Elsevier

Atmospheric Environment

Volume 39, Issue 36, November 2005, Pages 6931-6941
Atmospheric Environment

Lack of spatial variation of endotoxin in ambient particulate matter across a German metropolitan area

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.08.022Get rights and content

Abstract

In this study, we describe the spatial variation of endotoxin across an urban setting using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) methods. We also identify potential sources of endotoxin that account for between-site variability and compare endotoxin levels in particulate matter with a 50% aerodynamic cut-off diameter of 2.5 μm (PM2.5) and of 10 μm (PM10). In 1999–2000, we collected PM2.5 and PM10 in Munich urban air and measured soluble endotoxin concentrations in both particle fractions. Using Teflon filters and Harvard impactors, PM2.5 was collected at 40 outdoor monitoring sites across Munich and PM10 at a subset of these sites (n=12). Approximately four samples were collected at each site for a total of 158 PM2.5 samples and 48 PM10 samples. We visited and characterized the surrounding 100 m of each site for potential endotoxin sources. The geometric mean endotoxin concentration for all sites was 1.46 EU mg−1 PM2.5 (95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.21–1.77) and at the subset of the sites was 1.30 EU mg−1 PM2.5 (95% CI: 1.01–1.67 EU mg−1 PM2.5). Endotoxin levels in PM10 were higher, 3.91 EU mg−1 PM10 (95% CI: 3.03–5.03 EU mg−1 PM10), than in PM2.5 and were moderately correlated, r=0.51.

All endotoxin concentrations measured in this study were <5.5 EU m−3 and thus lower than the accepted thresholds for acute adverse health effects for occupational exposures. Sites with more potential sources (n3) had slightly higher mean endotoxin levels (MR: 1.30 for EU mg−1 PM2.5 and 1.13 for EU m−3 PM2.5) than sites with no identified sources. Based on the ranges of endotoxin levels at the different sites, we found very little spatial variation in ambient endotoxin concentrations across the metropolitan area of Munich using inverse distance weighting method (IDW) methods (R2=0.013 for EU mg−1 PM2.5 and R2=0.020 for EU m−3 PM2.5). Potential sources of endotoxin surrounding the sites only partly explained the variation seen.

Introduction

Endotoxins are part of the outer membrane of the cell wall of Gram-negative bacteria. Although the term endotoxin is occasionally used to refer to any cell-associated bacterial toxin, it is properly reserved to refer to the lipopolysaccharide complex associated with the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli, Salmonella and other leading pathogens. Inhalation of bacterial endotoxin or its chemically pure form called lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in doses as low as 4–15 ng m−3 has been associated with acute and chronic airways inflammation and lung function decrements (Douwes and Heederik, 1997; Milton et al., 1996). Given its toxicity and pro-inflammatory effects, endotoxin has been studied in specific occupational settings and in house dust for more than 30 yr (Douwes et al., 2000; Rylander, 2002). Ambient exposure to endotoxin, however, has not well been characterized; at present only three studies have measured systematically endotoxin concentrations in ambient particles (Carty et al., 2003; Heinrich et al., 2003b; Mueller-Anneling et al., 2004). Carty et al. (2003) found that endotoxin levels were significantly related to ambient temperature and relative humidity. Heinrich et al. (2003b) collected fine and coarse fractions of particles in the two small German towns of Hettstedt and Zerbst, which are approximately 100 km apart. The average endotoxin levels were not significantly different between the two towns, but endotoxin content in PM10 was approximately 10-fold higher than the PM2.5 content at both locations. The study of Mueller-Anneling et al. (2004) provides a characterization of endotoxin concentration across a large metropolitan area, but only in relation to PM10. They reported that the desert and mountain communities had the highest endotoxin levels, whereas samples collected in rural areas had mid-range endotoxin levels. The city of Los Angeles itself had the lowest endotoxin results.

Recent studies have focused on the physical properties, e.g. surface size or chemical compostion of ambient particles and bioaersols. However, the exact constituents of air pollution that cause disease and the precise mechanisms involved are complex. Numerous studies have been conducted to determine which components of particulate matter (PM) may contribute to airway inflammation and irritation (Soukup and Becker, 2001). Bacterial endotoxin is one such biologically active constituent of PM that has been shown to trigger a complex inflammatory response in humans. The other justifying point of this investigation is related to the characterization of ambient particle properties, which might be involved in causing the known adverse health effects.

