An investigation on mobility and stiffness of a 3-DOF translational parallel manipulator via screw theory

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2007.02.022Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper analyzes the mobility and stiffness of a three-prismatic-revolute-cylindrical (3-PRC) translational parallel manipulator (TPM). Firstly, the original 3-PRC TPM is converted into a non-overconstrained manipulator since there exist some practical problems for the overconstrained mechanism. By resorting to the screw theory, it is demonstrated that the conversion brings no influences to the mobility and kinematics of the manipulator. Secondly, the stiffness matrix is derived intuitively via an alternative approach based upon screw theory with the consideration of actuations and constraints, and the compliances subject to both actuators and legs are taken into account to establish the stiffness model. Furthermore, the stiffness performance of the manipulator is evaluated by utilizing the extremum stiffness values over the usable workspace, and the influences of design parameters on stiffness properties are presented, which will be helpful for the architecture design of the TPM.

Introduction

A parallel manipulator typically consists of a mobile platform that is connected to a fixed base by several limbs or legs in parallel. Generally, if carefully designed, parallel manipulators can provide several attractive advantages over their serial counterparts in terms of high stiffness, high accuracy, and low inertia [1], which enable them become challenging alternatives for wide applications such as in assembly lines, flight simulators, machine tools, ultra-precision instruments, medical devices, and so on. Recently, the progress on the development of parallel manipulators with less than six degree-of-freedom (DOF) has been accelerated because these limited-DOF parallel manipulators own several other advantages including the total cost reduction in manufacturing and operations in addition to the inherent merits of parallel mechanisms. As a result, limited-DOF parallel manipulators have been investigated and applied more and more extensively.

Among the limited-DOF manipulators, those translational parallel manipulators (TPM) possessing three spatial pure translational DOF have drawn particular interests from numerous researchers, since they satisfy the requirements of many specific applications. Various TPM architectures have been proposed in the literatures [2], [3], and the type syntheses of a 3-DOF TPM have been carried out by investigations based on the screw theory [4], [5], group theoretic approach [6], [7], and several other methods [8], [9], [10], [11].

In our previous research [12], a 3-PRC (three-prismatic-revolute-cylindrical) TPM with three P joints intersecting at a common point was presented and designed so as to eliminate all the singularities from the workspace. It should be noted that this 3-PRC TPM possessed the same mechanism with the one that was proposed in [13] with three P joints parallel to one another, and the used PRC linkage was equivalent to the PŘŘP (letters Ř denote the revolute joints with parallel axes) translational parallel kinematic chain that was enumerated by the type synthesis in [5].

As an overconstrained mechanism, the 3-PRC TPM has a very simple structure. However, in practice, the problems of variable frictions in passive joints and large reaction moment have to be considered so as to assure the mobility of the mobile platform for a 3-PRC TPM. Otherwise, the mobile platform may not move or the manipulator cannot work if there are some kinematic errors. Unfortunately, due to the unavoidable errors arising from the manufacturing tolerance and imperfect assembly, there will always exist kinematic errors. Considering this point, the original 3-PRC TPM will be converted into a non-overconstrained TPM in this paper in order to solve the movability problem by resorting to the screw theory [14], [15], [16], [17].

Additionally, since high stiffness is one of the advantages of parallel manipulators, it is necessary to investigate the stiffness issue of the 3-PRC TPM in more detail. Actually, the stiffness of a manipulator has direct impact on its position accuracy. Hence, in the early design stage, it is desired to perform the stiffness modeling and evaluation of a parallel manipulator for the precise manipulation purpose. The second objective of this paper is to accomplish the stiffness analysis of the 3-PRC TPM since there are no efforts made toward the stiffness characterization of this type of manipulator yet.

In the remainder of this paper, after a brief review of the screw and reciprocal screw systems in Section 2, and a short description of the 3-PRC TPM in Section 3, the mobility of the manipulator is analyzed in Section 4, where the overconstrained conditions of the mechanism are eliminated without any influences on its mobility and kinematics. Then in Section 5, the stiffness model is identified with the consideration of compliances subject to both actuators and legs, and the overall stiffness matrix is established. Afterwards, the stiffness assessment is carried out in Section 6 along with the derivation for the influences of design parameters on stiffness characteristics. Finally, some concluding remarks are summarized in Section 7.

