7
Childbirth and pelvic floor trauma

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2005.08.009Get rights and content

The issue of traumatic damage to the pelvic floor in childbirth is attracting more and more attention amongst obstetric caregivers and laypersons alike. This is partly due to the fact that elective caesarean section as a potentially preventative intervention is increasingly available and perceived as safe. As there is a multitude of emotive issues involved, including health economics and the relative roles of healthcare providers, the discussion surrounding pelvic floor trauma in childbirth has not always been completely rational. However, after 25 years of urogynaecological research in this field it should be possible to determine whether pelvic floor trauma in childbirth is myth or reality, and, if real, whether it matters for the pathogenesis of incontinence and prolapse. On reviewing the available evidence, it appears that there are sufficient grounds to assume that vaginal delivery (or even the attempt at vaginal delivery) can cause damage to the pudendal nerve, the inferior aspects of the levator ani muscle and fascial pelvic organ supports. Risk factors for such damage have been defined and variously include operative vaginal delivery, a long second stage, and macrosomia. It is much less clear, however, whether such trauma is clinically relevant, and how important it is in the aetiology of pelvic floor morbidity later in life.

Section snippets

Adverse effects on nerve structure and function

It has been postulated that labour and vaginal delivery, and in particular the second stage of labour, may have a negative effect on nervous structures supplying pelvic organs and the pelvic floor. While this may also be true for the autonomic innervation of bladder and anorectum, the best-investigated structure in this regard is the pudendal nerve and its branches. Due to its location and ease of access to innervated structures such as the pubococcygeus–puborectalis complex and the anal

Adverse effects on pelvic floor muscle structure and function

What we call the ‘pelvic floor’ is, to a large extent, the pubococcygeus-puborectalis complex. This muscle complex forms a v-shaped sling running from the pelvic sidewall on one side, posteriorly around the anorectal junction, and back towards the contralateral pelvic sidewall. The levator hiatus, i.e. the space between the arms of the V, contains the urethra anteriorly, the vagina centrally and the anorectum posteriorly (see Figure 1 for a comparison of MRI and ultrasound imaging of the

Adverse effects on pelvic organ support

Clinical studies of pelvic organ support were until recently limited by a lack of sufficiently sensitive tools for prolapse assessment. This has changed with the introduction of the POP-Q system for prolapse quantification introduced by the International Continence Society.42 Parity seems to be a risk factor for pelvic organ prolapse as defined by the POP-Q assessment43, but data are scarce due to the fact that even such a simple assessment is invasive and less well tolerated in pregnancy and

Clinical significance: The epidemiological evidence

While there is a growing body of evidence supporting the contention that childbirth often has a deleterious effect on pelvic floor structures, the long latency of symptoms related to pelvic floor morbidity impede studies into the clinical relevance of delivery-related changes. Epidemiological studies are often much more equivocal than the pathophysiological findings described above, as the aetiology of prolapse and urinary and faecal incontinence is clearly multifactorial, and as the importance

Conclusion

There is little doubt that some women suffer significant trauma to pelvic floor structures as a consequence of (successful or unsuccessful) attempts at vaginal childbirth. Trauma may affect the pudendal nerve or its branches, the anal sphincter, the puborectalis–pubococcygeus complex, and/or pelvic fascial structures. The more protracted a delivery is and the longer the duration of second stage, the higher the likelihood of anatomical or functional alteration. Vaginal operative delivery seems

References (55)

  • R.C. Bump et al.

    The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (1996)
  • S.E. Swift

    The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic health care

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (2000)
  • U. Peschers et al.

    Changes in vesical neck mobility following vaginal delivery

    Obstet Gynecol

    (1996)
  • S. Meyer et al.

    The effects of birth on urinary continence mechanisms and other pelvic-floor characteristics

    Obstet Gynecol

    (1998)
  • H.P. Dietz et al.

    The effect of childbirth on pelvic organ mobility

    Obstet Gynecol

    (2003)
  • H.P. Dietz et al.