Research on spatial patterns of airborne endotoxin levels may be useful in determining certain outdoor endotoxin sources and might improve assessment of exposure to airborne endotoxin. Several sources of indoor endotoxin in settled house dust have been described (Heinrich et al., 2001; Park et al., 2001b). Park et al. described that it is likely that outdoor endotoxin levels have an influence on indoor levels, e.g. when windows are open (Park et al., 2000). Comparisons of indoor and outdoor endotoxin concentrations in factories (Su et al., 2002), farms (Chang et al., 2001) and in urban homes (Long et al., 2001; Park et al., 2000) have also been described in the literature. In general, levels of endotoxin are higher indoors and inside factories than in the nearby outdoor environments (Long et al., 2001; Park et al., 2000; Su et al., 2002) or in the surrounding areas (includes administrative building, farm perimeters) (Chang et al., 2001). High levels of endotoxin have also been found in agriculture and related industries such as garbage handling and compost facilities (Sigsgaard et al., 1994), cotton mills (Christiani et al., 1993) and in dairy barns (Kullman et al., 1998).

As part of an international collaborative study on the impact of Traffic-Related Air Pollution on Childhood Asthma (TRAPCA), we sampled fine and inhalable PM with a 50% aerodynamic cut-off diameter of 2.5 μm (PM2.5) at 40 monitoring sites and of 10 μm (PM10) at 12 monitoring sites in ambient air across Munich, Germany for 17 months (Gehring et al., 2002; Hoek et al., 2002). In the current study, we used these sampled particles and determined endotoxin concentrations in PM2.5 and PM10.

We report endotoxin levels in PM2.5 and PM10 per milligram and per cubic meter of sampled air and to describe spatial variation of endotoxin across Munich, a German metropolitan area.

The goals of our study were to determine ambient endotoxin levels in PM2.5 and PM10 in the metropolitan area of Munich and describe the spatial varation of endotoxin in PM2.5 across the city. We also describe the correlation of endotoxin in PM2.5 and PM10 measured at the same sites and investigate whether potential sources of endotoxin are useful in predicting endotoxin ambient levels.

Section snippets

Measurement sites

In all, 40 measurement sites were located in Munich, a city of 1.26 million inhabitants located in southern Germany (Landeshauptstadt München, 2001). Munich covers a total area of 310.4 km2 (119.8 square miles) and has an average altitude of 530 m (1744 ft). Monitoring sites were within the city limits and were originally selected as part of the TRAPCA study (Gehring et al., 2002; Hoek et al., 2002). In accordance with the TRAPCA protocol and to better assess the exposures of a related birth

Statistical methods

All 158 endotoxin values, but three were above the LOD. A value of 1/2 of the LOD (0.002 EU ml−1) was used for these three measurements. Since the distribution of measured concentrations was skewed to the right, we used the geometric means (GM) to report mean concentrations for the four samples for each monitoring site. The arithmetic mean was also calculated for comparison with published data. Associations between endotoxin concentration expressed per m3 air volume and per mg of PM2.5 and PM10

Endotoxin levels

The GM endotoxin concentrations for the annual means were 1.460 EU mg−1 PM2.5 (95% CI: 1.207–1.767 EU mg−1 PM2.5) and 0.020 EU m−3 sampled air (95% CI: 0.017–0.024 EU m−3). The calculated GMs for PM2.5 for the 12 measurement sites, where both PM10 and PM2.5 were measured, were 1.300 EU mg−1 PM2.5 (95% CI: 1.011–1.671) and 0.019 EU m−3 of sampled air (95% CI: 0.014–0.024). The values for PM10 (n=12) were much higher: 3.907 EU mg−1 PM10 (95% CI: 3.034–5.033) and 0.081 EU m−3 sampled air (95% CI: 0.062–0.105).

Discussion

Most data on ambient endotoxin concentrations are derived from measurements in occupational settings and live stock buildings (Clark et al., 1983; Crook et al., 1991; Heederik et al., 1991; Seedorf et al., 1998). Several sources of indoor endotoxin have been described in literature (Heinrich et al., 2001; Park et al., 2001a), but sources of endotoxin in ambient air have not been well characterized, especially not in an urban areas. In a longitudinal study (Park et al., 2000) higher airborne

Conclusion

Athough there is little spatial variation in ambient endotoxin concentrations across Munich, there is no difference in geometric mean levels of endotoxin between the city center and the periphery. Possibly due to the low spatial variability in endotoxin or to the site selection, no clear spatial patterns were found. Potential sources of endotoxin surrounding the sites weakly explained the variation seen. The endotoxin levels in PM2.5 and in PM10 were moderately highly correlated. Future studies

Acknowledgment

The authors thank the Munich schools, churches and police stations that granted access to their property for the setup and maintenance of the PM monitors. In addition, the authors thank Andreas Schöpfer and Markus Drees for their help with measurement site selection, Martina Zeiler and Christian Harmath for filter collection, Mike Pitz and Klaus Koschine for weighing the samples, Silke Trautheim and Gabriele Brandt for completing the endotoxin extraction and laboratory analyses, and Dr. Andrea

References (37)

  • D.C. Christiani et al.