Section snippets

Overview of screw and reciprocal screw systems

In screw theory, a unit (normalized) screw is defined by a pair of vectors:$^=sr×s+hs,where s is a unit vector directing along the screw axis, r denotes the position vector pointing from an arbitrary point on the screw axis to the origin of the reference frame, the vector r×s defines the moment of the screw axis with respect to the origin of the reference frame, and h represents the pitch of the screw. If the pitch equals to zero, the screw becomes:$^=sr×s.While in case of infinite pitch, the

Architecture description of the manipulator

The schematic diagram of a 3-PRC TPM is shown in Fig. 1. It consists of a mobile platform, a fixed base, and three limbs with identical kinematic structure. Each limb connects the fixed base to the mobile platform by a P (prismatic) joint, a R (revolute) joint, and a C (cylindrical) joint in sequence, where the P joint is driven by a linear actuator assembled on the fixed base. Thus, the mobile platform is attached to the base by three identical PRC linkages.

To facilitate the analysis, as shown

Mobility determination of a 3-PRC TPM

The mobility determination, i.e., the DOF identification, is the first and foremost issue in designing a parallel manipulator. The general Grübler–Kutzbach criterion is useful in mobility analysis for many parallel manipulators, however it is difficult to directly apply this criterion directly to mobility analysis of some kinds of limited-DOF parallel manipulators. For example, the number of DOF of a 3-PRC TPM given by the general Grübler–Kutzbach criterion isF=λ(n-j-1)+i=1jfi=6×(8-9-1)+12=0,

Stiffness model identification

Concerning a rigid body elastically suspended by elastic devices, if only small displacements from its unpreloaded equilibrium position are considered, the overall spatial force–deflection relation of the mechanism is linear and described by a 6×6 symmetric positive semidefinite matrix [21], i.e., the stiffness matrix. Generally, the stiffness characteristics of a parallel manipulator can be described by the 6×6 stiffness matrix, which relates the vector of compliant deformations of the

Stiffness evaluation of the TPM

For a given design of a parallel manipulator, the stiffness varies with the variation of the manipulator configurations within its workspace as well as the direction of the applied wrenches. Once the stiffness model is obtained, it is desired to predict its stiffness characteristics over the workspace in order to assess whether the design is satisfied with the stiffness requirements or even further to perform an optimal design with the stiffness considered especially in the design stage.

As far

Conclusions

In this paper, the mobility determination and stiffness analysis for a 3-DOF TPM are carried out based upon the screw theory. A 3-CRC TPM is constructed from a previously presented overconstrained 3-PRC TPM by adding a revolute joint in each limb. It has been demonstrated that the conversion does not bring any impact on the mobility and kinematics of original manipulator since the added joints are idle indeed, but it can eliminate the overconstrained conditions of a 3-PRC TPM. The stiffness

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the fund support from the research committee of University of Macau under Grant No. RG068/05-06S/07R/LYM/FST and Macao Science and Technology Development Fund under Grant No. 069/2005/A.

References (35)

  • X. Kong et al.

    Type synthesis of 3-DOF translational parallel manipulators based on screw theory

    ASME J Mech Des

    (2004)
  • J.M. Hervé et al.

    Structural synthesis of parallel robots generating spatial translation

  • M. Carricato et al.

    A family of 3-DOF translational parallel manipulators

    ASME J Mech Des

    (2003)
  • Z. Huang et al.

    Type synthesis of symmetrical lower-mobility parallel mechanisms using the constraint-synthesis method

    Int J Robot Res

    (2003)
  • D. Kim et al.

    Kinematic condition analysis of three-DOF pure translational parallel manipulators

    ASME J Mech Des

    (2003)
  • Q. Jin et al.

    Theory for topology synthesis of parallel manipulators and its application to three-dimension-translation parallel manipulators

    ASME J Mech Des

    (2004)
  • Y. Li et al.

    Kinematic analysis and design of a new 3-DOF translational parallel manipulator

    ASME J Mech Des

    (2006)
  • Cited by (76)

    • Stiffness evaluation of a novel ankle rehabilitation exoskeleton with a type-variable constraint

      2023, Mechanism and Machine Theory
      Citation Excerpt :

      To date, this method has a number of variations, differing in modelling assumptions, numerical techniques, and combined theories, which can be exploited in analytical parametric analysis of both over-constrained and non-over-constrained parallel mechanisms. Considering the convenience offered by screw theory in terms of constructing the Jacobian matrix, especially the overall Jacobian matrix of parallel mechanisms with less than 6 DOFs (i.e. limited-DOF parallel mechanisms) [33], it is also usually employed to assist with stiffness modelling [24,34–39]. This screw-based method (SBM) [40,41] provides an intuitive means of deriving the overall stiffness matrix, which is able to explicitly describe the compliances in the presence of both actuation, and constraint, forces.

    • Dimensional synthesis of a 5-DOF hybrid robot

      2020, Mechanism and Machine Theory
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text