfer efficiency to ovarian cancer cells

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2002)
  • J.T. Lam et al.

    Inter-patient variation in efficacy of five oncolytic adenovirus candidates for ovarian cancer therapy

    J Gene Med

    (2004)
  • M. Raki et al.

    Combination of gemcitabine and Ad5/3-Δ24, a tropism modified conditionally replicating adenovirus, for the treatment of ovarian cancer

    Gene Ther

    (2005)
  • A.M. Puumalainen et al.

    Beta-galactosidase gene transfer to human malignant glioma in vivo using replication-deficient retroviruses and adenoviruses

    Hum Gene Ther

    (1998)
  • Z. Peng

    Current status of gendicine in China: recombinant human Ad-p53 agent for treatment of cancers

    Hum Gene Ther

    (2005)
  • Cited by (38)

    • A phase i clinical trial of Ad5/3-Δ24, a novel serotype-chimeric, infectivity-enhanced, conditionally-replicative adenovirus (CRAd), in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer

      2013, Gynecologic Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Efforts are underway to incorporate novel non-invasive imaging capacity into Ad5/3-Δ24. Other preclinical studies have demonstrated the potential synergy of Ad5/3-Δ24 in combination with conventional chemotherapy and randomized phase II trials of chemotherapy with or without Ad5/3-Δ24 might also be justified [31]. Further development and investigation of these novel CRAd approaches in the context of ovarian cancer appears to be warranted.

    • Selectively Replicating Oncolytic Adenoviruses Combined with Chemotherapy, Radiotherapy, or Molecular Targeted Therapy for Treatment of Human Cancers

      2013, Gene Therapy of Cancer: Translational Approaches from Preclinical Studies to Clinical Implementation: Third Edition
    • Treatment of chemotherapy resistant ovarian cancer with a MDR1 targeted oncolytic adenovirus

      2011, Gynecologic Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      This is well below the 2 × 1012 vp daily for 5 consecutive days, without dose-limiting toxicity [45]. However, the results of previous studies [35] suggest, that due to the potent amplification of CRAd agents, even a significant dose reduction does not reduce the efficacy of the treatment. In conclusion using established tumor cell lines, purified primary ovarian cancer from pretreated patients suffering from ovarian cancer and a xenograft mouse model of chemoresistant ovarian cancer cells, the replication competent, fiber modified adenovirus vector under control of the MDR1 promoter mediated an efficient antitumor efficacy and specific cell killing in chemotherapy pretreated ovarian cancer and breast cancer cells.

    • Oncolytic virotherapy of gynecologic malignancies

      2011, Gynecologic Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      This provides a new perspective to cure preferably non-bulky/low tumor burden (residual) diseases; in immunocompetent mice, such a cure of established tumors already has been achieved [103]. With respect to the preclinical evaluation of ovarian cancer treatment, different CRAds have been combined with cisplatin, epirubicin, or gemcitabine, all resulting in greater therapeutic benefit than the OV or either agent alone [122–125]. The combination of CRAds with cisplatin also induced greater antitumor effect in a human cervical cancer xenograft model [124].

    • Adenoviral E4orf3 and E4orf6 proteins, but not E1B55K, increase killing of cancer cells by radiotherapy in vivo

      2010, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
      Citation Excerpt :

      This might allow reduction of the radiation dose for reduction of harmful side effects. Further increases in efficacy could be realized by combining the approach with prodrug-converting enzymes, such as cytosine deaminase (40, 41), or by modifying the adenoviral vehicle to improve delivery (18, 42–46). As an alternative to viral delivery, E4orf3 or E4orf6 could be injected in plasmid form or produced in a recombinant manner and delivered within, for example, liposomal complexes to tumors.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text