    Cotton dust and Gram-negative bacterial endotoxin correlations in two cotton textile mills

    American Journal of Industrial Medicine

    (1993)
  • C. Clark et al.

    Airborne bacteria, endotoxin and fungi in dust in poultry and swine confinement buildings

    American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal

    (1983)
  • B. Crook et al.

    Airborne dust, ammonia, microorganisms, and antigens in pig confinement houses and the respiratory health of exposed farm workers

    American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal

    (1991)
  • J. Cyrys et al.

    Comparison between different traffic-related particle indicators: elemental carbon (EC), PM(2.5) mass, and absorbance

    Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental epidemiology

    (2003)
  • J. Douwes et al.

    Epidemiologic investigations of endotoxins

    International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health Supplement

    (1997)
  • J. Douwes et al.

    (1→3)-beta-d-glucan and endotoxin in house dust and peak flow variability in children

    American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

    (2000)
  • J. Dutkiewicz et al.

    Exposure to airborne microorganisms and endotoxin in herb processing plants

    Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine

    (2001)
  • U. Gehring et al.

    Traffic-related air pollution and respiratory health during the first 2 yr of life

    The European Respiratory Journal

    (2002)
  • Cited by (33)

    • Artemisia pollen is the main vector for airborne endotoxin

      2019, Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The model coincides with other authors who also pointed out rainfall and temperature in the days before prediction10 and in the preceding weeks.35 Spatial modeling of endotoxin showed no correlation with any land use,15,19 but agricultural areas, waste dumps, wastewater management installations, and other anthropic-related surfaces were postulated as the main sources for outdoor endotoxin.15-17,36 We then focused on pollen as a plant growth marker.

    • Spatial and temporal variation in endotoxin and PM10 concentrations in ambient air in a livestock dense area

      2017, Environmental Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Endotoxin-contaminated organic dust is regarded as the most important respiratory hazard within livestock related occupational settings (Basinas et al., 2015). Endotoxins are absorbed onto the surface of particles, predominantly coarse particulate matter (Soukup and Becker, 2001; Schins et al., 2004; Morgenstern et al., 2005; Chen and Hildemann, 2009). Particles with an aerodynamic diameter of 10 µm or less (Particulate Matter 10/PM10) are able to enter the tracheobronchial and alveolar regions of the respiratory tract and are associated with adverse health effects (Lippmann et al., 1980).

    • Endotoxin levels and contribution factors of endotoxins in resident, school, and office environments — A review

      2016, Atmospheric Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, to reduce endotoxin exposure may be important for the control of detrimental effects, and examine the association between indoor characteristics and endotoxin levels is prerequisite in reducing. Although several studies were carried out worldwide to assess indoor exposure to endotoxins mainly through quantification of endotoxin loads in settled dust samples collected by vacuum cleaners (Noss et al., 2008; Samadi et al., 2010; Frankel et al., 2012b), and a few studies were conducted to measure endotoxin levels in ambient air (Park et al., 2000; Heinrich et al., 2003; Morgenstern et al., 2005; Dales et al., 2006; Wheeler et al., 2011), an overall overview of the data about the loads and concentration of endotoxin in different indoor environments is not available. Duquenne et al. (2013) reviewed examples of the airborne inhalable endotoxin concentration levels measured at the workplace but not in other indoor environments, such as residences.

    • Short-term dynamics of indoor and outdoor endotoxin exposure: Case of Santiago, Chile, 2012

      2016, Environment International
      Citation Excerpt :

      A likely explanation for this result is that outdoor endotoxins were measured at a fixed site instead of being measured outside each household. Morgenstern et al. (2005) sampled outdoor endotoxins in PM2.5 at 40 sites in Munich, Germany. They found a substantial spatial variation of endotoxin levels, with geometric means varying as much as one order of magnitude across the city, and by a factor of 4–5 for distances similar to our campaign's separation between outdoor site and households.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text