Photocatalytic performance of nano-photocatalyst from TiO2 and Fe2O3 by mechanochemical synthesis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.05.069Get rights and content

Abstract

Nano-particles of homogeneous solid solution between TiO2 and Fe2O3 (up to 10 mol%) have been prepared by mechanochemical milling of TiO2 and yellow Fe2O3/red Fe2O3/precipitated Fe (OH)3 using a planetary ball mill. Such novel solid solution cannot be prepared by conventional co-precipitation technique. A preliminary investigation of photocatalytic activity of mixed oxide (TiO2/Fe2O3) on photo-oxidation of different organic dyes like Rhodamine B (RB), Methyl orange (MO), Thymol blue (TB) and Bromocresol green (BG) under visible light (300-W Xe lamp; λ > 420 nm) showed that TiO2 having 5 mol% of Fe2O3 (YFT1) is 3–5 times higher photoactive than that of P25 TiO2. The XRD result did not show the peaks assigned to the Fe components (for example Fe2O3, Fe3O4, FeO3, and Fe metal) on the external surface of the anatase structure in the Fe2O3/TiO2 attained through mechanochemical treatment. This meant that Fe components were well incorporated into the TiO2 anatase structure. The average crystallite size and particle size of YFT1 were found to be 12 nm and 30 ± 5 nm respectively measured from XRD and TEM conforming to nanodimensions. Together with the Fe component, they absorbed wavelength of above 387 nm. The band slightly shifted to the right without tail broadness, which was the UV absorption of Fe oxide in the Fe2O3/TiO2 particle attained through mechanochemical method. This meant that Fe components were well inserted into the framework of the TiO2 anatase structure. EPR and magnetic susceptibility show that Fe3+ is in low spin state corresponding to μB = 1.8 BM. The temperature variation of μB shows that Fe3+ is well separated from each other and does not have any antiferromagnetic or ferromagnetic interaction. The evidence of Fe3+ in TiO2/Fe2O3 alloy is also proved by a new method that is redox titration which is again support by the XPS spectrum.

Graphical abstract

Nano-particles of homogeneous solution between TiO2 and Fe2O3 (up to 5 mol%) have been prepared by mechanochemical milling. The results show that the alloy of TiO2 with 5 mol% of Fe2O3 (YFT1) exhibit photocatalytic activity 3–5 times higher than that of P25 TiO2 for oxidation of various dyes (RB, MO, TB and BG) under visible light irradiation. The average particle size and crystallite size of YFT1 were found to be 30 ± 5 nm and 12 nm measured from TEM and XRD. Optical adsorption edge is found to be 2.26 eV.

Tentative schematic diagram of reaction mechanism of YFT/RFT photocatalysts under visible light irradiation.

Highlights

► Synthesis of nano-sized homogeneous solid solution between Fe2O3 and TiO2 with high photocatalytic activity for oxidative degradation of different dyes was successfully obtained through mechanochemical synthesis. XRD data shows the formation of solid solution having anatase structure with no free Fe2O3 up to 5 mol% of Fe2O3. Fe2O3/TiO2 catalyst have crystallite size about 12–13 nm measured from XRD and particle size about 30 ± 5 nm measured from TEM. FT-IR of all Fe2O3/TiO2 prepared catalysts is similar to pure TiO2. The maximum solubility of Fe2O3 in TiO2 is 5 mol% of Fe2O3 irrespective of source and this composition has highest photocatalytic activity that is 3–5 times higher than P25 TiO2 for the oxidation of different dyes. We also observed that the rate of degradation of Rhodamine B is faster among all the four dyes under prepared catalyst and visible light.

Introduction

Photocatalytic oxidation of organic compound by wide band gap semiconductor studies is an important area of investigation. In this regard studies with TiO2 and modified TiO2 are area of intense investigation [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10].

The photocatalytic property of a multicomponent system is strongly influenced by the composition and the preparation procedure. In recent years, the application of heterogeneous photocatalysis on the removal of contaminants in air and wastewater has fetched some interest [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. Due to the high photocatalytic activity and stability of titanium dioxide, it is generally used as a photocatalyst for the removal of organic pollutants from water or air [16], [17], [18], [19], [20].

