An in vitro approach to assess the toxicity of certain food contaminants: Methylmercury and polychlorinated biphenyls
Introduction
Among the several thousand commercial chemicals, less than 10% have been evaluated for neurotoxicity (Landrigan, 1994). Yet, environmental neurotoxicants may contribute to the etiology of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinson's disease (Wright and Keller-Byrne, 2005), and to neurodevelopmental disorders, such as learning disabilities, autism or attention deficit disorder (Grandjean and Landrigan, 2006). Guidelines for neurotoxicity and developmental neurotoxicity testing have been developed, that require cumbersome protocols prescribed for standard tests in animals. Economical and time considerations, as well as ethical considerations for reducing the number of animals, have in recent years argued for the need to develop alternative in vitro methodologies to test for potential neurotoxicity (Costa, 1998, Harry et al., 1998, Gartlon et al., 2006). No in vitro neurotoxicity test has been fully validated so far, and regulatory agencies accept only in vivo animal data to predict potential neurotoxic effects in humans. Yet, in addition to their established role to investigate mechanisms of neurotoxicity, in vitro systems may be useful to screen and prioritize compounds, and to provide initial information useful to guide further in vitro and in vivo studies (Costa, 1998, Harry et al., 1998, Gartlon et al., 2006).
The present study explores the possible development of a series of in vitro screening assays by focussing on three known neurotoxicants, methylmercury (MeHg) and two polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). MeHg is a ubiquitous environmental pollutant, responsible in the past for large outbreaks of developmental neurotoxicity (Harada, 1995, Pierce et al., 1972). Current exposure occurs primarily through the consumption of contaminated fish, and epidemiological, animal, and in vitro studies have clearly demonstrated that MeHg is a developmental neurotoxicant (Grandjean et al., 1997, Castoldi et al., 2001, Clarkson and Magos, 2006). PCBs are a class of widespread environmental contaminants, also present in food such as meat, dairy products and fish (Carpenter, 2006). Among the 209 PCB congeners, a handful has a coplanar structure that allows them to bind to, and activate the aryl hydrocarbon (Ah) receptor, similarly to dioxins. Their toxicological effects thus include carcinogenicity, immunotoxicity and reproductive and developmental toxicity (Van den Berg et al., 2006, Lundqvist et al., 2006). Non-dioxin-like PCBs do not significantly interact with the Ah receptor, but cause a variety of toxic effects, including carcinogenicity and developmental neurotoxicity (Ulbrich and Stahlmann, 2004, Knerr and Schrenk, 2006).
MeHg, PCB 126 (3,3′,4,4′,5-pentachlorobiphenyl, a dioxin-like PCB), and PCB 153 (2,2′,4,4′,5,5′-hexachlorobiphenyl, a non-dioxin-like PCB) were chosen in the present study to explore simple in vitro approaches to test their known neurotoxicity. The purpose of the study was threefold: (1) To assess the ability of these compounds to cause cytotoxicity and inhibit cell proliferation in a battery of 17 different cell types. Nervous system-derived cell lines (neuronal and astroglial), primary neuronal and astroglial cells from different brain areas, and non-nervous system cell lines, were chosen for this endeavor. Among these, five cell lines were of human origin. (2) To assess possible interactions between MeHg and PCBs. This was prompted by epidemiological, animal, and in vitro evidence which suggested a possible synergistic interaction between these compounds (Grandjean et al., 2001, Bemis and Seegal, 1999, Roegge et al., 2004). (3) To determine whether neurons with genetically modified glutathione (GSH) levels may be exploited as a screening tool for further mechanistic studies. These experiments were prompted by reports indicating that PCBs and MeHg induce oxidative stress (Sarafian and Verity, 1991, Yee and Choi, 1996, Venkataraman et al., 2007, Lin and Lin, 2006). Cerebellar granule neurons prepared from Gclm (−/−) mice [that lack the modifier subunit of glutamate-cysteine ligase (GCLM), the rate limiting step in the synthesis of GSH], and from wild-type mice were used for this purpose (Giordano et al., 2006). Preliminary results of these studies have been presented (Vitalone et al., 2006, Vitalone et al., 2007).
Section snippets
Materials
Dulbecco's modified eagle medium (DMEM), minimum essential medium (MEM), Dulbecco's modified eagle medium/F12 (1:1), Hanks’ balanced salt solution (HBSS), fetal bovine serum (FBS), horse serum, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), B27, gentamicin, GlutaMax, papain and trypsin were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Ham's F12K medium and RPMI 1640 medium, were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Rockville, MD, USA). Methanol and sodium hydroxide were supplied by Fisher
Results
Cytotoxicity of MeHg, PCB 126, and PCB 153 was assessed by the MTT assay, which measures mitochondrial function, and by the Trypan blue exclusion assay, which measures the proportion of living and dead cells. Additionally, the effects of these compounds on cellular proliferation were also measured. A total of 17 cell types were utilized for these studies: seven neuronal, six astroglial, and four non-nervous system cells. Five cell lines were of human origin, while the other cell lines (except
Discussion
The first aim of this study was to investigate in vitro approaches that may be useful to develop a simple battery of tests to assess toxicity of neurotoxic compounds. For this purpose, three common food contaminants, and known neurotoxicants, were chosen: MeHg, PCB 126 and PCB 153. Utilizing three biochemical measurements of toxicity, 17 cell types were tested, to provide the following variables: human and rodent cells; cell lines and primary cells; nervous system cells (both neuronal and
Acknowledgements
This study was supported in part by grants from MIUR (PRIN 2004) and the European Union (DEVNERTOX-FOOD-CT-2003-506143). We thank Dr. Terrance J. Kavanagh for providing the Gclm-null mice.
References (70)
- et al.
Methylmercury elicits rapid inhibition of cell proliferation in the developing brain and decreases cell cycle regulator, cyclin E
Neurotoxicology
(2006) - et al.
Neurotoxicity and molecular effects of methylmercury
Brain Res. Bull.
(2001) - et al.
Effects of developmental co-exposure to methylmercury and 2,2′,4,4′,5,5′-hexachlorobiphenyl (PCB153) on cholinergic muscarinic receptors in rat brain
Neurotoxicology
(2006) - et al.
An improved method for culturing cerebellar Purkinje cells with differentiated dendrites under a mixed monolayer setting.
Brain Res. Brain Res. Protoc.
(1998) - et al.
Evaluation of a proposed in vitro test strategy using neuronal and non-neuronal cell systems for detecting neurotoxicity
Toxicol. Vitr.
(2006) - et al.
Organophosphorus insecticides chlorpyrifos and diazinon and oxidative stress in neuronal cells in a genetic model of glutathione deficiency
Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.
(2007) - et al.
Developmental neurotoxicity of industrial chemicals
Lancet
(2006) - et al.
Cognitive deficit in 7-year-old children with prenatal exposure to methylmercury
Neurotoxicol. Teratol.
(1997) - et al.
Neurobehavioral deficts associated with PCB in 7-year-old children prenatally exposed to seafood neurotoxicants
Neurotoxiol. Teratol.
(2001) - et al.
Acetylcholine as a mitogen: muscarinic receptor-mediated proliferation of rat astrocytes and human astrocytoma cells
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
(1996)