    Pelvic organ descent in young nulligravid women

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (2004)
  • H.P. Dietz et al.

    Which women are most affected by delivery-related changes in pelvic organ mobility?

    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol

    (2003)
  • E.H.M. Sze et al.

    Pregnancy, labour, delivery and pelvic organ prolapse

    Obstet Gynecol

    (2002)
  • J.L. Ecker

    Once a pregnancy, always a cesarean? Rationale and feasibility of a randomized controlled trial

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (2004)
  • N.M. Fisk

    Caesarean section for all patients?

  • H. Minkoff et al.

    Elective primary cesarean delivery.[comment]

    New Engl J Med

    (2003)
  • A.H. MacLennan et al.

    The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery

    Br J Obstet Gynaecol

    (2000)
  • T.K. Young et al.

    Factors that are associated with cesarean delivery in a large private practice: the importance of prepregnancy body mass index and weight gain

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (2002)
  • P.D. Wilson et al.

    Obstetric practice and urinary incontinence 5–7 years after delivery

    Neurourol Urodyn

    (2002)
  • G. Rortveit et al.

    Urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery or cesarean section.[comment]

    New Engl J Med

    (2003)
  • G.W. Davila

    Informed consent for obstetrics management: a urogynecologic perspective. [Review] [16 refs]

    Int Urogynecol J

    (2001)
  • R.E. Allen et al.

    Pelvic floor damage and childbirth: a neurophysiological study

    Br J Obstet Gynaecol

    (1990)
  • Cited by (71)

    • Description and classification of postpartum chronic pain: A multicentric prospective study

      2020, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction
      Citation Excerpt :

      The classification scheme proposed in this study is easy to use and can decrease medical wandering and a patient’s impression of incurability. Pudendal nerve injury can be caused by childbirth [15,16] and seems to be mostly found after a long second stage of labor, a third degree perineal tear, forceps delivery or a high birth weight [17]. However, pudendal nerve trauma during childbirth is not directly responsible for pain.

    • Pelvic muscles’ mechanical response to strains in the absence and presence of pregnancy-induced adaptations in a rat model

      2018, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
      Citation Excerpt :

      This protective effect, which is greatest at the distention volume corresponding to average fetal size, is diminished at higher strains, indicating a potential tipping point beyond which pregnancy-induced adaptations are no longer sufficient to protect pelvic floor muscles against birth injury. The pathways by which vaginal delivery leads to pelvic floor disorders are believed to be multifactorial, involving damage to nerves,1-3 connective tissue,4-7 and pelvic smooth and striated muscles.8-10 Clinical studies suggest that maternal trauma to the pelvic floor muscles (PFMs) results from mechanical demands imposed on these muscles during parturition that exceed skeletal muscle physiological limits.9

    • The Epidemiology of Pelvic Floor Disorders and Childbirth. An Update.

      2016, Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      One potential mechanism may be damage to the levator ani muscle (LAM). The work of Delancey38–40 and Dietz and colleagues41–43 has done much to draw attention to the role of levator tears in the development of PFDs. The LAM can be injured by stretch (overdistension, or microtrauma) or avulsion (disruption of the muscle, or macrotrauma).44

    • Impact of at-home self-rehabilitation of the perineum on pelvic floor function in patients with stress urinary incontinence: Results from a prospective study using three-dimensional ultrasound

      2016, Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although some studies have reported on the potential use of 3D-US in pelvic floor disorders such as perineal postpartum injuries, pelvic organ prolapse or UI, to date, no study has investigated the effect of a combined rehabilitation (PFMT plus self-rehabilitation at home) by 3D-US. At rest, the levator hiatus has a mean area of 11.4 cm2 (range: 6–36) on nulliparous and 14.6 cm2 on multiparous women [14,15]. The size of the urogenital hiatus has been previously shown to be associated with pelvic floor disorders such as pelvic organ prolapse by several studies [16,17].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text