However, TiO2 follows a relatively high electron–hole recombination rate, which is detrimental to its photoactivity. The doping of TiO2 with transition metal ions like Ni(II) [21], Cu(II) [22], Nb(V) [23], Cr(III) [24], [25], Fe(III) [26], [27], [28], [29], and metal molybdates [13] were reported to improve the photocatalytic properties with enhanced absorption of visible/ultraviolet light. Binary metal oxides such as TiO2/WO3, TiO2/MoO3, TiO2/SiO2 and TiO2/ZrO2 have been widely studied for their unique chemical, physical and photocatalytic properties [30], [31], [32], [33]. Studies with a Fe2O3/SrTiO3 mixed oxide photocatalyst have shown improved photocatalytic activity for photo-oxidizing methanol under visible light irradiation [34]. Adel Ali Ismail has prepared the ternary heterogeneous mixed oxides i.e. Y2O3/Fe2O3/TiO2 nanoparticles [35], which showed better photooxidation for EDTA than pure TiO2. Recently, Fe2O3/TiO2 heterogeneous mixed oxides [36], [37], [38], [39] have shown better photocatalytic activity than pure TiO2 for oxidation of different organic compounds such as methylene blue, chloroform and formaldehyde but it is inferior to Degussa P 25. In this study a homogeneous solution between Fe2O3 and TiO2 has been made by high energy mechanical milling using various source of Fe3+ which shows high photochemical activity and it is more active than Degussa P 25 in visible light for oxidative degradation of various dyes. It is observed that the photocatalytic activity of Fe–Ti oxides alloy largely depends on iron content, preparative condition and sintering temperature having optical adsorption edge around 2.2 eV, which facilitates a strong absorption of visible light. The Fe2O3/TiO2 alloys in different mole ratio were prepared by mechanical milling method (using a ball mill) and their photocatalytic activities were evaluated by the photooxidations of different dyes like Rhodamine B (RB), Methyl orange (MO), Thymol blue (TB) and Bromocresol green (BG) under visible light (300-W Xe lamp; λ > 420 nm) irradiation. The alloy of Fe2O3 (5 mol%) with TiO2 (anatase) is a better photoactive material compared to Degussa P25 TiO2 and other compositions of Fe2O3/TiO2.

Section snippets

Synthesis of Fe2O3/TiO2 photocatalysts

A stoichiometric mixture of TiO2 (Aldrich, 99.99%) and yellow/red Fe2O3 (5, 7 and 10 mol%) (99.9%, Tata-Pigment, India) was prepared by mechanical grinding in a planetary ball mill using small amount of water. This mechanical milling was allowed for 4 h for complete mixing of the oxides forming a solid solution. The milling was performed in Fritsch Pulverisette No. 6 planetary ball mill, using a rotational speed of 250 rpm at a constant rotation direction and a ball to powder weight ratio of 10:1.

XRD analysis

Fig. 1 shows the XRD patterns of TiO2, YFT1, YFT2, YFT3, YFT4, RFT1, RFT2, YF and RF (abbreviation presented in Table 1) mixed oxides nanopowders after heat treatment at 100 °C for 15 h in air atmosphere. It has been observed that the phases prepared at different molar ratios of mixed oxides TiO2 and Fe2O3 (YFT1, YFT2, YFT4, RFT1 and RFT2) have anatase phase up to 5 mol% of Fe2O3 (as per JCPDS no. 84-1285), and YF, RF are hexagonal phases (as per JCPDS no. 86-0550). The XRD pattern of TiO2 sample

Conclusions

Synthesis of nano-sized homogeneous solid solution between Fe2O3 and TiO2 with high photocatalytic activity for oxidative degradation of different dyes was successfully obtained through mechanochemical synthesis. XRD data shows the formation of solid solution having anatase structure with no free Fe2O3 up to 5 mol% of Fe2O3. The chemical and physical natures of the materials remain same irrespective of source of Fe2O3. Fe2O3/TiO2 catalyst have crystallite size about 12–13 nm measured from XRD and

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India. The authors are grateful for its financial support.

References (48)

  • Y. Yang et al.

    J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem.

    (2004)
  • M. Janus et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2007)
  • V. Stengl et al.

    Mater. Chem. Phys.

    (2007)
  • W. Wang et al.

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (2008)
  • Z. Ambrus et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2008)
  • D. Beydoun et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.

    (2002)
  • T.K. Ghorai et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.

    (2007)
  • J-Chuan Xu et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.

    (2004)
  • M.A. Hasnat et al.

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2007)
  • I.K. Konstantinou et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2004)
  • Y. Chen et al.

    J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem.

    (2004)
  • C.H. Kwon et al.

    Mater. Chem. Phys.

    (2004)
  • J.C. Colmenares et al.

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (2006)
  • D. Jing et al.

    Chem. Phys. Lett.

    (2005)
  • G. Colon et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2006)
  • K. Tennakone et al.

    Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells

    (2000)
  • J. Zhu et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.

    (2004)
  • M.I. Litter et al.

    J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem.

    (1996)
  • J. Feng et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2004)
  • Y.R. Do et al.

    J. Solid State Chem.

    (1994)
  • H. Zhang et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. Solids

    (2007)
  • A.A. Ismail

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2005)
  • E. Celik et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng. B

    (2006)
  • M. Kang et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2003)
  • Cited by (99)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text